From: Bret Cahill on 1 Jun 2010 19:31 Or that's BP's excuse for "not knowing the flow rate." Accelerating 100 kg/sec to just 1 meter a second with some active sensor like a Coriolis wheel would take over 38 watts. Hey, 38 watts isn't just a signal. That's sustainability for a lot of people. Bret Cahill
From: Uncle Al on 1 Jun 2010 20:51 Bret Cahill wrote: > > Or that's BP's excuse for "not knowing the flow rate." > > Accelerating 100 kg/sec to just 1 meter a second with some active > sensor like a Coriolis wheel would take over 38 watts. > > Hey, 38 watts isn't just a signal. That's sustainability for a lot of > people. At 2300 psig, ocean bottom combustion with LOX pumped down has a certain charm. Thermal exchange during descent will vaporize the liquid. Assure Enviro-whiners that the LOX is all natural, captured from free-ranging air, and not some Franken-oxidizer made from recombinant cage-raised chemicals. BP, "Knock knock." NASA, "Who's there?" BP, "Givus atanka." NASA, "Givus atanka who?" BP, "Givus atanka LOX or we'll cover Cocoa Beach a foot thick in Permian asphalt emulsion." -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Quantum or EM Extra Richness - 5th Fundamental force?? Next: Energy v Information |