From: porky_pig_jr on
On Jul 30, 11:20 am, Nmacgre <natemacgre...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> They are working on proving different mathematical formulas. As in
> finishing work started by Riemann of the fact that the number 0 is in
> fact not 0 but -1.
>

I guess that nicely summarizes everything you ever need to know about
Inverse 19.
From: OwlHoot on
On Jul 30, 6:53 pm, "porky_pig...(a)my-deja.com" <porky_pig...(a)my-
deja.com> wrote:
> On Jul 30, 11:20 am, Nmacgre <natemacgre...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > They are working on proving different mathematical formulas. As in
> > finishing work started by Riemann of the fact that the number 0 is in
> > fact not 0 but -1.
>
> I guess that nicely summarizes everything you ever need to know about
> Inverse 19.

Unfortunately it adds to what I already knew, which was a vague
recollection that he exists.

So now that's _two_ of my brain cells wasted. Thanks a lot!


Cheers

John Ramsden


From: porky_pig_jr on
On Jul 31, 9:05 am, OwlHoot <ravensd...(a)googlemail.com> wrote:

> Unfortunately it adds to what I already knew, which was a vague
> recollection that he exists.
>
> So now that's _two_ of my brain cells wasted. Thanks a lot!
>

You're quite welcome. When you feel like wasting whatever left of your
brain cells, beep me.

Yours truly,

PPJ.