9-11 was, of course, not possible to be an inside job' COME SEE KOOKER * HATES US * MAKE A FOOL OF HIMSELF BY IGNORING THE PROVEN FACT THAT INSIDE JOB IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Cackling crones and screeching drones have one thing in common, they gibber einstein's stupid theories in cacophonous unision.
Next: Quantum Gravity in 3 Steps Gets Plainer Simpler
From: Iarnrod on 23 Jun 2010 23:54 On Jun 23, 12:00 pm, * US * wrote: > Notice that the bushkultie can't point out even > one thing this expert has stated that would not > be absolutely correct. Notice that * Hates US * the bushkultie counter-disinfo paid shill cannot even point out one single thing this "expert" says that is true. > He would know. His points remain undisputed. His "points" remain completely unsupported and contradicted by FACTS as I have proven beyond doubt.
From: Iarnrod on 24 Jun 2010 00:03 On Jun 23, 8:08 pm, * Hates US * foamed in impotent kooker rage: > So the Bush crime family had its crooked filthy > tentacles into the security for the WTC, etc. No, fuckwit, it had no such thing of course. > The proof is in the public records, but the bushkultie > doesn't know what "public records" means. You don't, that is correct, you counter-disinfo bushkultie lying for them. The public records clearly show Marvin Bush was not a "principal" in the company, which is to say an officer, but that he merely held a seat on the board of directors, and in fact was off the board well before 2001. The board does not run the company, dearie. It would really help your "argumentation" if you actually knew something. > "George W. Bush's brother was on the board of directors of a company providing electronic > security for the World Trade Center, Dulles International Airport and United Airlines, > according to public records." Public records say no such thing, of course. They say Securacom had a hardware contract that got pulled because ti failed to perform well before 9/11 and another company came in and had to do the work, which had nothing to do with providing security services. You're still batting 0.000, kooker.
From: Iarnrod on 24 Jun 2010 23:46 On Jun 24, 5:37 am, * Hates US * foamed in impotent kooker rage: > So the Bush crime family had its crooked filthy > tentacles into the security for the WTC, etc. No, fuckwit, it had no such thing of course. > The proof is in the public records, but the bushkultie > doesn't know what "public records" means. You don't, that is correct, you counter-disinfo bushkultie lying for them. The public records clearly show Marvin Bush was not a "principal" in the company, which is to say an officer, but that he merely held a seat on the board of directors, and in fact was off the board well before 2001. The board does not run the company, dearie. It would really help your "argumentation" if you actually knew something. > "George W. Bush's brother was on the board of directors of a company providing electronic > security for the World Trade Center, Dulles International Airport and United Airlines, > according to public records." Public records say no such thing, of course. They say Securacom had a hardware contract that got pulled because ti failed to perform well before 9/11 and another company came in and had to do the work, which had nothing to do with providing security services. You're still batting 0.000, kooker.
From: Iarnrod on 25 Jun 2010 08:24 On Jun 25, 1:48 am, Strabo <str...(a)flashlight.net> wrote: > Iarnrod wrote: > > On Jun 24, 5:37 am, * Hates US * foamed in impotent kooker rage: > > >> So the Bush crime family had its crooked filthy > >> tentacles into the security for the WTC, etc. > > > No, fuckwit, it had no such thing of course. > > >> The proof is in the public records, but the bushkultie > >> doesn't know what "public records" means. > > > You don't, that is correct, you counter-disinfo bushkultie lying for > > them. The public records clearly show Marvin Bush was not a > > "principal" in the company, which is to say an officer, but that he > > merely held a seat on the board of directors, and in fact was off the > > board well before 2001. The board does not run the company, dearie. It > > would really help your "argumentation" if you actually knew something. > > >> "George W. Bush's brother was on the board of directors of a company providing electronic > >> security for the World Trade Center, Dulles International Airport and United Airlines, > >> according to public records." > > > Public records say no such thing, of course. They say Securacom had a > > hardware contract that got pulled because ti failed to perform well > > before 9/11 and another company came in and had to do the work, which > > had nothing to do with providing security services. > > Yep. Marvin Bush and his security operation inside the WTC is just one > of hundreds of .... ..... lies, Straitjacket. Hundreds of LIES you kooks make up out of whole cloth becuase actual truth proves you wrong. It is indisputable historic documented FACT that Marvin Bush was not a principal of the company, and that the company had nothing to do with providing security at the WTC. It is historical FACT that Securacom was PULLED OFF its construction work LONG BEFORE 9/11 because it couldn't do the work and that Marvin Bush who was merely a director at one time and had nothign to do with running the company's day to day operations had LEFT the board of directors long before 9/11. You kooks simply cannot get around these PROVEN FACTS.
From: Iarnrod on 25 Jun 2010 08:26
On Jun 25, 5:17 am, * Hates US * lied in impotent kooker rage: > http://www.911hardfacts.com/report_09.htm Another nutbag repeating your lying assertions is not proof, kook. > "up to the day the buildings fell..." Proven false, of course, by historical FACT that it is not true. The company was thrown off the job long before and Marvin Bush, who merely was a member of the board of directors and had nothign to do with running day to day operations of the company, also had left the board long before and had nothing to do with it. You are not very good at this "truth" thingy, nutbag. |