From: Pat Flannery on
Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:
> In other words you've just proven terresterial solar power doesn't work
> either. I'll go tell the folks I know using it that you've proven their
> systems don't work.

Now, this is weird:
http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/03/24/solar-power-without-a-solar-panel/
Then there's the spray-on plastic quantum dots one:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/01/0114_050114_solarplastic.html
If you can get that technologies like that to work then space solar
power only has the advantage of being 24/7...if the power satellites
are up in GEO.

Pat

From: Pat Flannery on
jmfbahciv wrote:
>> Name something that is impossible to make on Earth or would be cheaper
>> to make in space for which there is an actual market.
>
> Vacuum?

Oh, Vacuum...that's nothing. ;-)

Pat
From: Alain Fournier on
jimp(a)specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

> In sci.physics Peter Fairbrother <zenadsl6186(a)zen.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Alain Fournier wrote:
>
>>However there would be other benefits to starting a space-based economy,
>>for instance things can be made in space which are impossible or
>>expensive to make on Earth
>
> Name something that is impossible to make on Earth or would be cheaper
> to make in space for which there is an actual market.

Well there is no market for something that doesn't exist, so there
is currently no market for things that are impossible to make on Earth.
But here are a few things that a space based industry could possibly do.

- Alloys made of metals of very different densities.
- Metal mousse (kind of a metal air alloy, or a metal vacuum alloy(??) ).
- It is suspected that some crystals next to impossible to grow on
Earth could be made in zero g.

But I think that a space based industry would probably not be exporting
hardware to Earth, at least not at first. Exports to Earth would probably
at first be data and/or energy. So a space based industry could build

- SPS
- Giant space telescopes.
- Fuel for interplanetary probes and interplanetary manned missions.
- Interplanetary probes or parts of them.

Would you like more?


Alain Fournier
From: Alain Fournier on
Fred J. McCall wrote:

> jimp(a)specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

> :If the energy density is low enough to be safe, it isn't high enough to
> :be particularly usefull.
> :
>
> Wrong.

Thank you Fred. Such a profound answer really helps.

Jim:

The advantage provided by a SPS over solar energy is not in the
energy density. It is because you get your energy 24 hours a day
and you get it in a much more convenient form. You can convert
the energy you receive from a SPS much more easily because it
is all at the same wave-length. That wave-length is one you
chose for being convenient. The Sun insists on sending us
its energy across a broad range of wave-lengths and only about
half the time every day, not to mention that cloud cover can
cut down on the solar energy you receive.


Alain Fournier
From: Peter Fairbrother on
jmfbahciv wrote:
> jimp(a)specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Peter Fairbrother <zenadsl6186(a)zen.co.uk> wrote:
>>> Alain Fournier wrote:
>>
>>> However there would be other benefits to starting a space-based
>>> economy, for instance things can be made in space which are
>>> impossible or expensive to make on Earth
>>
>>
>> Name something that is impossible to make on Earth or would be cheaper
>> to make in space for which there is an actual market.
>
> Vacuum?
>
>>
>> I hear this arm-waving claim from the space cadet crowd a lot, but no one
>> seems to be able to identify a product.
>>
>>
>
> It sure would be nice to find one.

Foamed metals, some biologicals, and quite a lot of chemistry can be
done better and easier in micro-gee - there are a number of others.

Vacuum is available on Earth at not too high a cost - but micro-gee just
plain isn't.

-- Peter Fairbrother