From: markp on

"Joerg" <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:81mnm5FdqpU2(a)mid.individual.net...
> Frank Buss wrote:
>> Joerg wrote:
>>
>>> Frank Buss wrote:
>>>> says there is an implementation which needs a 32 bit microcontroller
>>>> with
>>>> 192 kB ROM and 96 kB RAM. Looks like the IEEE 802.15.4, which is the
>>>> base
>>>> standard for it, is not easy to implement. Same if you would use
>>>> something
>>>> like Bluetooth-Piconet.
>>>>
>>> Yikes. That sounds like Windows or MS-Office where you need at least a
>>> gigabyte of RAM to write "Hello World".
>>
>> No, just 96 kB RAM :-) But you are right, maybe too much for low cost
>> mass
>> production.
>>
>
> This time it doesn't have to be super low cost. But at the same time it
> shouldn't be over-engineered. This easily happens when standards
> committees get together. What's the old saying? Too many cooks spoil the
> broth.
>
>
>>> It's strange, everyone is talking about ambient assisted living but it's
>>> all just PowerPoint jockeying and talk, no real action.
>>
>> LoWPAN doesn't sound bad and maybe is better, if you have multiple
>> devices
>> from different vendors, but unversal multi layer protocols are
>> complicated
>> and devices are more expensive.
>>
>
> Well, if there were off-the-shelf units at reasonable cost I wouldn't care
> whether there is a 32bit ARM in there of some lowly 8051.
>
> --
> Regards, Joerg
>
> http://www.analogconsultants.com/
>
> "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
> Use another domain or send PM.

Note the Jennic modules are 32bit with lots of resources:
http://www.jennic.com/products/modules/

These are very nice modules.Retail for about $16 in volume. Unfortunately
not available for 433MHz only 2.4GHz.

Mark.


From: Joerg on
markp wrote:
> "Joerg" <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> news:81mnm5FdqpU2(a)mid.individual.net...
>> Frank Buss wrote:
>>> Joerg wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank Buss wrote:
>>>>> says there is an implementation which needs a 32 bit microcontroller
>>>>> with
>>>>> 192 kB ROM and 96 kB RAM. Looks like the IEEE 802.15.4, which is the
>>>>> base
>>>>> standard for it, is not easy to implement. Same if you would use
>>>>> something
>>>>> like Bluetooth-Piconet.
>>>>>
>>>> Yikes. That sounds like Windows or MS-Office where you need at least a
>>>> gigabyte of RAM to write "Hello World".
>>> No, just 96 kB RAM :-) But you are right, maybe too much for low cost
>>> mass
>>> production.
>>>
>> This time it doesn't have to be super low cost. But at the same time it
>> shouldn't be over-engineered. This easily happens when standards
>> committees get together. What's the old saying? Too many cooks spoil the
>> broth.
>>
>>
>>>> It's strange, everyone is talking about ambient assisted living but it's
>>>> all just PowerPoint jockeying and talk, no real action.
>>> LoWPAN doesn't sound bad and maybe is better, if you have multiple
>>> devices
>>> from different vendors, but unversal multi layer protocols are
>>> complicated
>>> and devices are more expensive.
>>>
>> Well, if there were off-the-shelf units at reasonable cost I wouldn't care
>> whether there is a 32bit ARM in there of some lowly 8051.
>>
>> --
>> Regards, Joerg
>>
>> http://www.analogconsultants.com/
>>
>> "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
>> Use another domain or send PM.
>
> Note the Jennic modules are 32bit with lots of resources:
> http://www.jennic.com/products/modules/
>
> These are very nice modules.Retail for about $16 in volume. Unfortunately
> not available for 433MHz only 2.4GHz.
>


Yeah, I looked at their site :-(

The other thing that I couldn't find is a LAN link. That's missing in
many systems that are targeted at the home health market. Which I'll
never understand because there are more and more people who don't have a
phone line anymore but they do have broadband Internet access. One of
them in this neighborhood is in her 90's.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
From: Martin Riddle on


"Joerg" <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:81mdtoFha9U2(a)mid.individual.net...
> Martin Riddle wrote:
>> "Joerg" <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:81l2psFdnbU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>>> Is there a cheap (as in mass produced and <$100) pod that plugs into
>>> a LAN port of a regular router and have a, say, 433MHz radio link?
>>> Something that could then connect to several thermometers or weather
>>> stations and ask for their readings.
>>>
>>> It would have to be accessible from the web by a remote server for
>>> polling purposes. Maybe it could just be a mini webserver in itself
>>> that gets polled. 2.45GHz often wouldn't work all that well because
>>> of range.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards, Joerg
>>>
>>> http://www.analogconsultants.com/
>>>
>>> "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
>>> Use another domain or send PM.
>>
>> A weather base station with a serial port and this
>> <http://www.lantronix.com/device-networking/external-device-servers/uds1100.html>
>>
>> Over $100
>>
>
> For just the port? That would be too much, and we'd still need a radio
> module. Ideal would be one that has the radio part in the box.
>
> --
> Regards, Joerg

