9-11 was, of course, an inside job.
in [Physics]
|
Prev: IRREVERSIBILITY OF TIME
Next: COME SEE * HATES US * EPIC FAIL -- "thinks" his cite says PNAC "wanted the attack" when his own cite shows it said NO SUCH THING! Iarnrod WINS again
From: * US on 25 Jun 2010 07:17 On 25 Jun 2010 02:33:59 GMT, rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >...an obvious lie. It was an obvious lie when Bush and Cheney claimed they'd had no warning of an attack, then immediately blamed their scapegoat. >Why should we believe You shouldn't believe. You should consider the facts. Notice that the bushkultie can't point out even one thing this expert has stated that would not be absolutely correct. He would know. His points remain undisputed. "28-Year Career CIA Official Says 9/11 An Inside Job" http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2006/070906insidejob.htm There it is. Undisputed. Based on facts.
From: spudnik on 5 Jul 2010 22:24 yo, #44, I deleted your stuff without reading, because of non-top-posting nettiquette and "read more, please?" so, the wherebouts of Cheeny are of such importance, presumably because he was in charge, with Dubya in a classroom. but, keep in mind, at least two executive orders made the VP a) the head of the NSC, circa Raegan's first months (them, they shot him), and b) the head of the Principals Cmte., circa impeachment, that is to say, the Acting President, when ever the PC was in effect ... which could still be. thus&so: OK, why don't you dyscuss, whether or not cap&trade is a "tax," per the WSUrinal editorials' & teaparty's mere slogan, or just another way for the bears &bulls to make money, whilst the hogs get slaughtered? (that is to say, the Next (or very Last) Bailout of Wall Street etc., including Beyondish Petroleumish, the big operators in the Gulf and Alaska ... and "the nationbuilding of E.Timor?") thus&so: the Kyoto Protocol was stricltly cap&trade, a.k.a. "free trade" of the yore of British imperialism in 1776 (whence Smith's second hoax, _The Wealth of Nations_, was published), as Waxman's wunnerful bill of '91 on NOX and SO2. maybe, it was fortunate, that someone lied to Dubya about Kyoto's true nature, or he'd surely have signed it. so, how about an actual, tiny, accountable carbon tax, instead of the next and/or last bailout of Wall Street and the City (of London, financial district & gated community) ?? the voluntary USA cap&trade, apparently partly started by Sen. Obama via private foundations, is already huge, tens of billions of dollars US per annum since 2003, although much smaller than the EU's mandatory one. > > Kyoto and Cap & Trade. thus&so: ice that is within the arctic circles never gets direct insolation over 47 degrees from horizon (or less than 43 degrees from zenith). I mean, that is not really apparent in GCMers flatscreen HDTVs. > Which sea ice (Arctic summer or Antarctic winter) affects albedo, most? thus&so: all of the Liberal Media, oWned by consWervatives, seems to agree with Emmanuel, that this is the time to install BP's old cap&trade ideals from Kyoto ... actually, first launched in '91 under Waxman and H-Dubya. thus&so: so, acid rain is the germain topic, since it was the First Cap and Trade (Waxman's '91 bill). so, what I haven't seen dyscussed in the WSUrinal e.g., is just how wonderfully this'd worked -- who made the money in the God-am "free market?" [NB, Waxman's cmte. also ran the healthcare bill; is that a conspiracy, or doe he get free drugs?] thus&so: sad to say, I missed the authors of _Doubt Merchants_, when they came to the public library, as folks around here rely on me to be the (usually) lone contrarian in Santa Monica, the capital of Green (with the help of Alcoa's largest-ever bequest to the WAND Corp., when the President was chosen to be Dubya's Treasurer ... when HDPE bags are outlawed, only criminals and baby-smotherers will have HDPE bags -- a-hem.) you bring-up 9/11 and Saddam Hussein. well, 2003 was when a) they cut-off a tenth of our supply to Californicators (with their ban on offshore drilling), and spent a huge amount of oil on the new war ... and that's when the hedgers jacked the price up, kind of a double-whammy after the "electricity crisis" from Texas and Canada. thus&so: such is the nature of an ad hoc interpretation of glaciation, that added snowfall requires a "colder" planet (and that more icebergs calving necessarily implies melting ... not according to the satellite telemetry, circa the day of the panel at UCLA, a few y.a.; citing-out two of the professors, known to me.) > increasing WV content results in stronger cyclonic systems > as much as or more than vertical lapse rate changes. thus quoth: Miskolczi said in <http://www.met.hu/doc/idojaras/vol111001_01.pdf> thus&so: what if the same guy who was the source d'Eaugate for Bernward at the Post [*], was also the Vice President, who purposely set his mattress on fire in the first tower (second was hit by a 757 filled with fuel for most of a transcontinental flight, minus the steering loop); and, so, how many mattresses'd he have'd to set, to make for a controlled demolition? well, some of us believe that he was not just the acting president -- especially since the impeachment of Bill C.. * in the theatrical parlance of editor Bradley or ms. Graham, Woodstein ne'er followed the Pennzoil money to <a-hem>; see http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/ --BP's cap&trade plus free beer/miles on your CO2 creds at ARCO! http://wlym.com
From: spudnik on 12 Jul 2010 15:50 sorry, I don't have datagloves to go through your ****; brevity is the sole of it, dood. > read more »- Hide quoted text - thus&so: so, you've never proven a theorem in geometry?... OK, let me mark that down in my notebook: subject displays periods of typing in Wordperfect (TM). <htmLdot.dotslash EOFile> thank *you*. see, that's what is known as "research;" dyscuss that, and also "'c' isn't the maximum velocity of rocks o'light, even if it is for waves of it; so, there." > limit yourself to two paragraphs? I've redefined the mechanisms thus&so: 'c' isn't the maximum velocity! > why is that so hard to see? thus&so: hey, I lost track of the 3ad, wherein you were said -- in the second person -- to have refuted Galilean relativity; so, what did you really do to it -- how about those 3d glasses? [-- If you just took them off, leave them off for n seconds; if you just put them back on, leave them on for n hours. thank *you*, and n=n, quads erat demonstrandae .--] > Your Einstein biased status quo "spin" form the Department > of Einsteinmania, The Musical Dept {the first album}. thus&so: I *did* focus upon WTC7, but does the numbering infer that it was the seventh bild. to be built?... I think, not. > Focus on WTC7. It accelerated at free fall with near perfect symmetry. > ... "the height of ignorance." --Albert Einstein. thus&so: if it's any consolation, I get the next-to-last word on it; I'd rather wear a pseudorandom pair of Imelda Marcos's shoes, then try to debate in the context of your New sciencE -- just think of all of the permutations, dood. thus&so: that is sufficiently all, to be said on Benford's God-am law; can we not necessarily use e? (not "sumorial, although I know that there is a 'real' analog of the factorial, dood?") > >> "Generalization to digits beyond the first". > For base-b, the probability of d being the n-th digit > (n > 1) is: > b^{n-1}-1 > --- 1 > > log ( 1 + ------ ) > --- b bk + d > k=b^{n-2} > > that the probability of the first > digit being d is: > 1 > log ( 1 + - ) > b d thus&so: sorry; I'm going to stop saying, thence he died, and abuzing my time with this monolog. thanks for all fish! I'm just saying, go jumpt into a pool of spacetime, or timespace, as long as it's deep! > read more »... thus&so: yeah, but are the glasses, 3d, or the clocks -- or neither or both? > ... so, I said, "Hey, Einstein, space and time are made of rubber! > "Just kidding, dood." > I am, however, not implying that he was a surfer, but > he did know the canonical surfer's value ... of pi. thus&so: it's just his bot, as far as I can tell, without researching it ... googoling would be way too much positive feedback, and that's unpositively moderate anyway, what difference between lightwaves and rocks o'light, vis-a-vu the curvature of space (as was uncovered by You now who & you know whO-oo, in the 18th and BCE centuries (or 2nd and Minus Oneth millenia ?-) also, don't forget the ... well, their are a few of them! > If colleagues know, what good? thus&so: .... time, considered to be perpendicular to all of the three spatial directions; at least, in some abstract sense. anyway, I invented the terminology; so ,there.... um, perpendicular Universes: --BP's cap™ call of brokers the group! association http://tarpley.net
From: * US on 12 Jul 2010 21:33 On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:50:12 -0700 (PDT), spudnik <Space998(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >brevity ... OK. Bush and Cheney are still cashing in on 9/11.
From: * US on 13 Jul 2010 21:39
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:33:20 -0700 (PDT), spudnik <Space998(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >...Cheeny... It's "Cheney". On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:50:12 -0700 (PDT), spudnik <Space998(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >brevity ... OK. Bush and Cheney are still cashing in on 9/11. |