Prev: The WOW was Re: Your magic cubicle was Re: Paging Cpt. Nemo was Re:Time Travel Vacations was Re: Pretending was Re: Multi-media was Re: Characterswas Re: Modelling
Next: Bandwidth was Re: The WOW was Re: Your magic cubicle was Re: PagingCpt. Nemo was Re: Time Travel Vacations was Re: Pretending was Re: Multi-mediawas Re: Characters was Re: Modelling
From: funkenstein on 27 Jun 2010 12:03
On Jun 27, 4:30 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:
> On Jun 27, 7:02 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 27, 12:01 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > anyway
> > psychopth
> > that is why i copyrighted it !!!
>
> You understand as little of copyright law as you do of physics. There
> is no such thing as copyright of an "idea". Also, you should know,
> that there are countries that aren't parties to International
> agreements on Intellectual Property.

Amen to that! The sooner we can all follow suit, the sooner humanity
can start to live up to its potential.

> There are also countries, such as
> China, which steal almost 100% of the software.in the country. Before
> you know it, Tom Potter will make get a plant in China (where he
> lives) to print millions of t-shirts with the slogan "No Mass - No
> Real Physics", and you won't get a cent.
>
> > it is registered and thousands of people saw the original
> > and its date
>
> Doesn't matter - especially once you're dead. Look up software and
> book piracy rates in East Asia.
>

You'll find people are keen to use public information anywhere in the
world.

From: Y.Porat on 27 Jun 2010 14:02
On Jun 27, 6:03 pm, funkenstein <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 27, 4:30 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 27, 7:02 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 27, 12:01 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > [snip]
>
> > > anyway
> > > psychopth
> > > that is why i copyrighted it !!!
>
> > You understand as little of copyright law as you do of physics. There
> > is no such thing as copyright of an "idea". Also, you should know,
> > that there are countries that aren't parties to International
> > agreements on Intellectual Property.
>
> Amen to that!  The sooner we can all follow suit, the sooner humanity
> can start to live up to its potential.
>
> > There are also countries, such as
> > China, which steal almost 100% of the software.in the country. Before
> > you know it, Tom Potter will make get a plant in China (where he
> > lives) to print millions of t-shirts with the slogan "No Mass - No
> > Real Physics", and you won't get a cent.
>
> > > it is registered and thousands of people saw the original
> > > and its date
>
> > Doesn't matter - especially once you're dead. Look up software and
> > book piracy rates in East Asia.
>
> You'll find people are keen to use public information anywhere in the
> world.

-----------------
Mr funkenstein

i dont care much for money profits
i care at least for
decency and recognition
for creative peole who contribute for advance of science
just forget if i am right or wrong
but in case someone was contrintes something to science
do you agree that he deserves
at least recognition in his contribution??

jsut imagine that YOU wa sworking hard and manyyears on some
innovation or unprecedented finding
whould youlike that
someone else that got nothing withit
will stole your achevement
and felate it to himself
how whould you feel or react to that ??
what kind of a message is such 'standard of behavior' for peole
(including the young generation) who wish to work or even work hard
hard
in order to ccreate something new ???

TIA
Y.Porat
----------------------------
Y.Porat
-----------------------
From: funkenstein on 28 Jun 2010 03:58
On Jun 27, 8:02 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 27, 6:03 pm, funkenstein <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 27, 4:30 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 27, 7:02 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 27, 12:01 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > [snip]
>
> > > > anyway
> > > > psychopth
> > > > that is why i copyrighted it !!!
>
> > > You understand as little of copyright law as you do of physics. There
> > > is no such thing as copyright of an "idea". Also, you should know,
> > > that there are countries that aren't parties to International
> > > agreements on Intellectual Property.
>
> > Amen to that!  The sooner we can all follow suit, the sooner humanity
> > can start to live up to its potential.
>
> > > There are also countries, such as
> > > China, which steal almost 100% of the software.in the country. Before
> > > you know it, Tom Potter will make get a plant in China (where he
> > > lives) to print millions of t-shirts with the slogan "No Mass - No
> > > Real Physics", and you won't get a cent.
>
> > > > it is registered and thousands of people saw the original
> > > > and its date
>
> > > Doesn't matter - especially once you're dead. Look up software and
> > > book piracy rates in East Asia.
>
> > You'll find people are keen to use public information anywhere in the
> > world.
>
> -----------------
> Mr funkenstein
>
> i dont care much   for money profits
> i care at least for
> decency and recognition
> for creative peole  who contribute for advance of science
> just forget if i am right or wrong
> but in case someone was contrintes something to science
> do you agree that he deserves
> at least recognition in his contribution??

Yes!

>
> jsut imagine that  YOU wa sworking hard and manyyears on some
> innovation or unprecedented finding
> whould youlike that
> someone else that got nothing withit
> will stole your achevement
> and felate it to himself
> how whould you feel or react to that   ??
> what kind of  a message is  such 'standard of behavior'   for peole
> (including the young generation) who  wish to work or even work hard
> hard
> in  order to ccreate something new ???
>

Are you confusing intellectual property laws with plagiarism?
I see nothing that -discourages- hard work and innovation more than
intellectual property laws.
Your hard work here is now owned by google, thanks to that relic of
monarchy, that anti free-trade practice of claiming an idea can be
owned, which claims that what was already made public is still
private.

