From: knews4u2chew on
On Oct 6, 10:30 am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
> In article <0e1a15b2-075e-40d7-a505-ff7bc71d3...(a)x6g2000prc.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>  <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Oct 6, 12:11=A0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
> >> In article <d55f6c3a-0a74-4bd5-bb33-c4e66cdc8...(a)u36g2000prn.googlegroups=
> >.com>,
>
> >> =A0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >On Oct 5, 2:33=3DA0pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Oct 5, 12:34=3DA0pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >> >> > On Oct 5, 10:41=3DA0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
>
> >> >> > > In article <a9b2b9b8-2a29-42f5-
>
> >> >> > <snip all your distractions>
>
> >> >> > > BEEP BEEP BEEP =3DA0 k00k makes ad hominem attack instead of addre=
> >ssing=3D
> >> > point =3DA0BEEP BEEP BEEP
> >> >> > > BEEP BEEP BEEP =3DA0 k00k changes topics instead of addressing poi=
> >nt =3D
> >> >=3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 BEEP BEEP BEEP
>
> >> >> > > --
> >> >> > > Al Dykes
> >> >> > > =3DA0News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else =
> >is ad=3D
> >> >vertising.
> >> >> > > =3DA0 =3DA0 - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
>
> >> >> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D3DPWgSaBT9hNU
> >> >> > Prove these guys wrong.
>
> >> >> They've been proven wrong.
>
> >> >Liar.
> >> >Where?
> >> >By whom?
> >> >You?
> >> >With your arm waving?
>
> >> >>Physics. Laws of physics are inviolate.
>
> >> >Yup.
> >> >Those building never could have collapsed that way.
> >> >Physics proves it.
>
> >> >> There is no such thing as cartoon magic cilent and invisible
> >> >> "explosives." Life is not a Wile E Coyote cartoon, dearie.
>
> >> >No one claims "invisible" anything except you.
> >> >There is a thing called a "smoke screen" though.
> >> >The WTC dust clouds are the perfect kind.
>
> >> Hundreds of thousands of people were close enough to hear demolition
> >> explosions. =A0Nobody heard man-made explosives. There are no silent
> >> demolition explosions.
>
> >> --
> >> Al Dykes
> >> =A0News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advert=
> >ising.
> >> =A0 =A0 - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
>
> >Except that you are a liar and many heard and were hit by explosions.
> >http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=3Dexplosions+wtc&search_t....
> >&aq=3Df
> >Many probably couldn't hear much "distinctly" with thousands of people
> >screaming and yelling and sirens going off all around.
> >Perfect cover for "cutting" charges that don't have to be loud.
> >No "explosion" is needed.
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DWn-MCCZ3O1M
> >Then, if you were far enough away across water to carry the sounds,
> >you can hear and record the explosions.
> >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3D6498070204870579516#
>
> Nobody reports hearing explosions that preceded a collapse and are
> loud enough to be consistent with man-made demolition.
>
Liar.
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=wtc+basement+explosions&search_type=&aq=f

> Nobody. You could prove me wring by naming ONE. Just one. Make it your
> best case. Lets see where he was and what he heard.
>
I keep giving you videos of ten people.
Pick one blind man.
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=wtc+explosions&search_type=&aq=f

> The video from across the river has had the audio added. It's fake
> according to the guy that shot it.
>
Liar.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6498070204870579516#

> It explosions were heard by him, a few million New Yorkers would have
> also heard it and it would be recorded on the sound tracks of
> countless video cameras.
>
> No such audio exists.
>
Liar.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6498070204870579516#

And then there is this at WTC 7.
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=WTC7+EXPLOSIONS&emb=0#

> --
> Al Dykes


So just keep lying and denying and I'll keep posting eyewitnesses and
live video that proves you a liar.
From: Al Dykes on
In article <91b13ebb-d195-4613-ba0a-835f5a220e02(a)z3g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
<knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Oct 6, 10:22=A0am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote:
>> Innews:hafgln$74m$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu,
>> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused:
>>
>> > PV wrote:
>>
>> >> Also, all tornadoes are actually freight trains.
>>
>> > =A0Of course they are, kooker. And, of course, a 1500 degree
>> > fire can heat steel to well over 2500 degrees,
>>
>> Again, you seem to enjoy displaying your ignorace. =A0Steel begins to
>> weaken as it is heated. =A0There is no magic temperature below which
>> it is 'strong', and over which is is 'weak'. =A0And it certainly does
>> not have to melt before it fails.
>>
>> But I noticed that you snipped the quiestion I asked, and so I'll
>> challenge you to answer it.
>>
>> If, when people say that the noises they heard 'sounded like
>> explosions', it therefore means that there were explosions, then
>> wouldn't it necessarily follow that when people say that controlled
>> demolitions produce clouds of dust like those of volcanoes, that the
>> clouds which were seen at those demolition sites were produced by
>> volcanoes? =A0And so wouldn't that also mean that many of your kooky
>> friends are making the case that the WTC towers were destroyed by
>> volcanoes?
>
>You win the Stupid Contest.
>Spook.
>http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html



"explosion" is just a good word for loud noise. Lots of people heard
loud noises on 9/11.

No noise heard by only one or a few people is loud enough to be caused
by man-made demolition.

Man-nade demolition would be heard by a million New Yorkers.

No such noise was heard.


--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail

From: Al Dykes on
In article <674d2381-4dff-4ed1-8354-c40692763936(a)u16g2000pru.googlegroups.com>,
<knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Oct 6, 10:30=A0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
>> In article <0e1a15b2-075e-40d7-a505-ff7bc71d3...(a)x6g2000prc.googlegroups.=
>com>,
>>
>>
>>
>> =A0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >On Oct 6, 12:11=3DA0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
>> >> In article <d55f6c3a-0a74-4bd5-bb33-c4e66cdc8...(a)u36g2000prn.googlegro=
>ups=3D
>> >.com>,
>>
>> >> =3DA0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Oct 5, 2:33=3D3DA0pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >> On Oct 5, 12:34=3D3DA0pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > On Oct 5, 10:41=3D3DA0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > > In article <a9b2b9b8-2a29-42f5-
>>
>> >> >> > <snip all your distractions>
>>
>> >> >> > > BEEP BEEP BEEP =3D3DA0 k00k makes ad hominem attack instead of =
>addre=3D
>> >ssing=3D3D
>> >> > point =3D3DA0BEEP BEEP BEEP
>> >> >> > > BEEP BEEP BEEP =3D3DA0 k00k changes topics instead of addressin=
>g poi=3D
>> >nt =3D3D
>> >> >=3D3DA0 =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0 BEEP BEEP BEEP
>>
>> >> >> > > --
>> >> >> > > Al Dykes
>> >> >> > > =3D3DA0News is something someone wants to suppress, everything =
>else =3D
>> >is ad=3D3D
>> >> >vertising.
>> >> >> > > =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0 - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
>>
>> >> >> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D3D3DPWgSaBT9hNU
>> >> >> > Prove these guys wrong.
>>
>> >> >> They've been proven wrong.
>>
>> >> >Liar.
>> >> >Where?
>> >> >By whom?
>> >> >You?
>> >> >With your arm waving?
>>
>> >> >>Physics. Laws of physics are inviolate.
>>
>> >> >Yup.
>> >> >Those building never could have collapsed that way.
>> >> >Physics proves it.
>>
>> >> >> There is no such thing as cartoon magic cilent and invisible
>> >> >> "explosives." Life is not a Wile E Coyote cartoon, dearie.
>>
>> >> >No one claims "invisible" anything except you.
>> >> >There is a thing called a "smoke screen" though.
>> >> >The WTC dust clouds are the perfect kind.
>>
>> >> Hundreds of thousands of people were close enough to hear demolition
>> >> explosions. =3DA0Nobody heard man-made explosives. There are no silent
>> >> demolition explosions.
>>
>> >> --
>> >> Al Dykes
>> >> =3DA0News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is a=
>dvert=3D
>> >ising.
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0 - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
>>
>> >Except that you are a liar and many heard and were hit by explosions.
>> >http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=3D3Dexplosions+wtc&search_t.=
>..
>> >&aq=3D3Df
>> >Many probably couldn't hear much "distinctly" with thousands of people
>> >screaming and yelling and sirens going off all around.
>> >Perfect cover for "cutting" charges that don't have to be loud.
>> >No "explosion" is needed.
>> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D3DWn-MCCZ3O1M
>> >Then, if you were far enough away across water to carry the sounds,
>> >you can hear and record the explosions.
>> >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3D3D6498070204870579516#
>>
>> Nobody reports hearing explosions that preceded a collapse and are
>> loud enough to be consistent with man-made demolition.
>>
>Liar.
>http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=3Dwtc+basement+explosions&searc=
>h_type=3D&aq=3Df
>
>> Nobody. You could prove me wring by naming ONE. Just one. Make it your
>> best case. Lets see where he was and what he heard.
>>
>I keep giving you videos of ten people.
>Pick one blind man.
>http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=3Dwtc+explosions&search_type=3D=
>&aq=3Df
>
>> The video from across the river has had the audio added. It's fake
>> according to the guy that shot it.
>>
>Liar.
>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3D6498070204870579516#
>
>> It explosions were heard by him, a few million New Yorkers would have
>> also heard it and it would be recorded on the sound tracks of
>> countless video cameras.
>>
>> No such audio exists.
>>
>Liar.
>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3D6498070204870579516#


Broken URL.

>
>And then there is this at WTC 7.
>http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=3DWTC7+EXPLOSIONS&emb=3D0#
>

I don't play 21 questions. Give me a name.





--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail

From: knews4u2chew on
On Oct 6, 10:44 am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
> In article <hafvcs$24...(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu>,
>
>
>
> Henry  <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> >AllYou! wrote:
> >> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused:
>
> >>>  Tell us why you "think" your imaginary compressed air remained
> >>> focused like a cannon shot when it entered the vast open office
> >>> spaces.
>
> >> It didn't have to do that
>
> >  Compressed air can't do that if it enters a huge open area of
> >uncompressed air, but according to you, it did. That's why we
> >know you're nuts.
>
> >> It doesn't need to be tightly focused.
>
> Nobody saw or heard anything consistent with man-made demolition at
> WTC.
> --
> Al Dykes

"Nobody?"
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6498070204870579516#

You can lie and deny all you want but the truth will not go away.
http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html
From: Henry on
AllYou! wrote:
> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused:
>> AllYou! wrote:
>>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused:

>>>> Tell us why you "think" your imaginary compressed air remained
>>>> focused like a cannon shot when it entered the vast open office
>>>> spaces.

>>> It didn't have to do that

>> Compressed air can't do that if it enters a huge open area of
>> uncompressed air, but according to you, it did. That's why we
>> know you're nuts.

>>> It doesn't need to be tightly focused.

>> But it did.

> It never does. Pressure is equal across the entire pressure
> boundary,

You're contradicting yourself. According to you, when the
equal pressure encountered rows of windows of equal size and
strength, it blew out the side of the building in a tightly
focused explosion of pulverized concrete. Why didn't it blow
out entire rows of windows without the pulverized concrete
since the windows all had the same force applied to them?

--

http://911research.wtc7.net
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
http://www.ae911truth.org