Prev: Black Death!
Next: Why GPS Atomic Clocks Run More Slowly Before Launch
From: * US on 6 Jun 2010 18:29
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 14:35:19 -0700 (PDT), "S'mee" <stevenkeith2(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>... the obvious.

Obviously, you can't dispute anything from the link.

There's a lot referenced there, all of it available for perusal.

Here's an example:

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/ChandlerDownwardAccelerationOfWTC1.pdf

On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 07:24:45 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>... word that means nothing...

You don't get the meaning of any of the words.

Three words that mean nothing to the bushkultie,
but plenty to those still free to think clearly:

"full peer review"

http://www.journalof911studies.com/
From: * US on 8 Jun 2010 07:27
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 22:04:42 -0600, "WG" <wgilmour(a)I-zoom.net> wrote:

>How to be a denialist
>
>�1. Allege that there's a conspiracy. Claim that scientific consensus has arisen through collusion rather than the accumulation of evidence.
>�2. Use fake experts to support your story. "Denial always starts with a cadre of pseudo-experts with some credentials that create a facade of credibility," says Seth Kalichman of the University of Connecticut.
>�3. Cherry-pick the evidence: trumpet whatever appears to support your case and ignore or trash the rest. Carry on trotting out supportive evidence even after it has been discredited.
>�4. Create impossible standards for your opponents. Claim that the existing evidence is not good enough and demand more. If your opponent comes up with evidence you have demanded, move the goalposts.
>�5. Use logical fallacies. Hitler opposed smoking, so anti-smoking measures are Nazi. Deliberately misrepresent the scientific consensus and then knock down your straw man.
>�6. Manufacture doubt. Falsely portray scientists as so divided that basing policy on their advice would be premature. Insist "both sides" must be heard and cry censorship when "dissenting" arguments or your psuedo non experts are rejected.
>
>http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627606.100-living-in-denial-why-sensible-people-reject-the-truth.html?full=true

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-403757/Fury-academics-claim-9-11-inside-job.html

From: S'mee on 8 Jun 2010 09:26
On Jun 8, 5:27 am, * UltraStrupidman * wrote:
>

Not my fault you and they are ignorant children.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Black Death!
Next: Why GPS Atomic Clocks Run More Slowly Before Launch