From: BURT on 8 Apr 2010 20:13 On Apr 8, 5:04 pm, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 3, 2:44 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 1, 4:45 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Directions are: > > > > Up down > > > Right left > > > Front back > > > > When we move through space we are moving in a 6 directional space grid > > > in only 3 of these directions. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > For the 4th dimension surface there is two more directions in the > > universe for circling the hypersphere. Hypersphere geometry gives 8 > > directions in its surface. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > So: > > In 1 dimensions there are 2 directions. > In 2 dimensions there are 4 directions. > In 3 dimensions there are 6 directions. > In 4 dimensions there are 8 directions. > > Can you find the amazing pattern here? Can you predict how many > directions there are in 5 dimensions? > > If you do so - you will outdo yourself, disproving the widely held > misconception that people with severe mental handicaps can't think > abstractly.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - The hypersphere geometry of 4th dimension's interior extension has only one outward direction. That is outward with an expanding 4th D radius. The higher dimension radius drives the universe's expansion. Mitch Raemsch
From: Michael Moroney on 9 Apr 2010 16:34 BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes: >On Apr 8, 5:04=A0pm, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." ><ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> So: >> >> In 1 dimensions there are 2 directions. >> In 2 dimensions there are 4 directions. >> In 3 dimensions there are 6 directions. >> In 4 dimensions there are 8 directions. >> >> Can you find the amazing pattern here? Can you predict how many >> directions there are in 5 dimensions? >> >> If you do so - you will outdo yourself, disproving the widely held >> misconception that people with severe mental handicaps can't think >> abstractly. >The hypersphere geometry of 4th dimension's interior extension has >only one outward direction. That is outward with an expanding 4th D >radius. The higher dimension radius drives the universe's expansion. <snicker> Ostap, never overestimate the ability of those with mental handicaps.
From: BURT on 9 Apr 2010 16:41 On Apr 9, 1:34 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >On Apr 8, 5:04=A0pm, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." > ><ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >> So: > > >> In 1 dimensions there are 2 directions. > >> In 2 dimensions there are 4 directions. > >> In 3 dimensions there are 6 directions. > >> In 4 dimensions there are 8 directions. > > >> Can you find the amazing pattern here? Can you predict how many > >> directions there are in 5 dimensions? > > >> If you do so - you will outdo yourself, disproving the widely held > >> misconception that people with severe mental handicaps can't think > >> abstractly. > >The hypersphere geometry of 4th dimension's interior extension has > >only one outward direction. That is outward with an expanding 4th D > >radius. The higher dimension radius drives the universe's expansion. > > <snicker> > > Ostap, never overestimate the ability of those with mental handicaps.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - In the hypersphere surface there are 8 directions all with an aether. Mitch Raemsch
From: Ross A. Finlayson on 9 Apr 2010 21:06 On Apr 1, 4:45 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Directions are: > > Up down > Right left > Front back > > When we move through space we are moving in a 6 directional space grid > in only 3 of these directions. > > Mitch Raemsch I see you've found string theory. Basically parameterize them as infinities then write them to the unitizers in the three. Simple approximation, where there's only one dimension then to store the other two they are out to the left or right, maintaining to each other the circle. Then with the infinities and so on they are similar. Regards Mitch, always you tell the truth, I really appreciate it. Don't get me wrong, I may not have read enough of your posts to approximate your behavior with a truism, still your reasonable logic is superb and excellent. Of course I'd be interested if you had a fundamental disagreement with someone. I believe in the standard model, then for fundamentals the natural atomization because matter is energy. Thanks, Ross Finlayson
From: BURT on 9 Apr 2010 21:19
On Apr 9, 6:06 pm, "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 1, 4:45 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Directions are: > > > Up down > > Right left > > Front back > > > When we move through space we are moving in a 6 directional space grid > > in only 3 of these directions. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > I see you've found string theory. Basically parameterize them as > infinities then write them to the unitizers in the three. Simple > approximation, where there's only one dimension then to store the > other two they are out to the left or right, maintaining to each other > the circle. Then with the infinities and so on they are similar. > > Regards Mitch, always you tell the truth, I really appreciate it. > Don't get me wrong, I may not have read enough of your posts to > approximate your behavior with a truism, still your reasonable logic > is superb and excellent. Of course I'd be interested if you had a > fundamental disagreement with someone. I believe in the standard > model, then for fundamentals the natural atomization because matter is > energy. > > Thanks, > > Ross Finlayson The standard model is how our best theories work together to describe reality as a whole. All theories are as of now incomplete. But when they begin to be completed our standard model will be something of much greater value and of course beauty. Mitch Raemsch |