From: H. Peter Anvin on 19 May 2010 15:10 On 05/19/2010 09:18 AM, Paul Mundt wrote: > > No, the problem isn't solved, you apparently overlooked the part of > Geert's mail that point out that the test fails to build on architecures > that _do_ have atomic64_t. All of arm/parisc/powerpc/sh select > GENERIC_ATOMIC64, suggesting that the test itself was only ever tested on > x86 and never on the generic implementation. While that may be par for > the course these days, it's still pretty poor form. > I don't see any atomic64_t issues in the ARM, PowerPC or MIPS builds -- which doesn't mean they're not there, but if so they're obscured by other errors. m68k is missing #include <asm-generic/atomic64.h> in <asm/atomic.h>, and SPARC64 and S390 seems to have issues due to missing <linux/kernel.h> in atomic64_test.c; the latter is indeed a bug in the test and yes, should be fixed. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |