Prev: Resources for a Career Switcher?
Next: Are natural numbers isomorphic to complex numbers?
From: spudnik on 3 Jun 2010 18:23
"you, people; emergent spacetime blah blah blah!" your polysignosis,
it makes me puke (I mean, Bucky makes me puke, two, but
I'm used to that, and it keeps my guts, clear:
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/figs/plate01.html
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/figs/plate02.html .)

hey, Tim: you could've been a contendah; now,
go do some God-am math, and get back to us, when you have done so!

*mathematica*: four essential subjects, not the God-am trivium (incl.
arithmetic) -- fool.

> Do you people have any notion of furtherance of BF's ideas? Do you
> understand that to develop these new ideas sometimes means making a
> few breaks with the existent language? Do you see your belief system
> as a religious one? Will it ever evolve, or are you : to
> preservation? No matter what variations you make BF's work will always
> be available. Emergent spacetime is only barely around the corner that
> you refuse to budge from. The definition of 3D space from the simplex
> itself directly is completely acceptable. Not only that, but it is a
> generalization of the real number and the complex number. The
> Pythagoreans were wrong, but they still live on as an outstanding
> bunch with some practical results.
>
> Time is now a hot topic in physics, and the one-signed number is an
> accurate portrayal of time. This requires the general dimensional
> reasoning on the simplex to yield this zero dimensional geometry with
> an instantiable algebra.

thusNso:
how can there be "pressure" from a massless wave?... I know,
"photonics" is a huge field, but you don't have to use equations
with momentum to describe lightwaves; the photoelectrical effect
is electronic. how do photons interact with atoms,
excepting electromagnetically via electron orbitals?

thusNso:
current Sci ... no, it's in Nude Scientist, issue-before-last cover-
article, almost like it's New Science, covering the main three
orbital variations of Milankovitch. now, it is just not true that
humans cannot (or aren't) affecting the climate;
the tiny differences of insolation form the orbitals probably
are not "forcing" anything, just tweaking them.

any real theory of glaciation has to account for "glass house gasses"
as the primary forcers, and how the biota & tectonic systems interact
with that.

> There is not a single article anywhere describing what the Earth's
> orbit is doing as it moves along its annual circumference so this is

> http://daphne.palomar.edu/jthorngren/tutorial.ht

> Commentariolis

thusNso:
yes, but special relativity assumes general relativity
in the "twin paradox," because acceleration is required
to get the home-leaving twin, relativistical (I mean, Duh .-)

> Special Relativity considers that relativistic effects such as time
> dilation and length contraction are perspective effects that occur
> when an observer observes an object moving relative to himself.

thusNso:
anyway, Einstien's **** is not really dysprovable, if
it is merely a matter of odd interpretations (viz, *photon*
means "particle" ipso facto "herr Albert thought, So.")

thusNso:
always the "doubling" of CO2 is used as an outcome in the GCMs,
when it is clear that there would be change of the whole phase
of the weather, before that was reached (if you are familiar
with studies of the Quaternary Period, Shackleton et al e.g.).

Dear Editor;
The staff report on plastic bags, given when SM considered a ban,
before, refused to list the actual fraction of a penny, paid for them
by bulk users like grocers & farmers at markets. A rational EIR'd
show that, at a fraction of a gram of "fossilized fuel (TM)" per bag,
a)
they require far less energy & materiel than a paper bag, and b)
that recycling them is impractical & unsanitary,
beyond reusing the clean ones for carrying & garbage. (Alas,
the fundy Greenies say that the bags are not biodegradeable,
but everyday observation shows, they just don't last so long.)

As I stated at that meeting, perhaps coastal communities *should* ban
them -- except at farmers' markets -- because they are such efficient
examples of "tensional integrity," that they can clog stormdrains by
catching all sorts of leaves, twigs & paper. But, a statewide ban is
just too much of an environmental & economic burden.

--Stop BP's and Waxman's capNtrade arbitrageur rip-off!
http://wlym.com
From: spudnik on 3 Jun 2010 18:30
yeah, like in the current Sci.Am.,
teh most sophomoric piece of **** that I've seen ...
since an issue or two, ago. do you get all of your "views"
from that and Nude Scientist?

> > Time is now a hot topic in physics, and the one-signed number is an
From: spudnik on 3 Jun 2010 18:36
were you drooling, when you were typing that?

it certainly ran a little spigot out of *my* mouth.

a lot of us are strictly amateurs in math, but, Tim.
you are what is known as a Pretender (pretentiousness,
is what is printed, below, just like with "your" fromulation
of the angles between coordinates in 4 and n dimensions ...
have a very nice day .-)

> > Time is now a hot topic in physics, and the one-signed number is an
> > accurate portrayal of time. This requires the general dimensional
> > reasoning on the simplex to yield this zero dimensional geometry with
> > an instantiable algebra.

--Stop BP's and Waxman's capNtrade (arbitrageurs') rip-off!
http://wlym.com
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Resources for a Career Switcher?
Next: Are natural numbers isomorphic to complex numbers?