A Convenient Falsehood: Global Warming Is a Hoax*
in [Physics]
|
Prev: The crystals at the center of Earth RIDICULOUS Please learn some True Geology instead of raving on idiocies
Next: Aether Displacement
From: dannas on 21 May 2010 16:48 "Sam Wormley" <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:_omdnWZJQbNKdGvWnZ2dnUVZ_vydnZ2d(a)mchsi.com... > On 5/20/10 11:56 PM, Steady Eddy wrote: > >> How did they measure the 1.7 mm per year? How did they measure sea >> level in 1890? Frankly I doubt the methodology. There is no such thing >> as the thermal expansion of the ocen. Because water does not expand >> when it is heated. in the range of 32 to 86 F. Most ocean water falls >> into that range. >> >> This case is closed > > You never learn anything if you close your mind so quickly! > no real evidence or proof is presented anywhere, and averaging dose not cut it. wiki "weak law of large numbers"
From: dannas on 21 May 2010 16:53 "Sam Wormley" <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:rdOdnRlpfcStcmvWnZ2dnUVZ_vydnZ2d(a)mchsi.com... > On 5/21/10 1:13 AM, Dawlish wrote: >> On May 21, 1:10 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> A Convenient Falsehood: Global Warming Is a Hoax* >>> >>> Bob Hansen's presentation at the French National Assembly >>> >>> http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/2010/May2010_FrenchNationalAssembly.pdf >>> >>> 18 May, 2010 >> >> Here's the present temperatures. Knowing these, now tell me now GW is >> a hoax: >> >> http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/execute.csh?amsutemps+001 >> > > Daytime high temperatures are decreasing in Iowa over the last > ten years because of the increased dewpoints "resulting from global climate change" WRONG. > > > Here's some data from Iowa State University > http://www.meteor.iastate.edu/faculty/takle/presentations.html > > More from University of Iowa > > http://www.engineering.uiowa.edu/faculty-staff/profile-directory/cee/schnoor_j.php > > >
From: Surfer on 24 May 2010 22:22
On Fri, 21 May 2010 11:24:46 -0500, "dannas" <invalid(a)invalid.com> wrote: >> >> There needs to be a steadily rising price on carbon, with the money >> collected distributed to the public. >> >> I think that it is my job as a scientist > >WRONG, YOU ARE NOT A SCIENTIST, the presentation is NOT SCIENCE, it is >political conjecture. Well he is getting involved in politics, because of what he has learnt as a scientist. |