45-degree diagonal cutters?
in [Basics]
|
Prev: vandergraph generator
Next: Learn concept
From: life imitates life on 19 Feb 2010 09:27 On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:48:09 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave(a)davenoise.co.uk> wrote: >BTW, would you like a pic of standard side cutters marked >'for use on piano wire' ? > >Would that make you shut the f**k up? > >-- If they are marked "for use on piano wire", then they are NOT "standard side cutters". The FACT that you have no clue about that basic fact settles the entire argument.
From: Dave Plowman (News) on 19 Feb 2010 12:19 In article <ui7tn5dc11fjtvl46e75letg6jv27iq5hk(a)4ax.com>, life imitates life <pasticcio(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: > I knew about lock wires and the industrial uses for it > back in the late 60s at less then ten years old. That explains things. Your father wired up your nuts with it. -- *Honk if you love peace and quiet* Dave Plowman dave(a)davenoise.co.uk London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound.
From: Dave Plowman (News) on 19 Feb 2010 12:22 In article <6s7tn5po8a6mlpr8rii2k9u664i8padb2s(a)4ax.com>, life imitates life <pasticcio(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:48:09 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)" > <dave(a)davenoise.co.uk> wrote: > >BTW, would you like a pic of standard side cutters marked > >'for use on piano wire' ? > > > >Would that make you shut the f**k up? > > > >-- > If they are marked "for use on piano wire", then they are NOT "standard > side cutters". If it looks like a dusk, quacks like a duck, there's a good chance it is a duck. And they are perfectly standard good quality side cutters. The sort you've obviously never come across in the pound shop. > The FACT that you have no clue about that basic fact settles the entire > argument. Sadly you seem to be unable to convince *anyone* reading here. Wonder what that says? -- *Why do we say something is out of whack? What is a whack? Dave Plowman dave(a)davenoise.co.uk London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound.
From: daestrom on 19 Feb 2010 19:06 life imitates life wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:44:56 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)" > <dave(a)davenoise.co.uk> wrote: > >> In article <qkbln5dscr39tdk0cbnh3v2gpefa48gtdm(a)4ax.com>, >> life imitates life <pasticcio(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >>> I have a pair of twister pliers for lock wire. They are not actually >>> meant to be use to CUT the wire either, even though they have side >>> cutters incorporated into them. Any monkey knows how to flex fracture >>> wire that uses a medium that work hardens. That is the right way to >>> "cut" lock wire. In fact, one is supposed to use the side cutter to >>> simply score the wire a bit, and then the number of flexes is reduced to >>> just a few. >> Lock wire is soft steel. If you have pliers not able to cut that, put them >> back in the kid's play box where they came from. > > > Lock wire is NOT "soft steel" you complete and utter retard. It is a > very specialized, high tensile strength wire. Soft steel does not get > made into wire AT ALL. > Here is your statement that 'soft steel does not get made into wire AT ALL'. Yet Jason pointed out that 'tie wire' used in concrete rebar assembly is at least one instance of 'soft steel' being made into wire. It may not be 'lock wire', but it is 'wire'. Now go on and rant for a while, we're done dimbulb. daestrom
From: life imitates life on 19 Feb 2010 22:14
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:17:32 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > > Un-American? Post your DD-214 to show your honorable discharge, >loser. > > I work for a mil contractor in a secret lab. Case closed. You lose. |