From: graham on
Re. the ongoing failure of the windows7 client to authenticate its
machine account, I've upped the log level and added an extra debug
statement to getpwnam_alloc().

There are a couple of discrepancies which I very much hope someone can
explain, or at least point me in the direction of how to resolve!


Comparing the output for a winXP client (successful) and the win7 client
(unsuccessful), it seems that:

1 - the challenge-response mechanism is different for the win7 machine
to that of the winXp machine (and the win7 machine fails this
authentication).

Can anyone enlighten me as to why the different challenge, and why the
client might fail it?

This is the trace for the unsuccessful win7 machine:

[2010/02/05 22:55:10, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:70(creds_init_128)
creds_init_128
[2010/02/05 22:55:10, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:71(creds_init_128)
clnt_chal_in: 444EA615F23340F2
[2010/02/05 22:55:10, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:72(creds_init_128)
srv_chal_in : DE62C1B8DCC1E4AD
[2010/02/05 22:55:10, 5]
libsmb/credentials.c:221(netlogon_creds_server_check)
netlogon_creds_server_check: challenge : 2818DBF48BE4EBC0
[2010/02/05 22:55:10, 5]
libsmb/credentials.c:222(netlogon_creds_server_check)
calculated: EDC837F244BC1EBB
[2010/02/05 22:55:10, 2]
libsmb/credentials.c:223(netlogon_creds_server_check)
netlogon_creds_server_check: credentials check failed.

This is the trace for the successful winXP machine:

[2010/02/05 23:06:44, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:121(creds_init_64)
clnt_chal_in: DF0D76C6D2BF3CDB
[2010/02/05 23:06:44, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:122(creds_init_64)
srv_chal_in : EE4404370EE4219C
[2010/02/05 23:06:44, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:123(creds_init_64)
clnt+srv : CD527AFDE0A35E77
[2010/02/05 23:06:44, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:124(creds_init_64)
sess_key_out : 6D4885F56283E87B





2 - later, (perhaps as some fallback authentication?) the get_pwnam() is
called a number of times for this machine account, initially it succeeds
then in a later call fails NOT because the machine account isn't in
/etc/passwd, but because it is looked up in UPPER case.

Is this a bug?

Here's the trace for the failure:

[2010/02/05 22:55:18, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/02/05 22:55:18, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/02/05 22:55:18, 3] smbd/uid.c:428(push_conn_ctx)
push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/02/05 22:55:18, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/02/05 22:55:18, 5] auth/token_util.c:522(debug_nt_user_token)
NT user token: (NULL)
[2010/02/05 22:55:18, 5] auth/token_util.c:548(debug_unix_user_token)
UNIX token of user 0
Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups
[2010/02/05 22:55:18, 1] lib/util_pw.c:59(getpwnam_alloc)
my extra debug: sys_getpwnam(WIN7HOST$) failed
^ *the name as passed to getpwnam_alloc*
[2010/02/05 22:55:18, 1] auth/auth_util.c:577(make_server_info_sam)
User WIN7HOST$ in passdb, but getpwnam() fails!


rgds,
graham.


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: Greg Dickie on


Hi,

I've just been debugging something related to this. Environment is
samba 3.4.6 with LDAP backend and windows 7 clients. In my case the user
in passdb but getpwnam() fails led me to adjust /etc/ldap.conf so that
machine accounts were also listed as valid users on the system.

I don't really understand why this is required since ldapsam:trusted =
yes in my case and I thought that parameter would bypass the getpwnam()
check.

No idea about the credentials failing, I'm just happy I can give domain
users privilege on the win7 machines ;-)

hope this helps,
Greg


On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 13:58 +0000, graham wrote:
> Re. the ongoing failure of the windows7 client to authenticate its
> machine account, I've upped the log level and added an extra debug
> statement to getpwnam_alloc().
>
> There are a couple of discrepancies which I very much hope someone can
> explain, or at least point me in the direction of how to resolve!
>
>
> Comparing the output for a winXP client (successful) and the win7 client
> (unsuccessful), it seems that:
>
> 1 - the challenge-response mechanism is different for the win7 machine
> to that of the winXp machine (and the win7 machine fails this
> authentication).
>
> Can anyone enlighten me as to why the different challenge, and why the
> client might fail it?
>
> This is the trace for the unsuccessful win7 machine:
>
> [2010/02/05 22:55:10, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:70(creds_init_128)
> creds_init_128
> [2010/02/05 22:55:10, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:71(creds_init_128)
> clnt_chal_in: 444EA615F23340F2
> [2010/02/05 22:55:10, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:72(creds_init_128)
> srv_chal_in : DE62C1B8DCC1E4AD
> [2010/02/05 22:55:10, 5]
> libsmb/credentials.c:221(netlogon_creds_server_check)
> netlogon_creds_server_check: challenge : 2818DBF48BE4EBC0
> [2010/02/05 22:55:10, 5]
> libsmb/credentials.c:222(netlogon_creds_server_check)
> calculated: EDC837F244BC1EBB
> [2010/02/05 22:55:10, 2]
> libsmb/credentials.c:223(netlogon_creds_server_check)
> netlogon_creds_server_check: credentials check failed.
>
> This is the trace for the successful winXP machine:
>
> [2010/02/05 23:06:44, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:121(creds_init_64)
> clnt_chal_in: DF0D76C6D2BF3CDB
> [2010/02/05 23:06:44, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:122(creds_init_64)
> srv_chal_in : EE4404370EE4219C
> [2010/02/05 23:06:44, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:123(creds_init_64)
> clnt+srv : CD527AFDE0A35E77
> [2010/02/05 23:06:44, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:124(creds_init_64)
> sess_key_out : 6D4885F56283E87B
>
>
>
>
>
> 2 - later, (perhaps as some fallback authentication?) the get_pwnam() is
> called a number of times for this machine account, initially it succeeds
> then in a later call fails NOT because the machine account isn't in
> /etc/passwd, but because it is looked up in UPPER case.
>
> Is this a bug?
>
> Here's the trace for the failure:
>
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18, 3] smbd/uid.c:428(push_conn_ctx)
> push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18, 5] auth/token_util.c:522(debug_nt_user_token)
> NT user token: (NULL)
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18, 5] auth/token_util.c:548(debug_unix_user_token)
> UNIX token of user 0
> Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18, 1] lib/util_pw.c:59(getpwnam_alloc)
> my extra debug: sys_getpwnam(WIN7HOST$) failed
> ^ *the name as passed to getpwnam_alloc*
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18, 1] auth/auth_util.c:577(make_server_info_sam)
> User WIN7HOST$ in passdb, but getpwnam() fails!
>
>
> rgds,
> graham.
>
>

--
Greg Dickie
just a guy

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba