911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: AllYou! on 6 Oct 2009 16:32 In news:hag2o7$7k7$2(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > PV wrote: > >> Oh, there's plenty of witnesses that said they hear things that >> SOUNDED like explosions. > > But to a deluded nut job, they're all insane and/or liars, > and only Bush and Cheney told the truth about 9-11. <chuckle> Plenty of people said it sounded like a freight train too. Plenty of people said that it sounded like a tornado. Your own expert said that the dust cloud was just like that expelled by volcanoes. Are you now claiming that special black ops units drove a freight train so fast through the towers that it started a tornado which was so violent that it caused a volcano to erupt at ground zero? I guess that would explain the molten lava at the site, and that it really wasn't molten steel after all.
From: knews4u2chew on 6 Oct 2009 17:20 On Oct 6, 11:03 am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: <Economy snip of Spook's front list> And how many of those guys don't work for or get paid by the government or the 'military, industrial, educational, Masonic, Zionist "complex." They aren't independent. Guys who lose their jobs for speaking up about crimes are independent. > -- > Al Dykes (Spook) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6498070204870579516#
From: AllYou! on 6 Oct 2009 18:01 In news:2675bdb2-54ce-4221-b86d-07affb183703(a)x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com, knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> mused: > On Oct 5, 1:09 pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgSaBT9hNU >>> Prove these guys wrong. >> >> Prove that they are right. > > Mexican stand off. To genuine, sane people, a claim is only valid to the degree it can be supported. Therefore, the burden of support falls to the claimant. To disingenuous people, insane people, any claim can be made, not matter how outlandish, and it falls to others to disprove it. You've implied that the claims made in the video are valid. If so, then it doesn't fall to me, as a sane, genuine person, to invalidate them. Instead, it falls to you, as the person claiming that those clams are valid, to support your claim. > Why don't we just have a new INDEPENDENT investigation to settle > it once and for all? Who pays? > Surely you can't deny that? There is no investigation that could ever be done where there won't be some kook or other that insists that it wasn't influenced by black opps spooks. > You can have the chance to have your side proven once and for > all? Or not. It's already been proven short of claims such as entirely new technologies known only to Jews were used to commit the dastardly deed. > What are you afraid of? Of what are you afraid?
From: AllYou! on 6 Oct 2009 18:02 In news:10969748-a2ff-4d3b-aa65-ce6e4d798ec6(a)h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com, knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> mused: > On Oct 6, 11:03 am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > > <Economy snip of Spook's front list> > And how many of those guys don't work for or get paid by the > government or the 'military, industrial, educational, Masonic, > Zionist "complex." > > They aren't independent. > Guys who lose their jobs for speaking up about crimes are > independent. How do you know that they're not paid by the Jews to appear so kooky so as to discredit any real counter-claims?
From: knews4u2chew on 6 Oct 2009 18:34
On Oct 6, 11:07 am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > In article <91b13ebb-d195-4613-ba0a-835f5a220...(a)z3g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, > > > > <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >On Oct 6, 10:22=A0am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > >> Innews:hafgln$74m$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, > >> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: > > >> > PV wrote: > > >> >> Also, all tornadoes are actually freight trains. > > >> > =A0Of course they are, kooker. And, of course, a 1500 degree > >> > fire can heat steel to well over 2500 degrees, > > >> Again, you seem to enjoy displaying your ignorace. =A0Steel begins to > >> weaken as it is heated. =A0There is no magic temperature below which > >> it is 'strong', and over which is is 'weak'. =A0And it certainly does > >> not have to melt before it fails. > > >> But I noticed that you snipped the quiestion I asked, and so I'll > >> challenge you to answer it. > > >> If, when people say that the noises they heard 'sounded like > >> explosions', it therefore means that there were explosions, then > >> wouldn't it necessarily follow that when people say that controlled > >> demolitions produce clouds of dust like those of volcanoes, that the > >> clouds which were seen at those demolition sites were produced by > >> volcanoes? =A0And so wouldn't that also mean that many of your kooky > >> friends are making the case that the WTC towers were destroyed by > >> volcanoes? > > >You win the Stupid Contest. > >Spook. > >http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html > > "explosion" is just a good word for loud noise. Lots of people heard > loud noises on 9/11. > > No noise heard by only one or a few people is loud enough to be caused > by man-made demolition. > > Man-nade demolition would be heard by a million New Yorkers. > > No such noise was heard. > Pffffft..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn-MCCZ3O1M&feature=PlayList&p=6861B95B0BF9864E&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=2 Don't need "explosions." But there were plenty recorded and the debris field proves explosive lateral force. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6498070204870579516# > -- > Al Dykes > (Spook) |