Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: knews4u2chew on 6 Oct 2009 14:02 On Oct 6, 10:30 am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > In article <0e1a15b2-075e-40d7-a505-ff7bc71d3...(a)x6g2000prc.googlegroups.com>, > > > > <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >On Oct 6, 12:11=A0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > >> In article <d55f6c3a-0a74-4bd5-bb33-c4e66cdc8...(a)u36g2000prn.googlegroups= > >.com>, > > >> =A0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >On Oct 5, 2:33=3DA0pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> On Oct 5, 12:34=3DA0pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > > >> >> > On Oct 5, 10:41=3DA0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > > >> >> > > In article <a9b2b9b8-2a29-42f5- > > >> >> > <snip all your distractions> > > >> >> > > BEEP BEEP BEEP =3DA0 k00k makes ad hominem attack instead of addre= > >ssing=3D > >> > point =3DA0BEEP BEEP BEEP > >> >> > > BEEP BEEP BEEP =3DA0 k00k changes topics instead of addressing poi= > >nt =3D > >> >=3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 BEEP BEEP BEEP > > >> >> > > -- > >> >> > > Al Dykes > >> >> > > =3DA0News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else = > >is ad=3D > >> >vertising. > >> >> > > =3DA0 =3DA0 - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail > > >> >> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D3DPWgSaBT9hNU > >> >> > Prove these guys wrong. > > >> >> They've been proven wrong. > > >> >Liar. > >> >Where? > >> >By whom? > >> >You? > >> >With your arm waving? > > >> >>Physics. Laws of physics are inviolate. > > >> >Yup. > >> >Those building never could have collapsed that way. > >> >Physics proves it. > > >> >> There is no such thing as cartoon magic cilent and invisible > >> >> "explosives." Life is not a Wile E Coyote cartoon, dearie. > > >> >No one claims "invisible" anything except you. > >> >There is a thing called a "smoke screen" though. > >> >The WTC dust clouds are the perfect kind. > > >> Hundreds of thousands of people were close enough to hear demolition > >> explosions. =A0Nobody heard man-made explosives. There are no silent > >> demolition explosions. > > >> -- > >> Al Dykes > >> =A0News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advert= > >ising. > >> =A0 =A0 - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail > > >Except that you are a liar and many heard and were hit by explosions. > >http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=3Dexplosions+wtc&search_t.... > >&aq=3Df > >Many probably couldn't hear much "distinctly" with thousands of people > >screaming and yelling and sirens going off all around. > >Perfect cover for "cutting" charges that don't have to be loud. > >No "explosion" is needed. > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DWn-MCCZ3O1M > >Then, if you were far enough away across water to carry the sounds, > >you can hear and record the explosions. > >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3D6498070204870579516# > > Nobody reports hearing explosions that preceded a collapse and are > loud enough to be consistent with man-made demolition. > Liar. http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=wtc+basement+explosions&search_type=&aq=f > Nobody. You could prove me wring by naming ONE. Just one. Make it your > best case. Lets see where he was and what he heard. > I keep giving you videos of ten people. Pick one blind man. http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=wtc+explosions&search_type=&aq=f > The video from across the river has had the audio added. It's fake > according to the guy that shot it. > Liar. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6498070204870579516# > It explosions were heard by him, a few million New Yorkers would have > also heard it and it would be recorded on the sound tracks of > countless video cameras. > > No such audio exists. > Liar. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6498070204870579516# And then there is this at WTC 7. http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=WTC7+EXPLOSIONS&emb=0# > -- > Al Dykes So just keep lying and denying and I'll keep posting eyewitnesses and live video that proves you a liar.
From: Al Dykes on 6 Oct 2009 14:07 In article <91b13ebb-d195-4613-ba0a-835f5a220e02(a)z3g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Oct 6, 10:22=A0am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: >> Innews:hafgln$74m$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, >> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: >> >> > PV wrote: >> >> >> Also, all tornadoes are actually freight trains. >> >> > =A0Of course they are, kooker. And, of course, a 1500 degree >> > fire can heat steel to well over 2500 degrees, >> >> Again, you seem to enjoy displaying your ignorace. =A0Steel begins to >> weaken as it is heated. =A0There is no magic temperature below which >> it is 'strong', and over which is is 'weak'. =A0And it certainly does >> not have to melt before it fails. >> >> But I noticed that you snipped the quiestion I asked, and so I'll >> challenge you to answer it. >> >> If, when people say that the noises they heard 'sounded like >> explosions', it therefore means that there were explosions, then >> wouldn't it necessarily follow that when people say that controlled >> demolitions produce clouds of dust like those of volcanoes, that the >> clouds which were seen at those demolition sites were produced by >> volcanoes? =A0And so wouldn't that also mean that many of your kooky >> friends are making the case that the WTC towers were destroyed by >> volcanoes? > >You win the Stupid Contest. >Spook. >http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html "explosion" is just a good word for loud noise. Lots of people heard loud noises on 9/11. No noise heard by only one or a few people is loud enough to be caused by man-made demolition. Man-nade demolition would be heard by a million New Yorkers. No such noise was heard. -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
From: Al Dykes on 6 Oct 2009 14:14 In article <674d2381-4dff-4ed1-8354-c40692763936(a)u16g2000pru.googlegroups.com>, <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Oct 6, 10:30=A0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> In article <0e1a15b2-075e-40d7-a505-ff7bc71d3...(a)x6g2000prc.googlegroups.= >com>, >> >> >> >> =A0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >On Oct 6, 12:11=3DA0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> >> In article <d55f6c3a-0a74-4bd5-bb33-c4e66cdc8...(a)u36g2000prn.googlegro= >ups=3D >> >.com>, >> >> >> =3DA0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >On Oct 5, 2:33=3D3DA0pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Oct 5, 12:34=3D3DA0pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Oct 5, 10:41=3D3DA0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> >> >> >> > > In article <a9b2b9b8-2a29-42f5- >> >> >> >> > <snip all your distractions> >> >> >> >> > > BEEP BEEP BEEP =3D3DA0 k00k makes ad hominem attack instead of = >addre=3D >> >ssing=3D3D >> >> > point =3D3DA0BEEP BEEP BEEP >> >> >> > > BEEP BEEP BEEP =3D3DA0 k00k changes topics instead of addressin= >g poi=3D >> >nt =3D3D >> >> >=3D3DA0 =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0 BEEP BEEP BEEP >> >> >> >> > > -- >> >> >> > > Al Dykes >> >> >> > > =3D3DA0News is something someone wants to suppress, everything = >else =3D >> >is ad=3D3D >> >> >vertising. >> >> >> > > =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0 - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail >> >> >> >> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D3D3DPWgSaBT9hNU >> >> >> > Prove these guys wrong. >> >> >> >> They've been proven wrong. >> >> >> >Liar. >> >> >Where? >> >> >By whom? >> >> >You? >> >> >With your arm waving? >> >> >> >>Physics. Laws of physics are inviolate. >> >> >> >Yup. >> >> >Those building never could have collapsed that way. >> >> >Physics proves it. >> >> >> >> There is no such thing as cartoon magic cilent and invisible >> >> >> "explosives." Life is not a Wile E Coyote cartoon, dearie. >> >> >> >No one claims "invisible" anything except you. >> >> >There is a thing called a "smoke screen" though. >> >> >The WTC dust clouds are the perfect kind. >> >> >> Hundreds of thousands of people were close enough to hear demolition >> >> explosions. =3DA0Nobody heard man-made explosives. There are no silent >> >> demolition explosions. >> >> >> -- >> >> Al Dykes >> >> =3DA0News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is a= >dvert=3D >> >ising. >> >> =3DA0 =3DA0 - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail >> >> >Except that you are a liar and many heard and were hit by explosions. >> >http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=3D3Dexplosions+wtc&search_t.= >.. >> >&aq=3D3Df >> >Many probably couldn't hear much "distinctly" with thousands of people >> >screaming and yelling and sirens going off all around. >> >Perfect cover for "cutting" charges that don't have to be loud. >> >No "explosion" is needed. >> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D3DWn-MCCZ3O1M >> >Then, if you were far enough away across water to carry the sounds, >> >you can hear and record the explosions. >> >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3D3D6498070204870579516# >> >> Nobody reports hearing explosions that preceded a collapse and are >> loud enough to be consistent with man-made demolition. >> >Liar. >http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=3Dwtc+basement+explosions&searc= >h_type=3D&aq=3Df > >> Nobody. You could prove me wring by naming ONE. Just one. Make it your >> best case. Lets see where he was and what he heard. >> >I keep giving you videos of ten people. >Pick one blind man. >http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=3Dwtc+explosions&search_type=3D= >&aq=3Df > >> The video from across the river has had the audio added. It's fake >> according to the guy that shot it. >> >Liar. >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3D6498070204870579516# > >> It explosions were heard by him, a few million New Yorkers would have >> also heard it and it would be recorded on the sound tracks of >> countless video cameras. >> >> No such audio exists. >> >Liar. >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3D6498070204870579516# Broken URL. > >And then there is this at WTC 7. >http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=3DWTC7+EXPLOSIONS&emb=3D0# > I don't play 21 questions. Give me a name. -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
From: knews4u2chew on 6 Oct 2009 14:23 On Oct 6, 10:44 am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > In article <hafvcs$24...(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu>, > > > > Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > >AllYou! wrote: > >> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: > > >>> Tell us why you "think" your imaginary compressed air remained > >>> focused like a cannon shot when it entered the vast open office > >>> spaces. > > >> It didn't have to do that > > > Compressed air can't do that if it enters a huge open area of > >uncompressed air, but according to you, it did. That's why we > >know you're nuts. > > >> It doesn't need to be tightly focused. > > Nobody saw or heard anything consistent with man-made demolition at > WTC. > -- > Al Dykes "Nobody?" http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6498070204870579516# You can lie and deny all you want but the truth will not go away. http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html
From: Henry on 6 Oct 2009 14:23
AllYou! wrote: > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >> AllYou! wrote: >>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >>>> Tell us why you "think" your imaginary compressed air remained >>>> focused like a cannon shot when it entered the vast open office >>>> spaces. >>> It didn't have to do that >> Compressed air can't do that if it enters a huge open area of >> uncompressed air, but according to you, it did. That's why we >> know you're nuts. >>> It doesn't need to be tightly focused. >> But it did. > It never does. Pressure is equal across the entire pressure > boundary, You're contradicting yourself. According to you, when the equal pressure encountered rows of windows of equal size and strength, it blew out the side of the building in a tightly focused explosion of pulverized concrete. Why didn't it blow out entire rows of windows without the pulverized concrete since the windows all had the same force applied to them? -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org |