From: Iarnrod on
On May 13, 6:11 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> Iarnrod wrote:
> > On May 12, 6:42 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> >> Bob Myers wrote:
> >>> On 5/11/2010 5:44 AM, Henry wrote:
> >>>>  Funny (yet expected) that you're unable to detail any examples of
> >>>> this alleged incompetence. You can't refute a word of it.
> >>> At this point, I don't have to - it's been WAY more than adequately
> >>> refuted a very large number of times.
> >>   What's even funnier than your inability to address the facts or back
> >> up your claims with any evidence or research, is that you seem to
> >> "think" that spewing moronic lies about what I do for a living, my
> >> deceased mother, and/or hysterically screaming that I'm a Marxist, a
> >> commie, and a janitor somehow constitutes a refutation of the facts,
> >> hard evidence, and expert research.
> > Nonsense, Hankie. Your physically impossible claims are proven wrong
> > on their face.
>
>   People who admit that they "don't even know what WTC-7 is", people
> who hysterically scream and cry that they "think" I'm a janitor,
> a Marxist, and/or a commie, and people who lie about what I do for
> a living (and even lie about my mother) are only proving my point,

Who doesn't know what WTC7 is, other than you, fired janitor, since
you "think" it is a building that collapsed in six seconds when all
the videos show it took well in excess of 16 seconds. <vbg>

Stay away from the toilet cleaning chemicals, nut job.
From: Iarnrod on
On May 13, 7:06 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> Iarnrod wrote:
> > On May 13, 6:11 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> >> People who admit that they "don't even know what WTC-7 is", people
> >> who hysterically scream and cry that they "think" I'm a janitor,
> >> a Marxist, and/or a commie, and people who lie about what I do for
> >> a living (and even lie about my mother) are only proving my point,
> >> which of course, is that they are generally ignorant, helpless,
> >> deluded, mindless, lying, and frightened sheep - and quite likely
> >> mentally ill. Thanks for doing so much to help prove that point,
> >> ironhead. ;-)
> > Who doesn't know what WTC7 is, other than you, fired janitor, since
> > you "think" it is a building that collapsed in six seconds when all
> > the videos show it took well in excess of 16 seconds. <vbg>
> >
> > Stay away from the toilet cleaning chemicals, nut job.
>
>   Thanks *again* for doing so much to help prove my point, ironhead.
> Couldn't have done it much better myself... ;-)

Well, if your point was that as a fired janitor, you are even less
likely to recognize the truth that has been proved to you over and
over that you can't even tell time, then you're welcome, Hankie the
Self-Admitted Fired Janitor.

<vbg>

From: Iarnrod on
On May 20, 9:02 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> Iarnrod wrote:
> > On May 13, 6:11 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> >> People who admit that they "don't even know what WTC-7 is", people
> >> who hysterically scream and cry that they "think" I'm a janitor,
> >> a Marxist, and/or a commie, and people who lie about what I do for
> >> a living (and even lie about my mother) are only proving my point,
> >> which of course, is that they are generally ignorant, helpless,
> >> deluded, mindless, lying, and frightened sheep - and quite likely
> >> mentally ill. Thanks for doing so much to help prove that point,
> >> ironhead. ;-)
> > you, fired janitor
>
> Thanks *again* for doing so much to help ...

.... spread the actual proven truth of 9/11, which is that every single
bit of evidence, physics, videos, witnesses, science, photos, et alia,
fully supports the official findings AND refutes your loony physically
impossible ramblings, which even includes your admitted inability to
count past six seconds.

But what better could be expected from a fired janitor?
From: Iarnrod on
On Jun 1, 7:19 am, * Hates US * wrote:
> http://911blimp.net/prf_FreeFallPhysics.shtml

Disproven kookery. Got anything actually true?

Didn't think so.
From: Iarnrod on
On Jun 2, 6:38 am, * Hates US * wrote:

> Notice how nobody can actually dispute the content.

Actually what we noticed is that the "content" is entirely unsupported
in the first place. No need to "debunk" what you've been unable to
show as even physically possible!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAA!!

You can't even do that much, kook!