50 cores
in [Design]
|
From: John Larkin on 31 May 2010 23:07 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703406604575278671661900004.html John
From: Muzaffer Kal on 31 May 2010 23:54 On Mon, 31 May 2010 20:07:31 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703406604575278671661900004.html > > >John So they finally figured out what to do with Larrabee. -- Muzaffer Kal DSPIA INC. ASIC/FPGA Design Services http://www.dspia.com
From: Robert Baer on 1 Jun 2010 00:41 John Larkin wrote: > http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703406604575278671661900004.html > > > John > Eh? A little blather concerning "a new class of chips" and a hint might not be related to X86 technology..where does the 50 cores come in? And what is this "new" technology? Programmed in pure Mandarin?
From: John Larkin on 1 Jun 2010 00:55 On Mon, 31 May 2010 21:41:51 -0700, Robert Baer <robertbaer(a)localnet.com> wrote: >John Larkin wrote: >> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703406604575278671661900004.html >> >> >> John >> > Eh? A little blather concerning "a new class of chips" and a hint >might not be related to X86 technology..where does the 50 cores come in? > And what is this "new" technology? > Programmed in pure Mandarin? Two gigabuck-level Intel mistakes: Launching the Itanic and dumping ARM. John
From: Martin Brown on 1 Jun 2010 04:29
On 01/06/2010 04:07, John Larkin wrote: > > http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703406604575278671661900004.html A version of it that doesn't require accepting spam from WSJ <http://www.macworld.co.uk/digitallifestyle/news/index.cfm?newsid=3225208&pagtype=allchandate> Strangely there is nothing about the 32 multicore chip on Intels own website that I can see. It looks like a no news press release that has been widely reported but is mostly fluff with no substance. Odd that since the chips contain 32 core it is a dimer with only 50 cores used. Regards, Martin Brown |