wondering why this div is over to the right
in [CSS]
|
Prev: Tabs Using CSS1
Next: IE vs. Screenreader
From: TheBicyclingGuitarist on 6 May 2010 11:47 added: I just found out the problem only shows when my page zoom was at 125%. I don't remember changing the zoom, but when I changed it back to normal view zoom the probem disappeared. It's still a mystery to me why the one row at 125% zoom had white space to the left and the div over to the right instead over to the left... Any ideas on why still welcome.
From: Bill Braun on 6 May 2010 12:11 TheBicyclingGuitarist wrote: > added: I just found out the problem only shows when my page zoom was > at 125%. I don't remember changing the zoom, but when I changed it > back to normal view zoom the probem disappeared. It's still a mystery > to me why the one row at 125% zoom had white space to the left and the > div over to the right instead over to the left... Any ideas on why > still welcome. This might be a reach...the div class for the "Online Glossary for Urban Social Geography, an introduction" is "thumbleft-fudge". All the others are "thumbleft". I have not looked at the CSS; might that be affecting subsequent divs? Bill B
From: williamc on 6 May 2010 12:39 On 5/6/2010 12:11 PM, Bill Braun wrote: > TheBicyclingGuitarist wrote: >> added: I just found out the problem only shows when my page zoom was >> at 125%. I don't remember changing the zoom, but when I changed it >> back to normal view zoom the probem disappeared. It's still a mystery >> to me why the one row at 125% zoom had white space to the left and the >> div over to the right instead over to the left... Any ideas on why >> still welcome. > > This might be a reach...the div class for the "Online Glossary for Urban > Social Geography, an introduction" is "thumbleft-fudge". All the others > are "thumbleft". I have not looked at the CSS; might that be affecting > subsequent divs? > > Bill B Yes. I think it's "catching" on Geography, which has a height. You could add a border and check it. I see this even in FF at certain widths.
From: TheBicyclingGuitarist on 6 May 2010 14:20 On May 6, 9:39 am, williamc <n...(a)nowhere.net> wrote: > On 5/6/2010 12:11 PM, Bill Braun wrote: > > > TheBicyclingGuitarist wrote: > >> added: I just found out the problem only shows when my page zoom was > >> at 125%. I don't remember changing the zoom, but when I changed it > >> back to normal view zoom the probem disappeared. It's still a mystery > >> to me why the one row at 125% zoom had white space to the left and the > >> div over to the right instead over to the left... Any ideas on why > >> still welcome. > > > This might be a reach...the div class for the "Online Glossary for Urban > > Social Geography, an introduction" is "thumbleft-fudge". All the others > > are "thumbleft". I have not looked at the CSS; might that be affecting > > subsequent divs? > > > Bill B > > Yes. I think it's "catching" on Geography, which has a height. You could > add a border and check it. I see this even in FF at certain widths. The dimensions in pixels for thumbleft and thumbleft-fudge are the same, but I added padding to the "fudge" one to adjust for the smaller size of the graphic used....I think maybe I'll redo that into an image with built-in padding to get rid of the need for a "fudge." Thanks folks!
From: Bill Braun on 6 May 2010 14:28
TheBicyclingGuitarist wrote: > On May 6, 9:39 am, williamc <n...(a)nowhere.net> wrote: >> On 5/6/2010 12:11 PM, Bill Braun wrote: >> >>> TheBicyclingGuitarist wrote: >>>> added: I just found out the problem only shows when my page zoom was >>>> at 125%. I don't remember changing the zoom, but when I changed it >>>> back to normal view zoom the probem disappeared. It's still a mystery >>>> to me why the one row at 125% zoom had white space to the left and the >>>> div over to the right instead over to the left... Any ideas on why >>>> still welcome. >>> This might be a reach...the div class for the "Online Glossary for Urban >>> Social Geography, an introduction" is "thumbleft-fudge". All the others >>> are "thumbleft". I have not looked at the CSS; might that be affecting >>> subsequent divs? >>> Bill B >> Yes. I think it's "catching" on Geography, which has a height. You could >> add a border and check it. I see this even in FF at certain widths. > > The dimensions in pixels for thumbleft and thumbleft-fudge are the > same, but I added padding to the "fudge" one to adjust for the smaller > size of the graphic used....I think maybe I'll redo that into an image > with built-in padding to get rid of the need for a "fudge." Thanks > folks! In my small experience I've found that keeping images the same size, especially on a page such as yours, prevents a number of pesky problems. I use IRFANVIEW, which has the ability to fine tune the dimensions of images. Bill B |