Prev: Giveawayoftheday
Next: FreeDNSupdate stopped working.
From: pixturesk on 3 Jan 2007 18:22

FredW wrote:
> pixturesk(a)gmail.com heeft uiteengezet op 2-1-2007 :
> >
> > I have been using Diskeeper Lite, the final freeware version, can't
> > remember where I got it,
>
> This one?
> http://www.majorgeeks.com/Diskeeper_Lite_d1207.html
>
> --
> Fred Wening (NL)
> http://www.stadskanaalrail.nl/

This appears to be the correct link, can't locate the version number on
my software, but I think this is the only free version of Diskeeper.
Works great for me.

From: Bob Adkins on 3 Jan 2007 21:59
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:53:08 -0600, Caesar Romano <Spam(a)uce.gov>
wrote:

>d:\tmp0>defrag /?
>
>Windows Disk Defragmenter
>Copyright (c) 2001 Microsoft Corp. and Executive Software
>International, Inc.
>Usage:
>defrag <volume> [-a] [-f] [-v] [-?]
> volume drive letter or mount point (d: or d:\vol\mountpoint)
> -a Analyze only
> -f Force defragmentation even if free space is low
> -v Verbose output
> -? Display this help text
>
>
>That doesn't look too complicated to me.

But you're a boy genius. And you probably touch type too.
-

Bob
From: Achim Nolcken Lohse on 7 Jan 2007 02:08
On 3 Jan 2007 15:22:27 -0800, "pixturesk(a)gmail.com"
<pixturesk(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>
>FredW wrote:
>> pixturesk(a)gmail.com heeft uiteengezet op 2-1-2007 :
>> >
>> > I have been using Diskeeper Lite, the final freeware version, can't
>> > remember where I got it,
>>
>> This one?
>> http://www.majorgeeks.com/Diskeeper_Lite_d1207.html
>>
>> --
>> Fred Wening (NL)
>> http://www.stadskanaalrail.nl/
>
>This appears to be the correct link, can't locate the version number on
>my software, but I think this is the only free version of Diskeeper.
>Works great for me.
>
Nope, it's not. This is Version 7 of Diskeeper Lite, circa 2002, which
I use myself on Win98SE. It's also a bit flakey. It pops up for no
reason on occasion to announce that one of my USB flash cards has "1"
excess fragment(!!) for instance. And there have been times when it
just ran a drive till I thought it would trash it without any sign of
achieving anything. But so far, my drives have survived, and it is
easier to use than the stock Win98 program.

A year ago or so, I read of a version 9, and I believe it was bundled
in some MS utility pack, which for some reason I wasn't able to
download with my ancient browser because of MS's configuration
demands.

BTW - since someone mentioned that the native Win2K browser is all you
need, I'd pass on a friend's observation that defragging on a regular
basis with Win2k's native defragmenter corrupts mp3 files. Hopefully,
this is not the case with the later vintage Diskeeper.



--

Achim
_____/)
axethetax
From: Achim Nolcken Lohse on 7 Jan 2007 02:38
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:08:47 GMT, lohsea(a)3web.nettax (Achim Nolcken
Lohse) wrote:

>On 3 Jan 2007 15:22:27 -0800, "pixturesk(a)gmail.com"
><pixturesk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>FredW wrote:
>>> pixturesk(a)gmail.com heeft uiteengezet op 2-1-2007 :
>>> >
>>> > I have been using Diskeeper Lite, the final freeware version, can't
>>> > remember where I got it,
>>>
>>> This one?
>>> http://www.majorgeeks.com/Diskeeper_Lite_d1207.html
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fred Wening (NL)
>>> http://www.stadskanaalrail.nl/
>>
>>This appears to be the correct link, can't locate the version number on
>>my software, but I think this is the only free version of Diskeeper.
>>Works great for me.
>>
>Nope, it's not. This is Version 7 of Diskeeper Lite, circa 2002, which
>I use myself on Win98SE. It's also a bit flakey. It pops up for no
>reason on occasion to announce that one of my USB flash cards has "1"
>excess fragment(!!) for instance. And there have been times when it
>just ran a drive till I thought it would trash it without any sign of
>achieving anything. But so far, my drives have survived, and it is
>easier to use than the stock Win98 program.
>
>A year ago or so, I read of a version 9, and I believe it was bundled
>in some MS utility pack, which for some reason I wasn't able to
>download with my ancient browser because of MS's configuration
>demands.

Correction - it turns out Diskeeper Lite 9 is bundled in an Intel
utilty package, and was reported in ACF previously. It's still
available for free download at the URL below. The only catch is that
its description refers only to systems using W2K or XP, not Win98 or
ME.

Has anyone here tried it on 98? It's an 89MB download for the bundle,
and there's a report that on W2K you have to uninstall the earlier
Diskeeper version to install V 9.

http://www.intel.com/design/motherbd/software/idu/

--

Achim
_____/)
axethetax
From: eForm on 7 Jan 2007 06:49

Achim Nolcken Lohse wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:08:47 GMT, lohsea(a)3web.nettax (Achim Nolcken
> Lohse) wrote:
>
> >On 3 Jan 2007 15:22:27 -0800, "pixturesk(a)gmail.com"
> ><pixturesk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>FredW wrote:
> >>> pixturesk(a)gmail.com heeft uiteengezet op 2-1-2007 :
> >>> >
> >>> > I have been using Diskeeper Lite, the final freeware version, can't
> >>> > remember where I got it,
> >>>
> >>> This one?
> >>> http://www.majorgeeks.com/Diskeeper_Lite_d1207.html
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Fred Wening (NL)
> >>> http://www.stadskanaalrail.nl/
> >>
> >>This appears to be the correct link, can't locate the version number on
> >>my software, but I think this is the only free version of Diskeeper.
> >>Works great for me.
> >>
> >Nope, it's not. This is Version 7 of Diskeeper Lite, circa 2002, which
> >I use myself on Win98SE. It's also a bit flakey. It pops up for no
> >reason on occasion to announce that one of my USB flash cards has "1"
> >excess fragment(!!) for instance. And there have been times when it
> >just ran a drive till I thought it would trash it without any sign of
> >achieving anything. But so far, my drives have survived, and it is
> >easier to use than the stock Win98 program.
> >
> >A year ago or so, I read of a version 9, and I believe it was bundled
> >in some MS utility pack, which for some reason I wasn't able to
> >download with my ancient browser because of MS's configuration
> >demands.
>
> Correction - it turns out Diskeeper Lite 9 is bundled in an Intel
> utilty package, and was reported in ACF previously. It's still
> available for free download at the URL below. The only catch is that
> its description refers only to systems using W2K or XP, not Win98 or
> ME.
>
> Has anyone here tried it on 98? It's an 89MB download for the bundle,
> and there's a report that on W2K you have to uninstall the earlier
> Diskeeper version to install V 9.
>
> http://www.intel.com/design/motherbd/software/idu/
>
> --
>
> Achim
> _____/)
> axethetax


http://www.majorgeeks.com/Diskeeper_Lite_d1207.html This version of DK
Lite is working fine on WIN98 SE.

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Giveawayoftheday
Next: FreeDNSupdate stopped working.