I know this is what your looking for, but I have no idea about the
price.
<http://www.pointsix.com/cgi-bin/PointSix.cgi?PManager>

Cheers


From: Joerg on
Martin Riddle wrote:
> "Joerg" <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> news:81mdtoFha9U2(a)mid.individual.net...
>> Martin Riddle wrote:
>>> "Joerg" <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:81l2psFdnbU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>>>> Is there a cheap (as in mass produced and <$100) pod that plugs into
>>>> a LAN port of a regular router and have a, say, 433MHz radio link?
>>>> Something that could then connect to several thermometers or weather
>>>> stations and ask for their readings.
>>>>
>>>> It would have to be accessible from the web by a remote server for
>>>> polling purposes. Maybe it could just be a mini webserver in itself
>>>> that gets polled. 2.45GHz often wouldn't work all that well because
>>>> of range.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards, Joerg
>>>>
>>>> http://www.analogconsultants.com/
>>>>
>>>> "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
>>>> Use another domain or send PM.
>>> A weather base station with a serial port and this
>>> <http://www.lantronix.com/device-networking/external-device-servers/uds1100.html>
>>>
>>> Over $100
>>>
>> For just the port? That would be too much, and we'd still need a radio
>> module. Ideal would be one that has the radio part in the box.
>>
>> --
>> Regards, Joerg
>
> I know this is what your looking for, but I have no idea about the
> price.
> <http://www.pointsix.com/cgi-bin/PointSix.cgi?PManager>
>

Aha, thanks! They only offer a transceiver for 900MHz, not 433MHz so
we'll have some problems internationally but it can't hurt to talk to
the guys about it.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
From: markp on

"Joerg" <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:81n9h8Fn2pU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> markp wrote:
>> "Joerg" <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:81mnm5FdqpU2(a)mid.individual.net...
>>> Frank Buss wrote:
>>>> Joerg wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank Buss wrote:
>>>>>> says there is an implementation which needs a 32 bit microcontroller
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> 192 kB ROM and 96 kB RAM. Looks like the IEEE 802.15.4, which is the
>>>>>> base
>>>>>> standard for it, is not easy to implement. Same if you would use
>>>>>> something
>>>>>> like Bluetooth-Piconet.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yikes. That sounds like Windows or MS-Office where you need at least a
>>>>> gigabyte of RAM to write "Hello World".
>>>> No, just 96 kB RAM :-) But you are right, maybe too much for low cost
>>>> mass
>>>> production.
>>>>
>>> This time it doesn't have to be super low cost. But at the same time it
>>> shouldn't be over-engineered. This easily happens when standards
>>> committees get together. What's the old saying? Too many cooks spoil the
>>> broth.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> It's strange, everyone is talking about ambient assisted living but
>>>>> it's all just PowerPoint jockeying and talk, no real action.
>>>> LoWPAN doesn't sound bad and maybe is better, if you have multiple
>>>> devices
>>>> from different vendors, but unversal multi layer protocols are
>>>> complicated
>>>> and devices are more expensive.
>>>>
>>> Well, if there were off-the-shelf units at reasonable cost I wouldn't
>>> care whether there is a 32bit ARM in there of some lowly 8051.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards, Joerg
>>>
>>> http://www.analogconsultants.com/
>>>
>>> "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
>>> Use another domain or send PM.
>>
>> Note the Jennic modules are 32bit with lots of resources:
>> http://www.jennic.com/products/modules/
>>
>> These are very nice modules.Retail for about $16 in volume. Unfortunately
>> not available for 433MHz only 2.4GHz.
>>
>
>
> Yeah, I looked at their site :-(
>
> The other thing that I couldn't find is a LAN link. That's missing in many
> systems that are targeted at the home health market. Which I'll never
> understand because there are more and more people who don't have a phone
> line anymore but they do have broadband Internet access. One of them in
> this neighborhood is in her 90's.
>
> --
> Regards, Joerg

Pity that they don't do 433MHz. The beauty of the Jennic module is that the
32 bit processor has a lot of resources and they provide you with a full IDE
based on CodeBlocks to put your own application in the module itself, in
many cases you don't need anything else. BTW the 6LowPAN dev kit does come
with an LAN board, so the schematics of that are going to be available for
you to embed:
http://www.jennic.com/products/development_kits/jn5139_6lowpan_evaluation_kit

If you could cope with high powered 2.4GHz that might get you the range you
want but might also restrict the markets you could sell in, Jennic also do
high powered versions of those modules.

Mark.