I apologize for the off-topic rant :)


> TIA
> Y.Porat
> ----------------------------
> Y.Porat
> -----------------------

From: Y.Porat on 28 Jun 2010 08:13
On Jun 28, 9:58 am, funkenstein <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 27, 8:02 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 27, 6:03 pm, funkenstein <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 27, 4:30 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 27, 7:02 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jun 27, 12:01 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > [snip]
>
> > > > > anyway
> > > > > psychopth
> > > > > that is why i copyrighted it !!!
>
> > > > You understand as little of copyright law as you do of physics. There
> > > > is no such thing as copyright of an "idea". Also, you should know,
> > > > that there are countries that aren't parties to International
> > > > agreements on Intellectual Property.
>
> > > Amen to that!  The sooner we can all follow suit, the sooner humanity
> > > can start to live up to its potential.
>
> > > > There are also countries, such as
> > > > China, which steal almost 100% of the software.in the country. Before
> > > > you know it, Tom Potter will make get a plant in China (where he
> > > > lives) to print millions of t-shirts with the slogan "No Mass - No
> > > > Real Physics", and you won't get a cent.
>
> > > > > it is registered and thousands of people saw the original
> > > > > and its date
>
> > > > Doesn't matter - especially once you're dead. Look up software and
> > > > book piracy rates in East Asia.
>
> > > You'll find people are keen to use public information anywhere in the
> > > world.
>
> > -----------------
> > Mr funkenstein
>
> > i dont care much   for money profits
> > i care at least for
> > decency and recognition
> > for creative peole  who contribute for advance of science
> > just forget if i am right or wrong
> > but in case someone was contrintes something to science
> > do you agree that he deserves
> > at least recognition in his contribution??
>
> Yes!
>
>
>
> > jsut imagine that  YOU wa sworking hard and manyyears on some
> > innovation or unprecedented finding
> > whould youlike that
> > someone else that got nothing withit
> > will stole your achevement
> > and felate it to himself
> > how whould you feel or react to that   ??
> > what kind of  a message is  such 'standard of behavior'   for peole
> > (including the young generation) who  wish to work or even work hard
> > hard
> > in  order to ccreate something new ???
>
> Are you confusing intellectual property laws with plagiarism?
> I see nothing that -discourages- hard work and innovation more than
> intellectual property laws.
> Your hard work here is now owned by google, thanks to that relic of
> monarchy, that anti free-trade practice of claiming an idea can be
> owned, which claims that what was already made public is still
> private.
>
> I apologize for the off-topic rant :)
>
> > TIA
> > Y.Porat
> > ----------------------------
> > Y.Porat
> > -----------------------

i dont talk about ANY PROPERY ASPECTS!!
i am talking about
being thankful for the innovator
AND THAT ALL !!!

iow
to mention his mane while using it !!!

(AND NOT RELATING IT TO SOME ONE ELSE !!!))

is it an exaggerated request ??
dont you think -- that it is
a minimal ***human** behavior ???

(human means NOT ANIMAL PIG
behavior !! (:-) ))

ATB
Y.Porat
------------------------------------
From: hanson on 28 Jun 2010 14:51
--- AHAHAHAHA... ahahahah... AHAHAHAHA... -----
>
Yehiel "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote:
flunkystein <luke.saul(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Robert Higgins <robert_higgins(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Robert Niggins <robert_higgins(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > [snip]
>
Addressing Higgie, Yehiel wrote:
.... anyway psychopth, that is why i copyrighted it !!!
>
Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
You understand as little of copyright law as you do of physics.
There is no such thing as copyright of an "idea". Also, you
should know, that there are countries that aren't parties to
International agreements on Intellectual Property.
>
funkenstein aka Flunky <luke.saul(a)gmail.com> wrote
Amen to that! The sooner we can all follow suit, the sooner
humanity can start to live up to its potential.
>
hanson wrote:
"humanity, to live up to its potential"?... ahahaha.. AHAHA..
What Potential?.. Are you the new Messiah or Mahdi, with
another New Age religion that will fuckup humankind for
another 2 millennia.... with **Flunky's Potential***... ahaha..
good one.. ahaha... AHAHAHA...
>
Robert Higgins aka Higgie, the Niggie wrote:
[snip] ...Tom Potter will make get a plant in China (where
he lives) to print millions of t-shirts with the slogan
"No Mass - No Real Physics", and Porat won't get a cent.
>
hanson wrote:
Wrong Niggie. Potter said that he is a moral man, who
unlike you, will share every cent with Porat
>
Addressing Niggie, Yehiel wrote:
"No Mass - No Real Physics" is registered and thousands
of people saw the original and its date
>
Higgie, the Niggie wrote:
Doesn't matter - especially once you're dead. Look up
software and book piracy rates in East Asia.
>
Yehiel wrote:
Mr funkenstein, jsut imagine that YOU wa sworking hard and
manyyears on some innovation or unprecedented finding
whould youlike that someone else that got nothing withit
will stole your achevement and **felate it** to himself how
whould you feel or react to that ??
what kind of a message is such 'standard of behavior'
for peole (including the young generation) who wish to work
or even work hard hard in order to ccreate something new ???
>
hanson wrote:
Now that is heavy, Yehiel, my old friend from Israel. You also
said that you are not a "native English speaker". So, let me
help you here for a moment. You forgot an "l" in your "felate".
The correct spelling is "fellate".
But then you should have stopped with your advice and not
inquired "how they feel after they fellate".... and talk about
some hard, hard fellation standard for young people...
>
Never the less, Yehie and you 2 Anti-Semites, Niggie
and Flunky... THANKS for the laughs... ahahahanson
>
PS:
"to parrot" is copyrighted by Porat too.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: The WOW was Re: Your magic cubicle was Re: Paging Cpt. Nemo was Re:Time Travel Vacations was Re: Pretending was Re: Multi-media was Re: Characterswas Re: Modelling
Next: Bandwidth was Re: The WOW was Re: Your magic cubicle was Re: PagingCpt. Nemo was Re: Time Travel Vacations was Re: Pretending was Re: Multi-mediawas Re: Characters was Re: Modelling