x86, cacheinfo: Turn off L3 cache index disable feature in virtualized environments
in [Kernel]
|
Prev: [05/39] dma-mapping: fix dma_sync_single_range_*
Next: [18/39] cifs: guard against hardlinking directories
From: Greg KH on 24 May 2010 19:30 On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 04:13:19PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 05/24/2010 03:59 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > 2.6.34-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Frank Arnold <frank.arnold(a)amd.com> > > > > commit 7f284d3cc96e02468a42e045f77af11e5ff8b095 upstream. > > > > Objection only that this already in 2.6.34. Of course it is, I stupidly said ".34" when this is a ".32" review cycle. Same thing for all of the patches in this series, sorry, my bad. /me goes off to kick his scripts into submission... greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Greg KH on 25 May 2010 13:20 On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 06:50:20PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Greg KH <gregkh(a)suse.de> wrote: > > > > 2.6.33-stable review patch. �If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > > > ------------------ > > From: Frank Arnold <frank.arnold(a)amd.com> > > > > commit 7f284d3cc96e02468a42e045f77af11e5ff8b095 upstream. > > Closer, but aren't all the XX/34s intended for 2.6.32.14, not 2.6.33.5? Yes. This one is a XX/39 and for the .33 tree. > I'm trying to check whether my kernel/profile.c fix (18/34) is in for > both 2.6.32.14 and 2.6.33.5, but getting too confused to tell! Yes, I see it in both trees. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Greg KH on 25 May 2010 17:00
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:41:37PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Greg KH <gregkh(a)suse.de> wrote: > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 06:50:20PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: > >> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Greg KH <gregkh(a)suse.de> wrote: > >> > > >> > 2.6.33-stable review patch. �If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > >> > > >> > ------------------ > >> > From: Frank Arnold <frank.arnold(a)amd.com> > >> > > >> > commit 7f284d3cc96e02468a42e045f77af11e5ff8b095 upstream. > >> > >> Closer, but aren't all the XX/34s intended for 2.6.32.14, not 2.6.33.5? > > > > Yes. �This one is a XX/39 and for the .33 tree. > > Sorry for wasting your time with that noise: you must think I'm mad, > but it appears to be a delightful feature of gmail, combining similar mails: > to me the Subject line says 20/34, but looking at marc I find as you say, > that I have replied to 28/39. > > That's going to be a problem! Sounds like a gmail problem, I would suggest filing a bug for it :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |