911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: Henry on 23 Oct 2009 10:08 Iarnrod wrote: > On Oct 21, 6:31 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >> Al Dykes wrote: >>> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>> AllYou! wrote: >>>>> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: >>>>>> And of course, no one used the words "molten steel" >>>>>> in the quotes below, right nut job? Thanks for being >>>>>> you (a nut job) makes my day even more fun.... <g> >>>>>> "The structural engineer responsible for the design of the WTC, >>>>>> described fires still burning and molten steel still running 21 >>>>>> days after the attacks." >>>>>> "A witness said ?In the first few weeks, sometimes when a worker >>>>>> would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of the beam >>>>>> would be dripping molten steel". >>>>> That's right >>>> Here's your quote, nut job: >>>> "Actually, all the quotes you've provided so far are that they >>>> called it molten metal. Why would you now lie about that? >>>> Still can't find the words "molten steel" in those quotes, >>>> eh, nut job? Yes, you are quite clearly completely insane. >>>> Thanks for proving my point so convincingly. <vbg> >> Can you find the words "molten steel". > Can you They're in both of the quotes, nut job... <chuckle> "The structural engineer responsible for the design of the WTC, described fires still burning and molten steel still running 21 days after the attacks." "A witness said ?In the first few weeks, sometimes when a worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of the beam would be dripping molten steel". -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Henry on 23 Oct 2009 10:08 Ironhead amused its many betters with: > Henry proved: >> I'm saying that when conspiracy kook nut jobs claim that WTC7 >> suffered severe structural damage, they're revealing more of >> their extreme ignorance, obviously. What part of that do you >> find confusing, nut job? > The part where your delusions convince you that WTC7 was not massively > damaged by tens of thousands of tons of free falling steel girders and > flaming debris from WTC1 <snicker> So, NIST, FEMA, and 9-11 truth experts are all wrong, but some clueless nut job on usenet that calls itself ironhead is right? For a nut job, you at least have the ability to slightly amuse your many better, nut job.. <g> http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/wtc082108.html "Finally, the report notes that "while debris impact from the collapse of WTC 1 initiated fires in WTC 7, the resulting structural damage had little effect in causing the collapse of WTC 7." http://www.911blogger.com/node/17554 -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Henry on 23 Oct 2009 10:09 AllYou! wrote: > In news:hbmuvq$6qv$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >> Can you find the words "molten steel" > You can't Yes I can. Why do you lie and act like you're insane? Here's your quote: "Actually, all the quotes you've provided so far are that they called it molten metal. Why would you now lie about that? "The structural engineer responsible for the design of the WTC, described fires still burning and molten steel still running 21 days after the attacks." "A witness said "In the first few weeks, sometimes when a worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of the beam would be dripping molten steel". Let's simplify this even more for you. What's the second word between the quote below, all nut job? Do you see the word metal, or the word steel? "molten steel". -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Henry on 23 Oct 2009 10:10 AllYou! wrote: > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >> AllYou! wrote: >>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >>>> AllYou! wrote: >>>>> Just like you know that beams weighing thousands of tons each >>>>> landed 600 feet from the WTC? >>>> I never made that claim, nut job. You sure do lie a lot. >>> Sure you did. >> But of course you can't produce the quote or the post where >> I made that claim > sure I can. We're not interested in what you can do in your deluded and insane "mind" nut job. Hard truth is, you can't produce the quote or the post where I made that claim here in reality. Thanks for proving my point, nut job... <chuckle> -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Henry on 23 Oct 2009 10:11
AllYou! wrote: > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >> AllYou! wrote: >>> Actually, all the quotes you've provided so far are that they >>> called it molten metal. Why would you now lie about that? >> You're lying and being very stupid and illiterate again, nut >> job. Here are two of the quotes that you failed to comprehend >> because you're barely literate and you're insane. >> "The structural engineer responsible for the design of the WTC, >> described fires still burning and molten steel still running 21 >> days after the attacks." > He was there? One step at a time for you, nut job. You said that no one I quoted mentioned molten steel, and that by claiming they did, I was lying. Do you now see you were dead wrong again and that you're a lying, insane nut job? >> Can you find the words "molten steel" in that quote, nut job? >> <chuckle> >> "A witness said ?In the first few weeks, sometimes when a worker >> would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of the beam >> would be dripping molten steel". > How does that worker know the difference between molten steel, and > molten metal other than steel? One step at a time for you, nut job. You said that no one quoted mentioned molten steel, and that by claiming they did, I was lying. Do you now see you were dead wrong again and that you're a lying, insane nut job? >> Can you find the words "molten steel" in that quote, nut job? If >> not, is there anyone nearby who is sane and literate that could >> help you find it, nut job? <chuckle> > Still exceeding your own definition of a whacko. Did you find the words "molten steel", ya silly, psychotic, deluded, lying nut job? If not, is there anyone nearby who is sane and literate that could help you find it, nut job? <chuckle> -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org |