Prev: disturbance in the electromagnetic field is "the light wave" #561 Correcting Math
Next: 3SAT - CNF to CNF Conversion
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 3 Apr 2010 15:46

It looks to me that only the Luminet team in France is doing the best
experimental
physics work around.
--- quoting from
http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:-dS5qINJtGgJ:arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0509171+luminet+36+twist+weeks+dodecahedral&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

The Poincaré dodecahedral space therefore accounts for the lack of
large-scale fluctuations
in the microwave background and also for the slight positive curvature
of space inferred from
WMAP and other observations. Moreover, given the observed values of
the mass–energy
densities and of the expansion rate of the universe, the size of the
dodecahedral universe can
be calculated. We found that the smallest dimension of the Poincaré
dodecahedron space is 43
billion lightyears, compared with 53 billion light-years for the
“horizon radius” of the
observable universe. Moreover, the volume of this universe is about
20% smaller than the
volume of the observable universe.

--- end quoting from
http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:-dS5qINJtGgJ:arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0509171+luminet+36+twist+weeks+dodecahedral&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us


http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/18368


In that website it mentions that the Universe would thus be about 30
billion light-years
diameter. So that would be what? 3 x 10^10 (10^16 meters) which is
about 3 x 10^26
meters that we have the distance from one end of the entire Universe
to the other end.

So in centimeters that would be a Cosmos of about 10^28 centimeters.

Now in this book I have been using the largest Planck Unit of about
10^500. But here, with distance and time, it looks like I need to
readjust my
thinking.

Perhaps the Universe has a universal space of Planck Units and that
the
largest really is 10^500, when counting say the particles of energy in
the
universe. But when dealing with the parameters of distance, and time,
perhaps
the boundary of Finite is only a mere paltry 10^30 or thereabouts.

So with the logarithmic spiral in seconds and the concentric circles
in centimeters
does the log-spiral measure 10^20 seconds whilst the circle measures
10^30 cm
yielding the speed of light as 10^30 cm / 10^20 sec = 10^10 cm/sec ??

There is another complication in this seeking, in that I have the
concentric circles
in Euclidean whereas the log spiral and circles are probably on the
sphere surface
starting at the North Pole.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: disturbance in the electromagnetic field is "the light wave" #561 Correcting Math
Next: 3SAT - CNF to CNF Conversion