9-11 First Responders See Loonylies Loser Tactics
in [Physics]
|
Prev: 9-11 First Responders See Controlled Demolition -- FACT
Next: easy proof for rectangular-wedge tiler Re: the revised Maximum Tiler conjecture in 2D and 3D #522 Correcting Math
From: knews4u2chew on 16 Mar 2010 03:30 And the truth will set you free. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/residues.html http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/kevin_ryan/newstandard.html http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/windsor.html
From: AllYou! on 16 Mar 2010 06:58 In news:01021f2f-35e3-4af3-af68-9ec7453ef2ea(a)a10g2000pri.googlegroups.com, knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> mused: > And the truth will set you free. > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/residues.html > http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/kevin_ryan/newstandard.html > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/windsor.html True http://www.911myths.com/ http://www.debunking911.com/links.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debunking_9/11_Myths http://www.answers.com/topic/debunking-9-11-myths http://www.debunk911myths.org/ http://www.slate.com/id/2088092/ http://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Myths-Conspiracy-Theories/dp/15881... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=fahrenheit-2777 http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2006/04/... http://www.2spare.com/item_43133.aspx http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory
From: Curly Surmudgeon on 17 Mar 2010 01:32 On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:54:47 -0700, "P. Maffia" <pmaffia(a)centurytel.net> wrote: > A few years back knews was chosen Village Idiot of the Year, three years > in a row. He acted as if he believed the title was a complement. > > No further voting has taken place for a couple of years because no one > believed anyone could give Knews a run for the title. > > Here it is only March and knews already has at least one very strong > contender in Hank the unemployed janitor. There are several others. But > so far none of them come even close to these two morons. > > Since it is early in the year, we will just have to see how it goes. But > as of now we have two hot contenders for the title along with a few > hopefuls. It will be interesting to see who wins. Ad homenims rather than dialog get you kill filed. -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Republican Party: Our Bridge to the 11th Century ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Henry on 17 Mar 2010 10:28 Curly Surmudgeon wrote: > On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:54:47 -0700, "P. Maffia" <pmaffia(a)centurytel.net> > wrote: >> A few years back knews was chosen Village Idiot of the Year, three years >> in a row. He acted as if he believed the title was a complement. >> No further voting has taken place for a couple of years because no one >> believed anyone could give Knews a run for the title. >> Here it is only March and knews already has at least one very strong >> contender in Hank the unemployed janitor. There are several others. But >> so far none of them come even close to these two morons. >> Since it is early in the year, we will just have to see how it goes. But >> as of now we have two hot contenders for the title along with a few >> hopefuls. It will be interesting to see who wins. > Ad homenims rather than dialog get you kill filed. You don't expect logic or reason from someone who believes in an impossible fairy tale on blind faith alone, do you? As "P. Maffia" so clearly demonstrates, blatant, childish lies and moronic "insults" are all they have, which is why intelligent, informed people so readily dismiss their silly, fact free kook rants. <g> Now, back to the hard evidence and expert research. This video proves free fall of WTC7. Even NIST was finally forced to admit it. This is shown nine minutes into the video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA Here's the quote that the magic fire conspiracy theorists need to focus on and comprehend: "Anyone knows that a building cannot collapse at the rate of a freely falling object while simultaneously crushing 40,000 tons of structural steel because all of its gravitational potential energy has been converted to motion." http://www.ae911truth.org/info/75 TO: Dr. Shyam Sunder, National Institute of Standards and Technology Dear Dr. Sunder, We have heard you state publicly after the WTC 7 press conference that it "would not be productive" for you to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. This is quite disappointing ? as we now have over 700 architects and engineers at AE911Truth calling for a real investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center high-rises on 9/11. At what point will you take us seriously? Perhaps when our rapidly growing numbers reach 1,000 A/E's? Here are our talking points: 1. The NIST November 2008 Final WTC 7 Investigative Report has many fatal flaws: a. NIST was forced to acknowledge the free-fall collapse of Building 7 for 100 feet of its 6.5 second fall only after being grilled publicly by experts who are petition signers of AE911Truth. Yet you do not acknowledge the obvious implications of such free-fall collapse - that the structure had to have been removed forcibly by explosives. (Anyone knows that a building cannot collapse at the rate of a freely falling object while simultaneously crushing 40,000 tons of structural steel because all of its gravitational potential energy has been converted to motion.) -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Iarnrod on 17 Mar 2010 14:15
On Mar 17, 8:28 am, Hankie the Self-Admitted Fired Janitor <9-11nutjob...(a)morons.org> wrote: > Kurly Kook wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:54:47 -0700, "P. Maffia" <pmaf...(a)centurytel.net> > > wrote: > >> A few years back knews was chosen Village Idiot of the Year, three years > >> in a row. He acted as if he believed the title was a complement. > >> No further voting has taken place for a couple of years because no one > >> believed anyone could give Knews a run for the title. > >> Here it is only March and knews already has at least one very strong > >> contender in Hank the unemployed janitor. There are several others. But > >> so far none of them come even close to these two morons. > >> Since it is early in the year, we will just have to see how it goes. But > >> as of now we have two hot contenders for the title along with a few > >> hopefuls. It will be interesting to see who wins. > > Ad homenims rather than dialog get you kill filed. > > You don't expect logic or reason from someone who > believes in an impossible fairy tale on blind faith > alone, do you? Of course not, Hankie the Self-Admitted Fired Janitor. That's why we are never disappointed when you don't deliver on your claims! At least you realize it! You and Kurly Kook ought to spend more time reading your fairy tales to one another while we your many betters remain here in the sane world. <chuckle> |