Prev: [PATCH 1/1] perf: add support for arch-dependent symbolic event names to "perf stat"
Next: [RELEASE] Userspace RCU 0.4.2
From: Stefano Stabellini on 4 Mar 2010 14:20 On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > I think you need to expand this comment to explain the consequences of > this change on SMP bringup and timers. I still don't see why there are > (or should be) any differences from PV cpu bringup, aside from the tiny > details of syscall setup (and MTRR I guess, but that's all a noop > anyway, right?). > > Also, I think you can probably do the timer changes in a separate patch, > as even with evtchns, an emulated timer device interrupt will still be > delivered properly via VIRQ_EMUL_PIN_*. > One of the problems is that some VCPU initialization hypercalls at the moment are PV specific and don't work with HVM guests, in particular I find that VCPUOP_initialise doesn't work correctly for me. But the timers shouldn't be an issue because you should be able to receive the VIRQ_TIMER or the emulated timer interrupt anyway. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |