From: Iarnrod on
On Apr 21, 9:11 am, * Hates US * wrote:

> Notice that the content of the links stands undisputed.

Notice that the content of the links is silly physically impossible
and disproven kooker klaims that are known to be false.
From: Iarnrod on
On Apr 29, 2:26 pm, "S'mee" <stevenkei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 9:35 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
>
> ROTFLMAO...not my fault you are an ignorant commie and your sources
> while lettered are unintelligent and incapable of coming to the
> correct conclusion.
>
> You damn commie fruitcakes sure are stupid.

"Commie?"

He's an insane twoofer. They tend to be anti-gubmint libertarian Ron
Paul types.
From: Twibil on
On Apr 29, 7:48 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> > You damn commie fruitcakes sure are stupid.
>
> "Commie?"
>
> He's an insane twoofer. They tend to be anti-gubmint libertarian Ron
> Paul types.

Hen3ry is so far to the left that it's sort of difficult to describe
him......but his basic political assumption has been that anytime
anything bad has happened -anywhere in the World- it was automatically
the fault of the United States (and Israel) and was all part of the
huge Zionist conspiracy that controls all of our lives.

Thus he manages to believe that Osama Bin Laden is actually a CIA
operative, that there are no actual Muslim terrorists, that the US
government is run from Jerusalem by the Mossad, that the WTC was
actually blown up (the airplanes that crashed into it had nothing to
do with the buildings collapsing), and that he's sane and everyone
*else* is psychotic.

In short; you got the "insane" part right enough, but before he
completely lost contact with reality he was a run-of-the-mill leftie
wingnut, not a Libertarian.
From: Iarnrod on
On Apr 30, 9:55 am, * Hates US * foamed:
> I am a bushworshipper who is permitted only to deny and lie.
>
> Notice how as a bushworshipper i can't address this, either?

Yes, bushkultie counter-disinfo shill, we have all noticed how "well"
you perform for Bush your master.
From: Iarnrod on
On May 2, 9:40 am, * Hates US * wrote:
> "the large amounts of molten steel found at the site of the
> World Trade Center (WTC) in the days following 9/11"
>
> That's from the same link.

Yes, the same disproven debunked kook link since it is PROVEN FACT
that there was no molten steel. Only you claim there was, and then you
present a cite claiming to prove it could not have happened.... you
are clearly insane and smoking crack, kooker.