From: occam on
pixturesk(a)gmail.com wrote:
> Gilhooley wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 08:47:29 -0800, Dan wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 09:22:02 -0600, Bob Adkins <bobad(a)charter.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have tried 2 fairly new disk defrag utilities recently:
>>>> "SmartDefrag" by IOBit
>>>>
>>>> Anyone tried either of them? Am I missing anything?
>>> I've been using Smart Defrag for quite a while. It's resident, so it
>>> does on-the-fly defragging. My apps keep opening very snappily, so
>>> Smart Defrag must be doing something right. It's caused zero problems.
>>> Obviously, I'm happy with it and am continuing to use it until
>>> something I like better comes by. But I'm not looking for anything.
>>>
>>> As a alternative, DirMS and Buzzsaw provide defrag and resident-defrag
>>> services without a GUI.
>> Dirk Paehl has excellent GUI for DIRMS. You can get it here:
>>
>> http://www.paehl.de/blog/index.php?entry=entry060226-115935
>>
>> --
>> Home is where the 127.0.0.1 is
>>
>> e-mail (ROT-13):
>> tvyubbyrl.g.n(a)tznvy.pbz
>
> I have been using Diskeeper Lite, the final freeware version, can't
> remember where I got it, works much faster, completely, than the
> Norton Systemworks Utilities version of its defrag program that I have
> been using on Win98SE. A lot of the free defrag programs folks are
> mentioning here only work with Win 2000, XP.
>

FYI, the Win XP default defragger *IS* Diskeeper Lite, minus the 'nag
window'
From: Kulgan on

George wrote:
> If you have Windows XP, my understanding is that the defrag utility
> that comes with it uses a version of Diskeeper. I think it would be
> difficult to find something better.
>
> George

If it is Diskeeper its an archaic version. The current version (which I
use on all my PCs) is awesome and much better than the Windows rubbish.
Diskeeper actually made a knackered disk (wouldn't boot reliably) 100%
reliable. Not sure how it worked, but it did! So although you have to
pay for it, I highly recommend it!

Kulgan.

From: Caesar Romano on
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 11:08:43 -0600, Bob Adkins <bobad(a)charter.net>
wrote Re Re: A Pair of Freeware Defrag Programs:

>On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:30:31 +0000, Saxman
>
>
>>Probably no better than windows built-in utility. Does state how much
>>more efficient the computer is in percentage terms.
>
>Probably true.
>
>In fact, both programs are probably just a shell for Windows Defrag.
>But SmartDefrag makes it easy to get to the options without having to
>use complicated command line switches.

d:\tmp0>defrag /?

Windows Disk Defragmenter
Copyright (c) 2001 Microsoft Corp. and Executive Software
International, Inc.
Usage:
defrag <volume> [-a] [-f] [-v] [-?]
volume drive letter or mount point (d: or d:\vol\mountpoint)
-a Analyze only
-f Force defragmentation even if free space is low
-v Verbose output
-? Display this help text


That doesn't look too complicated to me.
From: mrrhum on
occam <occam(a)razor.dot.com> wrote in news:459ab209(a)news.vo.lu:

> pixturesk(a)gmail.com wrote:
>> Gilhooley wrote:
>>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 08:47:29 -0800, Dan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 09:22:02 -0600, Bob Adkins <bobad(a)charter.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have tried 2 fairly new disk defrag utilities recently:
>>>>> "SmartDefrag" by IOBit
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone tried either of them? Am I missing anything?
>>>> I've been using Smart Defrag for quite a while. It's resident, so it
>>>> does on-the-fly defragging. My apps keep opening very snappily, so
>>>> Smart Defrag must be doing something right. It's caused zero
problems.
>>>> Obviously, I'm happy with it and am continuing to use it until
>>>> something I like better comes by. But I'm not looking for anything.
>>>>
>>>> As a alternative, DirMS and Buzzsaw provide defrag and resident-
defrag
>>>> services without a GUI.
>>> Dirk Paehl has excellent GUI for DIRMS. You can get it here:
>>>
>>> http://www.paehl.de/blog/index.php?entry=entry060226-115935
>>>
>>> --
>>> Home is where the 127.0.0.1 is
>>>
>>> e-mail (ROT-13):
>>> tvyubbyrl.g.n(a)tznvy.pbz
>>
>> I have been using Diskeeper Lite, the final freeware version, can't
>> remember where I got it, works much faster, completely, than the
>> Norton Systemworks Utilities version of its defrag program that I have
>> been using on Win98SE. A lot of the free defrag programs folks are
>> mentioning here only work with Win 2000, XP.
>>
>
> FYI, the Win XP default defragger *IS* Diskeeper Lite, minus the 'nag
> window'

FWI:

C:\WINDOWS\system32\defrag.exe
on Microsoft Windows XP Workstation version 5.2600


File Version Information :

Version language : English (United States)
CompanyName : Microsoft Corp. and Executive Software
International, Inc.
FileDescription : Disk Defragmenter Module
FileVersion : 5.1.2600.2180 (xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158)
InternalName : Defrag.EXE
LegalCopyright : �2001 Microsoft Corp. and Executive Software
Int'l, Inc.
OriginalFilename : Defrag.EXE
ProductName : Windows Disk Defragmenter
ProductVersion : 5.1.2600.2180

C:\Program Files\Executive Software\Diskeeper\DfrgNTFS.exe
on Microsoft Windows XP Workstation version 5.2600


File Version Information :

Version language : English (United States)
CompanyName : Executive Software International, Inc.
FileDescription : DFRGNTFS.EXE
FileVersion : 9.0.528.0
InternalName : DFRGNTFS
LegalCopyright : � 1995-2005 Executive Software Int'l, Inc.
OriginalFilename : DFRGNTFS
ProductName : Diskeeper (TM) Disk Defragmenter
ProductVersion : 9.0.528.0

Hmm...?

--mrrhum

From: FredW on
pixturesk(a)gmail.com heeft uiteengezet op 2-1-2007 :
>
> I have been using Diskeeper Lite, the final freeware version, can't
> remember where I got it,

This one?
http://www.majorgeeks.com/Diskeeper_Lite_d1207.html

--
Fred Wening (NL)
http://www.stadskanaalrail.nl/


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Giveawayoftheday
Next: FreeDNSupdate stopped working.