From: miso on 5 Dec 2008 00:38 On Dec 4, 5:50 am, Dungeon Dave <howl...(a)the.moon> wrote: > > You already have the 12V supply, so I would keep it as part of the > > project. > > okay. It's one less headache, I guess. > > > For one thing, this prevents you from having to deal with the > > mains. There are probably several LEDs in series, plus a resistor. I > > don't think they would use 12V per LED since the drop across the > > resistor would be high. > > Nor me, but the transformer claims it's chucking out that and these are > somewhat superbright LEDs. I'll get a multitester on the DB and measure > the voltage at the parallel end, see if it really is that much. > > > > > What you want to do is pulse width modulate the power to the LED. That > > is, let duty cycle control the brightness. > > > Most cheesy PWM circuits consist of a sawtooth generator which you can > > make out of a 555, and a comparator. > > okay.. I recall some diagram that had a strobe-like effect to simulate > dimness, although it looked more like a square wave (I could probably pop > some caps across the output points to smooth out the wave). > > Ta for the help! > > No, a rectangular pulse is what you want. Your eye will average the intensity. The 200Hz suggested frequency is plenty fast.
From: Preacher Kane on 7 Dec 2008 08:58 > > You already have the 12V supply, so I would keep it as part of the > project. For one thing, this prevents you from having to deal with the > mains. There are probably several LEDs in series, plus a resistor. I > don't think they would use 12V per LED since the drop across the > resistor would be high. > Nope - they're paralleled up.. and just checked the voltage. 13.55V at the supply end!
From: Dungeon Dave on 7 Dec 2008 08:53 From: Rich Grise <rich(a)example.net> > This is my recommendation, but I wouldn't use a 2N3053 and 2N2955 - > I'd use something more like a PN2222 and a TIP32, because they're much > more recent designs, with lots of beta and stuff. okay.. so just replace 3053->2222 and 2955->TIP32? Roger that. > If you want to > switch the low side, lose the 3053 and just drive a TIP31. They're > less than a buck at digi-key. I don't know why, but I'd prefer to have the switch at the high side - something about having floating grounds worry me. > > And yes, 200 Hz is high enough to make the flicker go away. :-) > And yes, my idiotic eyesight never actually READ the site carefully and noticed that! Major DOH! Excuse my noobness/impatience; it's strangely nice to be on the other side of the clueCurtain once in a while! > Have Fun! > Rich Ta!
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: NE612 mixer: input/output impedance in balanced mode? Next: Tektronix MSO2024 |