Prev: Collapse vs Demolition - Definitely Demolition
Next: Means, Motives, and Opportunities
From: Androcles on 2 Aug 2010 08:57

"Tom P" <werotizy(a)freent.dd> wrote in message
news:8bnphtFpehU1(a)mid.individual.net...
| On 08/02/2010 12:20 AM, Claudius Denk wrote:
| > On Aug 1, 2:39 pm, Roger Coppock<rcopp...(a)adnc.com> wrote:
| >> You seem to have trouble with the basic science.
| >> I expected many people on this forum would, that
| >> is why I included the following link in my original post:
| >>
| >> To get a grip on global warming science, Here are some lectures
| >> recorded in a classroom at a world class university:
| >>
| >> http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FA75A0DDB89ACCD7
| >
| > Roger, you can't say you weren't given an opportunity to make a
| > retraction.
|
| Read the first sentence in the Nature article again:
| "The evolution of the Earth's climate has been extensively studied1, and
| a strong link between increases in surface temperatures and greenhouse
| gases has been established"
|
| You could even try moving your lips at the same time.
|
| Now read this sentence:
|
| "Changes in the Earth's greenhouse effect can be detected from
| variations in the spectrum of outgoing longwave radiation, which is a
| measure of how the Earth cools to space and carries the imprint of the
| gases that are responsible for the greenhouse effect"
|
| Now try reading this sentence:
| "Our results provide direct experimental evidence for a significant
| increase in the Earth's greenhouse effect that is consistent with
| concerns over radiative forcing of climate."
|
| Get it?
You have cause and effect reversed. You won't get it.


|

From: Androcles on 2 Aug 2010 10:07

"Tom P" <werotizy(a)freent.dd> wrote in message
news:8bnujuFnqhU1(a)mid.individual.net...
| On 08/02/2010 01:46 AM, Last Post wrote:
| > On Aug 1, 7:08 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
| >> On 8/1/10 4:38 PM, Last Post wrote:
| >>
| >>> On Aug 1, 4:16 pm, Roger Coppock<rcopp...(a)adnc.com> wrote:
| >>
| >>>> An actual measurement of the climate forcing by
| >>>> CO2 and other greenhouse gases, and an estimate
| >>>> of the growth of that forcing over time.
| >>
| >>> Ø There is NO climate forcing by CO2 and
| >>> "other greenhouse gases"
| >>
| >>>> http://www.nature.com
| >>
| >>> Ø Nature is not a peer-reviewed journal
| >>
| >> THE NOAA ANNUAL GREENHOUSE GAS INDEX (AGGI)
| >> http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/
| >
| > Ø A total waste of time and space
| >
| >
| > GH GAS | TOTAL | NATUR |MAN MADE
| > ———————————————————————————————
| > H2O Vapour | 95.000% | 94.999% |0.001%
|
|
| 95% of what? Your figures are totally meaningless.
|
| The average water vapour column in the atmosphere is approximately 2.5
| centimeters - meaning if you condensed all the WV out of the atmosphere,
| it would amount to a puddle about 1 inch deep.

Bwhahahahahahaha! Is that what flooded Pakistan to a depth of 1 inch?
Clouds are just too big to be seen, right?
What a dumbfuck!
Some weirdoes are not kill-filed, they amuse me and I retain them for their
entertainment value as I would any chicken with two heads, either one of
which enables the dumb bird to scratch dirt, step back, look down, step
forward to the same spot and repeat the process eternally.


From: Desertphile on 2 Aug 2010 13:23
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:47:09 +0200, Tom P <werotizy(a)freent.dd>
wrote:

> On 08/02/2010 12:20 AM, Claudius Denk wrote:
> > On Aug 1, 2:39 pm, Roger Coppock<rcopp...(a)adnc.com> wrote:
> >> You seem to have trouble with the basic science.
> >> I expected many people on this forum would, that
> >> is why I included the following link in my original post:
> >>
> >> To get a grip on global warming science, Here are some lectures
> >> recorded in a classroom at a world class university:
> >>
> >> http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FA75A0DDB89ACCD7
> >
> > Roger, you can't say you weren't given an opportunity to make a
> > retraction.

> Read the first sentence in the Nature article again:
> "The evolution of the Earth's climate has been extensively studied1, and
> a strong link between increases in surface temperatures and greenhouse
> gases has been established"
>
> You could even try moving your lips at the same time.
>
> Now read this sentence:
>
> "Changes in the Earth's greenhouse effect can be detected from
> variations in the spectrum of outgoing longwave radiation, which is a
> measure of how the Earth cools to space and carries the imprint of the
> gases that are responsible for the greenhouse effect"
>
> Now try reading this sentence:
> "Our results provide direct experimental evidence for a significant
> increase in the Earth's greenhouse effect that is consistent with
> concerns over radiative forcing of climate."
>
> Get it?

In fact there are super-cooled microwave collectors currently in
orbit that are measuring the radiative effects that the increase
in Carbon Dioxide has caused and is causing. The devices directly
observe CO2 working as a greenhouse gas, and doing so exactly as
physicists (chemists) and climatologists predicted.

Meanwhile, FOX obeyers wail "Is NOT!" with their eyes tightly
shut.


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
From: Androcles on 3 Aug 2010 04:42

"Tom P" <werotizy(a)freent.dd> wrote in message
news:8bpubnFnudU1(a)mid.individual.net...
| On 08/01/2010 11:38 PM, Last Post wrote:
| > On Aug 1, 4:16 pm, Roger Coppock<rcopp...(a)adnc.com> wrote:
| >
| >> An actual measurement of the climate forcing by
| >> CO2 and other greenhouse gases, and an estimate
| >> of the growth of that forcing over time.
| >
| > � There is NO climate forcing by CO2 and
| > "other greenhouse gases"
|
| So why is Venus so hot?
=========================================
Closer to the Sun.
Why is Mars so cold (-63 degrees C) with its 95% CO2 atmosphere?
Further from the Sun.
Why are you so stupid, Tomp?


From: Desertphile on 3 Aug 2010 11:10
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 09:21:27 +0200, Tom P <werotizy(a)freent.dd>
wrote:

> On 08/01/2010 11:38 PM, Last Post wrote:
> > On Aug 1, 4:16 pm, Roger Coppock<rcopp...(a)adnc.com> wrote:

> >> An actual measurement of the climate forcing by
> >> CO2 and other greenhouse gases, and an estimate
> >> of the growth of that forcing over time.

> > There is NO climate forcing by CO2 and "other greenhouse gases"

LOL! "Earth is flat!"

> So why is Venus so hot?

The gods did it.


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Collapse vs Demolition - Definitely Demolition
Next: Means, Motives, and Opportunities