x86,perf: P4 PMU -- protect sensible procedures from preemption
in [Kernel]
|
From: Cyrill Gorcunov on 6 May 2010 14:40 On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 02:32:33PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: [...] > > > > Steve, while I'm diving through call graph could you give this > > patch a shot? If preemtion happens -- it'll trigger it fast. > > This one works too. > > Tested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt(a)goodmis.org> > > -- Steve > Thanks a huge, Steven! I'll tinkle a bit more with p4 pmu and will send a series of patches with this one included. -- Cyrill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Cyrill Gorcunov on 8 May 2010 04:20
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 10:06:40AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov(a)openvz.org> wrote: > > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c | 8 +++++--- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Looks good - but it doesnt apply cleanly to tip:master: > > Hunk #3 succeeded at 828 with fuzz 2 (offset 373 lines). > Hunk #4 FAILED at 743. > 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c > > is there some other patch dependency? > > Thanks, > > Ingo > No, no deps, I think it's merging clash. Will update it shortly. -- Cyrill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |