Prev: Request for Paper: J.P. Wesley "Terrestrial Aberration Cannot be Observed"
Next: Can we detect a blueshift of –c?
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 29 Apr 2010 15:01 Mass range 100 MeV - 1860 MeV Bin Heights reflect particle widths, i.e., their stability Experimental spectrum is compared with expectation values derived from M = (sqrt n)(revised Planck mass). My graphics skills are a bit weak, but the results are definitely worth a look. TO GET A FREE COPY, SEND ME AN EMAIL AND I WILL ATTACH A PDF TO THE REPLY. Best, RLO www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw
From: Jerry on 23 May 2010 08:56 On Apr 29, 2:01 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu> wrote: > Mass range 100 MeV - 1860 MeV > > Bin Heights reflect particle widths, i.e., their stability > > Experimental spectrum is compared with expectation values derived from > M = (sqrt n)(revised Planck mass). http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/images/Oldershaw_fantasy.PNG
From: Don Stockbauer on 1 Jun 2010 00:30
On Apr 29, 2:01 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu> wrote: > Mass range 100 MeV - 1860 MeV > > Bin Heights reflect particle widths, i.e., their stability > > Experimental spectrum is compared with expectation values derived from > M = (sqrt n)(revised Planck mass). > > My graphics skills are a bit weak, but the results are definitely > worth a look. > > TO GET A FREE COPY, SEND ME AN EMAIL AND I WILL ATTACH A PDF TO THE > REPLY. > > Best, > RLOwww.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw Send me an email for a pdf of a nude pecan tree. |