Prev: LSD - why I know what I am talking about
Next: 3x10^10 cm/sec uniquely linked to the end of Finiteness at 10^28?? #564 Correcting Math
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 2 Apr 2010 16:00


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> This whole book is about precision definitions in order to do
> mathematics at all. The
> conjectures in old math which are over 100 years old such as Riemann
> Hypothesis
> or the Perfect Numbers conjecture which is over 2000 years old have
> ill-defined
> concepts, lousy definitions and that is the reason they are unsolved
> and unsolvable.
>
> Fermat's Last Theorem, twin primes, and Goldbach Conjecture have never
> been proven because they never well-defined nor precision defined what
> it means to be a Finite Number.
>
> Now it is my onus or my burden to well define what I mean by disparity
> or skewity
> in the Logarithmic Spiral that represents time in seconds and
> represents Hyperbolic
> geometry versus the Circles that represents distance in centimeters
> and represents
> Elliptic Geometry. I have to well define how I get 3 x 10^10 cm/sec
> (speed of light)
> out of the logarithmic spiral versus circles.
>
> --- looking at this first picture in Wikipedia ---
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithmic_spiral
> --- end looking ---
>
> I am going to use the first five concentric circles and pretend as if
> the fifth circle is
> 10^500. I am calling that fifth circle as having a circumference of
> 10^500 cm.
>
> The disparity or the skew, I am going to define as to this pattern. If
> I cut a rope or string
> that matches the distance of the fifth circle and then make the string
> conform to the path
> of the logarithmic spiral, then it falls short of the fifth circle
> endpoint. This falling short is
> what I define as skew or disparity. It is a small difference.
>
> So that this disparity causes this relationship 10^500 cm / 10^490
> seconds = 10^10 cm/sec
>
> Now I do not know if the log spiral and circles produce 3 x 10^10 cm/
> sec at exactly the number 10^500. I do not know if the skewity or
> disparity to produce 3 x 10^10 exists
> at 10^500 or some other number. I do know it exists somewhere in that
> setup arrangement.
>
> What I know for sure is that the speed of light is the maximum speed
> and there exists no
> superluminal speeds. This means that the speed of light is the
> boundary between Finite
> and infinity. And this further means there is an analog of a large
> number in mathematics
> which is the end of Finiteness. Whether that number is 10^500, as the
> largest Planck Unit,
> remains to be seen. The logarithmic spiral inside concentric circles
> is a good way of
> finding out what the analog of the speed of light is as a pure number.
>

The above disparity or the skew, reminds me alot of the Faraday and
Maxwell
history. Remember when Faraday remarked to an assembled audience of
the
most prominent scientists in Europe with even the attendence of the
British
royality. But it was Faraday who was the most notable person there.

And Faraday made a remark that was historical to physics by saying
that
"light was a disturbance in the electromagnetic field"

By defining the skew or disparity of the logarithmic spiral embedded
in
concentric circles, well, the disparity is the disturbance in the
electromagnetic field.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: LSD - why I know what I am talking about
Next: 3x10^10 cm/sec uniquely linked to the end of Finiteness at 10^28?? #564 Correcting Math