From: David J Taylor on 7 Nov 2009 15:34 "Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message news:4af5bbf2$0$1628$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net... > David J Taylor > <david-taylor(a)blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this.co.uk.invalid> wrote: >>"Charles" <charlesschuler(a)comcast.net> wrote in message >>news:hd25no$ft2$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> Very positive! >> >>Live View and no swivel finder - what an omission considering the price. > > Your pet feature isn't considered useful by a lot of people. > > -- > Ray Fischer Not a feature I use often, but one which adds considerably to the value of Live View. A disappointing omission, IMHO. David
From: Ray Fischer on 7 Nov 2009 16:09 Trolls Is An Endless Task <etiaet(a)somewhere.net> wrote: >On 07 Nov 2009 18:26:58 GMT, rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > >>David J Taylor <david-taylor(a)blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this.co.uk.invalid> wrote: >>>"Charles" <charlesschuler(a)comcast.net> wrote in message >>>news:hd25no$ft2$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>> Very positive! >>> >>>Live View and no swivel finder - what an omission considering the price. >> >>Your pet feature isn't considered useful by a lot of people. > >It's only considered not useful by pretend-photographer trolls People like you. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Ray Fischer on 7 Nov 2009 16:10 David J Taylor <david-taylor(a)blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this.co.uk.invalid> wrote: >"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message >> David J Taylor >>>"Charles" <charlesschuler(a)comcast.net> wrote in message >>>> Very positive! >>> >>>Live View and no swivel finder - what an omission considering the price. >> >> Your pet feature isn't considered useful by a lot of people. > >Not a feature I use often, but one which adds considerably to the value of >Live View. A disappointing omission, IMHO. Other people consider durability to be more important. A swivel finder is a signifant weak point in any camera. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: David J Taylor on 7 Nov 2009 16:13 "Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message news:4af5e263$0$1668$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net... [] > Other people consider durability to be more important. A swivel > finder is a signifant weak point in any camera. > > -- > Ray Fischer Agreed - it's a trade-off, although as you can park the swivel finder with its screen against the camera body rather than being exposed, that's a point in the swivel's favour. Cheers, David
From: Ray Fischer on 7 Nov 2009 16:24
David J Taylor <david-taylor(a)blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this.co.uk.invalid> wrote: >"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message >> Other people consider durability to be more important. A swivel >> finder is a signifant weak point in any camera. > >Agreed - it's a trade-off, And since the camera is intended for people who make heavy use of a camera it would be considered by most to be a significant liability to have such a weak point. > although as you can park the swivel finder with >its screen against the camera body rather than being exposed, Then it becomes just what Canon is selling except that it would cost a lot more and make the camera much bigger and less durable. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net |