Prev: Mouse and paste across computers
Next: PCI-E 2.0
From: Ben Myers on 26 Mar 2010 00:39 On 3/25/2010 12:19 PM, Justin Credible wrote: > > "Geoff" <nospam(a)nospamformeplease.invalid> wrote in message > news:hofalq$u0h$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... >> http://www.browserchoice.eu/ >> >> the other replys answer your question >> >> i suggest you use something else to view your webpages on though... > > Yeah, I'm getting rather tired with the "this page has been displayed in > compatibility mode, a problem with this webpage........." > > Nothing to do with a buggy browser then? IE 8 is known to have problems displaying pages which were perfect with earlier versions of IE. Leave it to Microsoft! Then they wonder why vast hordes have not run out to buy a Windows 7 upgrade which forces you to use IE 8. (Actually, you can also use Firefox, Safari, Opera, or Chrome.) And corporate/govt America is moving slowly toward Win 7 for the self-same reason. The hillsides are dotted with home-grown internal web applications which happen to be mission-critical to the operation. I'm sure this is true in other countries as well... Ben Myers
From: Daddy on 26 Mar 2010 01:25 Ben Myers wrote: > On 3/25/2010 12:19 PM, Justin Credible wrote: >> >> "Geoff" <nospam(a)nospamformeplease.invalid> wrote in message >> news:hofalq$u0h$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... >>> http://www.browserchoice.eu/ >>> >>> the other replys answer your question >>> >>> i suggest you use something else to view your webpages on though... >> >> Yeah, I'm getting rather tired with the "this page has been displayed in >> compatibility mode, a problem with this webpage........." >> >> Nothing to do with a buggy browser then? > > IE 8 is known to have problems displaying pages which were perfect with > earlier versions of IE. Leave it to Microsoft! Then they wonder why > vast hordes have not run out to buy a Windows 7 upgrade which forces you > to use IE 8. (Actually, you can also use Firefox, Safari, Opera, or > Chrome.) And corporate/govt America is moving slowly toward Win 7 for > the self-same reason. The hillsides are dotted with home-grown internal > web applications which happen to be mission-critical to the operation. > I'm sure this is true in other countries as well... Ben Myers So...if they try to become more standards-compliant, they get righteous indignation from people whose web applications aren't standards-compliant. And if they retain backwards compatibility, they get righteous indignation from people who complain that they're not more standards compliant. For people who enjoy raging against the machine, this is a win-win. Daddy
From: Tony Harding on 27 Mar 2010 07:14
On 03/26/10 11:29, WaIIy wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:25:55 -0400, Daddy<daddy(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> So...if they try to become more standards-compliant, they get righteous >> indignation from people whose web applications aren't >> standards-compliant. And if they retain backwards compatibility, they >> get righteous indignation from people who complain that they're not more >> standards compliant. For people who enjoy raging against the machine, >> this is a win-win. >> >> Daddy > > > Did you take the Microsoft logic course ? Yup, failed it, too <beaming>! :) |