From: spudnik on
on the wayside, your fruitless ridicule is going away
from my lightening fast fingers, because you box the included
newsgroups
with hate-spewtum.

this is more than enough of a time-waster, as it is, thank *you*.

> Your masters are counting on you that way.

thus&so:
_61_ _view profile_
-- and I'm out o'here!
> http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp?article=essayaninterestingday

thus&so: like, Bro or Sis;
I don't have Cybergiant datagloveS with a #200 mesh for your ***P;
brevity is the sole of it, dood, but I do have two datapens!
> read more »- Hide quoted text -

thus&so:
so, you've never proven a theorem in geometry?...
OK, let me mark that down in my notebook:
subject displays periods of typing in Wordperfect (TM).
<htmLdot.dotslash EOFile> thank *you*.
see, that's what is known as "research;"
dyscuss that, and also "'c' isn't the maximum velocity
of rocks o'light, even if it is for waves of it; so, there."
> limit yourself to two paragraphs? I've redefined the mechanisms

thus&so:
'c' isn't the maximum velocity! >>>>>>>>> why is that so hard to see?

thus&so: I lost track of the 3ad, wherein you were said
to have refuted Galilean relativity; so,
what did you really do to it -- how about those 3d glasses?
[-- If you just took them off, leave them off for n seconds;
if you just put them back on, leave them on for n hours.
thank *you*, and n=n, quads erat demonstrandae .--]
> Your Einstein biased status quo "spin" form the Department
> of Einsteinmania, The Musical Dept {The next albuM}.

thus&so:
I *did* focus upon WTC7, but does the numbering infer that
it was the seventh bldb. to be built?... Maybe, not.
> Focus on WTC7. It accelerated at free fall with near perfect symmetry.
> ... "the height of ignorance." --Albert Einstein.

thus&so:
if it's any consolation, I get the next-to-last word on it;
I'd rather wear a pseudorandom pair of Imelda Marcos's shoes,
then try to debate in the context of your New sciencE --
just think of all of the permutations, dood.

thus&so:
that is sufficiently all, to be said on Benford's God-am law;
can we not necessarily use e? (not "sumorial, although I know that
there is a 'real' analog of the factorial, dood?")
> >> "Generalization to digits beyond the first".
> For base-b, the probability of d being the n-th digit
> (n > 1) is:
> b^{n-1}-1
> --- 1
> > log ( 1 + ------ )
> --- b bk + d
> k=b^{n-2}
>
> that the probability of the first
> digit being d is:
> 1
> log ( 1 + - )
> b d

thus&so:
sorry; I'm going to stop saying, thence he died, and
abuzing my time with this monolog. thanks for all fish!
I'm just saying, go jumpt into a pool of spacetime, or
timespace, as long as it's deep!
> read more »...

thus&so:
yeah, but are the glasses, 3d, or the clocks -- or neither or both?
> ... so, I said, "Hey, Einstein, space and time are made of rubber!
> "Just kidding, dood."
> I am, however, not implying that he was a surfer, but
> he did know the canonical surfer's value ... of pi.

thus&so:
it's just his bot, as far as I can tell,
without researching it ... googoling would be way
too much positive feedback, and that's unpositively moderate
anyway, what difference between lightwaves and rocks
o'light, vis-a-vu the curvature of space (as
was uncovered by You now who & you know whO-oo,
in the 18th and BCE centuries (or 2nd and Minus Oneth millenia ?-)
also, don't forget the ... well, their are a few of them!
> If colleagues know, what good?

thus&so:
.... time, considered to be perpendicular to all
of the three spatial directions; at least, in some abstract sense.
anyway, I invented the terminology; so ,there.... um,
perpendicular Universes:

--BP's cap&trade; call of brokers the group! association
http://tarpley.net
From: * US on
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 12:19:15 -0700 (PDT), "S'mee" <stevenkeith2(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>...Yeah it was
>an inside job...

People are still dying from it, and Bush and Cheney
are still cashing in on it.