9-11 First Responders See Loonylies Loser Tactics
in [Physics]
|
Prev: 9-11 First Responders See Controlled Demolition -- FACT
Next: easy proof for rectangular-wedge tiler Re: the revised Maximum Tiler conjecture in 2D and 3D #522 Correcting Math
From: spudnik on 17 Mar 2010 16:37 Rodriguez's observations are dquite valid, he being an on-duty custodian at one of the towers; however, his interp[retations are open to questioning! > Of course not, Hankie the Self-Admitted Fired Janitor. That's why we thus: I'm an idiot. what's funny is that I attended the Ninth Nonlinear Science Conference at UCLA, where the keynoter told the story of how, Newton stole the inverse second-power law (the algebraization of Kepler's orbital constraints). thus: that is, he corrected an error in the marginal statemnt, thus also ruling-out all powers of two, as exponential (from the lemma that you only need to work the prime powers). > why would Fermat explicitly state n=4, otherwise? > (he did not prove n=3, explicitly.) thus: ha, good question about every God-am frequency (1/period). Burt also had a really good question, about (say) How would Sun emit a photon -- what shape does it go?... he must be using the new "mental operating system!" thus: most of the interpretation of the EPR "paradox" results, a l'Alain Aspect et al, is due to the ideal of a photon, in assinging all of the God-am energy of the wave-front as a "mass" (electron-voltage, say) of a particle, whence the wave-energy was somehow "caught" by the photo- eletrical device. here are two ways to get over this: a) just consider the practice of audio quantization, the phonon; b) show how the photoelectrical device is actually tuned to absorb a particular frequency of light. so, is the "phonon" just one cycle of the period of the sound, and like-wise, is the photon just one cycle of the frequency? --Light: A History! http://wlym.com --Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus! http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/ --Stop Cheeny, Rice, Waxman, Pendergast and ICC's 3rd Brutish invasion of Sudan! http://larouchepub.com
From: Michael Moroney on 18 Mar 2010 11:30 knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com writes: >On Mar 16, 11:51=A0am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: >> >>>>>>> Yet you have not one picture or cite for any "steel high >> >>>>>>> rise" that collapsed from fire. >> >>>>>> Pssst: WINDSOR TOWER, you stupid kookshit. >Then why doesn't the WTC Towers look like the Windsor after it >"collapsed?" Ummm, the WTC towers didn't have a fire-resistant concrete core? >> Well, I know why you snipped the part where he proves that you see a >> picture of concrete, and call it steel. >Most of the steel superstructure and the concrete core of the Windsor >building remains. Yeah, ALL the steel remained in a pile of rubble. NONE of it was left standing. It was an EXCELLENT demonstration of how steel weakens in a huge fire, and concrete holds up better. >A few floors collapsed after 18 hours by peeling off the sides. >Whooppeefuck. HAHAHAH!!!! Stupid kooktard denying reality. ALL of the steel framing collapsed into twisted bent rubble, the concrete core remained standing. Why are you in such Denial? >The core is a HUGE heat sink to the rest of the building. Steel is only a so-so conductor of heat. Ever see a blacksmith at work bending a long steel bar? He'll heat it at the point of bending to yellow-white hot, but the steel further away is only red hot and even further away it doesn't even glow. Even further away he handles it with gloved hands. >All that steel was connected even if I give you 25% columns destroyed >by the jets which is a very high figure, the structure was at least >3.5 times redundant. The columns were loaded to 40-50% of their compression failure pressure _at room temperature_. Knock out several of them and the others get an increased load, but not enough to cause failure (the building remained standing). Then heat those columns in a fire... >There is NO "office and jet fuel fire" that can weaken 75% of the 47 >steel core columns, including the steel perimeter and steel floor >trusses ALL AT ONCE to "initiate global collapse." >Much LESS in 90 minutes. >Get real. >That isn't how fire works. As if you know _anything_ about how fires work. NOT. Why won't you tell us why ALL building codes require steel framing to be fireproofed? (besides, the outer columns, not the core, failed first. The core stood for some seconds)
From: Peter Webb on 19 Mar 2010 02:16 You still haven't told us the TRUTH of what happened on 9/11. Why haven't you? What are you keeping it a secret? You must be a MOSSAD agent.
From: knews4u2chew on 19 Mar 2010 02:32 On Mar 18, 11:16 pm, "Peter Webb" <webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote: > You still haven't told us the TRUTH of what happened on 9/11. > > Why haven't you? > > What are you keeping it a secret? > > You must be a MOSSAD agent. Yes. And I'm telling you it was an inside job. The short version is: Three buildings were illegally demolished by the Bush crime family and it's Neocon cronies world wide to trick the world into letting them get away with wars of aggression. G.H.W.B. has been a close friend of us here at the Mossad for many many years. http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/
From: Peter Webb on 19 Mar 2010 07:51
<knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:acb2c267-cdca-4017-ba19-ccc89517d9d0(a)k4g2000prh.googlegroups.com... On Mar 18, 11:16 pm, "Peter Webb" <webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote: > You still haven't told us the TRUTH of what happened on 9/11. > > Why haven't you? > > What are you keeping it a secret? > > You must be a MOSSAD agent. Yes. And I'm telling you it was an inside job. The short version is: Three buildings were illegally demolished by the Bush crime family and it's Neocon cronies world wide to trick the world into letting them get away with wars of aggression. G.H.W.B. has been a close friend of us here at the Mossad for many many years. http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/ ______________________________________ Tell me the long version. I have heard that the objects that crashed into the WTC, Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania were not the commercial airplanes claimed by the government. Were they? |