911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: AllYou! on 20 Oct 2009 13:57 In news:hbknue$353$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: >> In news:hbi2af$m3b$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, >> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >>> AllYou! wrote: > >>>>>> Lacing every single comment with very many insults and >>>>>> name-calling is a very angry trait, and anger is born of >>>>>> fear. > >>>>> No it isn't, any more than it is when I tell you that >>>>> you're barely literate and extremely simple minded. I'm >>>>> just being honest, nut job. ;-) > >>>> Yes, it is. > >>> And of course, no one used the words "molten steel" >>> in the quotes below, right nut job? Thanks for being >>> you (a nut job) makes my day even more fun.... <g> > >>> "The structural engineer responsible for the design of the WTC, >>> described fires still burning and molten steel still running 21 >>> days after the attacks." > >>> "A witness said ?In the first few weeks, sometimes when a >>> worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of >>> the beam would be dripping molten steel". > >> That's right > > Here's your quote, nut job: > > "Actually, all the quotes you've provided so far are that they > called it molten metal. Why would you now lie about that? And that was true. All the quotes you had provided to that point said "molten metal". The fact that you got it so horribly wrong is not my fault.
From: AllYou! on 20 Oct 2009 13:57 In news:hbko33$3j5$3(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: >> In news:hb9nub$jb$7(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, >> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >>> AllYou! wrote: >>>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >>>>> AllYou! wrote: >>>>>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > >>>>>>> How else do you explain >>>>>>> the molten metal that flowed like lava, > >>>>>> Lead, aluminum, copper, and any other substances that could >>>>>> look 'like' lava as much as metal does. > >>>>> So, you "think" the structural steel in the towers and WTC7 >>>>> was made of lead, aluminum, and copper, eh? Good "thinking", >>>>> nut job... > >>>> You're using your conclusion that the molten metal was steel >>>> in order to prove that the steel was melted. The fact is that >>>> there's no evidence whatsoever that the molten stuff that >>>> someone said that they think they saw was steel at all. > >>> Actually, I'm relying on photo and eyewitness evidence, nut >>> job. > >> How do they know that it was metal at all > > Since it was dripping from super heated brightly glowing steel So if it had been dripping from concrete, would that make it molten concrete?
From: AllYou! on 20 Oct 2009 13:58 In news:hbko3k$3j5$4(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: >> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >>> AllYou! wrote: > >>>> Actually, all the quotes you've provided so far are that they >>>> called it molten metal. Why would you now lie about that? > >>> You're lying and being very stupid and illiterate again, nut >>> job. Here are two of the quotes that you failed to comprehend >>> because you're barely literate and you're insane. > >>> "The structural engineer responsible for the design of the WTC, >>> described fires still burning and molten steel still running 21 >>> days after the attacks." > >> He was there? > > One step Was he there?
From: AllYou! on 20 Oct 2009 13:58 In news:hbko48$3j5$5(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: >> In news:hb7gjv$5m2$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, >> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >>> Iarnrod wrote: >>>> On Oct 15, 9:19 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > >>>>> You're still not making any sense, nut job. > >>>> I know that having been fired from your janitor job > >>> Just like you "know" that two planes hit WTC7, and that >>> a controlled demolition displays none of the >>> characteristics of a controlled demolition. <chuckle> >>> What you "think" you "know" is easily proved to be at >>> odds with reality, nut job... <vbg> > >> Just like you know that beams weighing thousands of tons each >> landed 600 feet from the WTC? > > I never made that claim, nut job. You sure do lie a lot. Sure you did.
From: Iarnrod on 20 Oct 2009 14:10
On Oct 20, 10:19 am, Hankie the Self-Admitted Fired Janitor <9-11liar...(a)chemicalsniffers.org> wrote: > Still can't find the words "molten steel" in those quotes, > eh, nut job? Yes, you are quite clearly completely insane. > Thanks for proving my point so convincingly. <vbg> Still can't find the words "I saw" in those quotes, eh, nut job? Yes, you are quite clearly completely insane. Thanks for proving my point so convincingly. <chuckle> |