From: Mike [MSFT] on 8 Sep 2009 18:11 Looks like the document is incorrect. DNF_ENUMERATED is 0x00000010 and I'm pretty sure it always has been. "yushang" <yusunn(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:7851acc6-e717-4d0b-b989-0f8f0c296383(a)m7g2000prd.googlegroups.com... > On Aug 28, 3:21 am, "Mike [MSFT]" <jlongh...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> Which document and which OS? I see DNF_ENUMERATED as 0x00000010. >> >> -Mike >> >> "yushang" <yus...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:9a7a9ecf-7954-44c5-a034-9b7df3900e61(a)i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com... >> >> > Hi dear all , I find devnode flags showing in kd is different from >> > flags in debugger document . look at this : >> > Flags (0x00002030) DNF_ENUMERATED, DNF_IDS_QUERIED, >> > DNF_HAS_PROBLEM >> > but debugger document , DNF_ENUMERATED is 0x00000008 . > > OS is XP SP3 > Debugger is 6.10.0003.233 x86 > Document is debugger's help doc , DNF_* definition of which is the > same as http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc267821.aspx. It > seems debugger interpret it incorrectly ?
From: yushang on 7 Oct 2009 05:22 On Sep 9, 6:11 am, "Mike [MSFT]" <jlongh...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Looks like the document is incorrect. DNF_ENUMERATED is 0x00000010 and I'm > pretty sure it always has been. > > "yushang" <yus...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:7851acc6-e717-4d0b-b989-0f8f0c296383(a)m7g2000prd.googlegroups.com... > > > On Aug 28, 3:21 am, "Mike [MSFT]" <jlongh...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Which document and which OS? I see DNF_ENUMERATED as 0x00000010. > > >> -Mike > > >> "yushang" <yus...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >>news:9a7a9ecf-7954-44c5-a034-9b7df3900e61(a)i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com... > > >> > Hi dear all , I find devnode flags showing in kd is different from > >> > flags in debugger document . look at this : > >> > Flags (0x00002030) DNF_ENUMERATED, DNF_IDS_QUERIED, > >> > DNF_HAS_PROBLEM > >> > but debugger document , DNF_ENUMERATED is 0x00000008 . > > > OS is XP SP3 > > Debugger is 6.10.0003.233 x86 > > Document is debugger's help doc , DNF_* definition of which is the > > same ashttp://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc267821.aspx. It > > seems debugger interpret it incorrectly ? Thanks . Then where to get the correct doc :)
|
Pages: 1 Prev: WDK 7.0.0 compilation error Next: dsfksvcs.sys missing or corrupt |