From: dlzc on
Dear funkenstein:

On Apr 28, 9:43 am, funkenstein <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been looking for this paper by the late
> J.P. Wesley for some time now, my
> institutional associaions however don't have
> access to the journal as it was published
> too long ago.
>
> So, I thought I'd try a request here because
> of the relevance to many recent posts. If
> anybody can get a copy for me and post to a
> public host I'd be very grateful.

I doubt this will be much help:
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0203056

David A. Smith
From: harald on
On Apr 28, 6:43 pm, funkenstein <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been looking for this paper by the late J.P. Wesley for some time
> now, my institutional associaions however don't have access to the
> journal as it was published too long ago.
>
> So, I thought I'd try a request here because of the relevance to many
> recent posts.
> If anybody can get a copy for me and post to a public host I'd be very
> grateful.
>
> Thank you -
>
> Foundations of Physics Letters
> Publisher       Springer Netherlands
> ISSN    0894-9875 (Print) 1572-9524 (Online)
> Issue   Volume 3, Number 4 / August, 1990

The one here below? The free preview (together with such papers as
indicated by dlzc) looks sufficient to me!

Cheers,
Harald
------------------------------------

J. P. Wesley1
(1) Weiherdammstrasse 24, 7712 Blumberg, Germany

Received: 9 March 1990
Abstract Because terrestrial sources radiate in all directions,
collimation cannot produce a beam fixed in direction relative to
absolute space. Therefore, terrestrial aberration, even though
present, cannot be observed; and terrestrial aberration cannot be used
to measure the absolute velocity of the closed laboratory
(contradicting a prior claim in this journal). In other words, the
large parallax of terrestrial sources frustrates the observation of
aberration.

Key words measuring absolute velocity - Bradley aberration

Apparently the proposed experiment [I] using Bradley
aberration in the closed laboratory to measure the absolute
velocity of the laboratory will not work. The principles
already stated remain valid; but an additional effect, an
artifact, which was overlooked in the original proposal,
will frustrate a positive result. In particular, it is
apparently impossible to obtain a terrestrial source that
will radiate in a single direction fixed relative to
absolute space. All known atomic and molecular light
sources radiate in all possible directions. The velocity of
light emitted is not affected by the absolute velocity of
the source. However, to obtain a unidirectional light beam,
that might be used to simulate starlight in the laboratory,
a mask, a collimator, or cavity (such as in a laser) must
be employed; and these devices unfortunately move with the
[..]