Prev: Are space and time separate issues that can be treated in a parallel way.
Next: 9-11 was an inside job.
From: spudnik on 12 Jul 2010 16:01 _61_ _view profile_ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. dood, ever heard of the 5th Amendment?... and I'm out o'here! > http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp?article=essayaninterestingday thus&so: like, I don't have cybergiant datagloves to go through your ****; brevity is the sole of it, dood, and I do have two datapens! > read more »- Hide quoted text - thus&so: so, you've never proven a theorem in geometry?... OK, let me mark that down in my notebook: subject displays periods of typing in Wordperfect (TM). <htmLdot.dotslash EOFile> thank *you*. see, that's what is known as "research;" dyscuss that, and also "'c' isn't the maximum velocity of rocks o'light, even if it is for waves of it; so, there." > limit yourself to two paragraphs? I've redefined the mechanisms thus&so: 'c' isn't the maximum velocity! > why is that so hard to see? thus&so: hey, I lost track of the 3ad, wherein you were said -- in the second person -- to have refuted Galilean relativity; so, what did you really do to it -- how about those 3d glasses? [-- If you just took them off, leave them off for n seconds; if you just put them back on, leave them on for n hours. thank *you*, and n=n, quads erat demonstrandae .--] > Your Einstein biased status quo "spin" form the Department > of Einsteinmania, The Musical Dept {the first album}. thus&so: I *did* focus upon WTC7, but does the numbering infer that it was the seventh bild. to be built?... I think, not. > Focus on WTC7. It accelerated at free fall with near perfect symmetry. > ... "the height of ignorance." --Albert Einstein. thus&so: if it's any consolation, I get the next-to-last word on it; I'd rather wear a pseudorandom pair of Imelda Marcos's shoes, then try to debate in the context of your New sciencE -- just think of all of the permutations, dood. thus&so: that is sufficiently all, to be said on Benford's God-am law; can we not necessarily use e? (not "sumorial, although I know that there is a 'real' analog of the factorial, dood?") > >> "Generalization to digits beyond the first". > For base-b, the probability of d being the n-th digit > (n > 1) is: > b^{n-1}-1 > --- 1 > > log ( 1 + ------ ) > --- b bk + d > k=b^{n-2} > > that the probability of the first > digit being d is: > 1 > log ( 1 + - ) > b d thus&so: sorry; I'm going to stop saying, thence he died, and abuzing my time with this monolog. thanks for all fish! I'm just saying, go jumpt into a pool of spacetime, or timespace, as long as it's deep! > read more »... thus&so: yeah, but are the glasses, 3d, or the clocks -- or neither or both? > ... so, I said, "Hey, Einstein, space and time are made of rubber! > "Just kidding, dood." > I am, however, not implying that he was a surfer, but > he did know the canonical surfer's value ... of pi. thus&so: it's just his bot, as far as I can tell, without researching it ... googoling would be way too much positive feedback, and that's unpositively moderate anyway, what difference between lightwaves and rocks o'light, vis-a-vu the curvature of space (as was uncovered by You now who & you know whO-oo, in the 18th and BCE centuries (or 2nd and Minus Oneth millenia ?-) also, don't forget the ... well, their are a few of them! > If colleagues know, what good? thus&so: .... time, considered to be perpendicular to all of the three spatial directions; at least, in some abstract sense. anyway, I invented the terminology; so ,there.... um, perpendicular Universes: --BP's cap™ call of brokers the group! association http://tarpley.net |