A brief history of time and science
in [Physics]
|
From: Igor on 14 Jun 2010 12:56 On Jun 13, 11:56 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > It reallly should be a short history of sciences mistakes. Galileo is > considered father of science. But if you look at what happened in the > history of science you see that it is mainly getting one thing right > and then everything else a mistake. But we have not got away from that > history of mistakes. > > Science is using extrapolation to go forward but it is creating > mistake after mistake. We need a new science completely. Extrapolation > is not creativity. There is more work to creativity. > > Mitch Raemsch If you actually understood science the way you claim to do, you would understand that the mistakes are a big part of the science. Dare to be wrong! And we also need to beware of individuals such as yourself, who claim to never make mistakes.
From: Raymond Yohros on 14 Jun 2010 13:46 On Jun 14, 11:56 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > On Jun 13, 11:56 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > It reallly should be a short history of sciences mistakes. Galileo is > > considered father of science. But if you look at what happened in the > > history of science you see that it is mainly getting one thing right > > and then everything else a mistake. But we have not got away from that > > history of mistakes. > > > Science is using extrapolation to go forward but it is creating > > mistake after mistake. We need a new science completely. Extrapolation > > is not creativity. There is more work to creativity. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > If you actually understood science the way you claim to do, you would > understand that the mistakes are a big part of the science. Dare to > be wrong! And we also need to beware of individuals such as yourself, > who claim to never make mistakes. > he is so blind he doesn't get that the worst most irreversible kind of mistakes have been done by man for thinking they have a monopoly over g-d! r.y
From: BURT on 14 Jun 2010 19:22 On Jun 14, 2:35 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 13, 11:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 13, 9:15 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 13, 10:56 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > It reallly should be a short history of sciences mistakes. Galileo is > > > > considered father of science. But if you look at what happened in the > > > > history of science you see that it is mainly getting one thing right > > > > and then everything else a mistake. But we have not got away from that > > > > history of mistakes. > > > > > Science is using extrapolation to go forward but it is creating > > > > mistake after mistake. We need a new science completely. Extrapolation > > > > is not creativity. There is more work to creativity. > > > > Nah. Current science is fine. "Mitch" or ""BURT" or whoever you are > > > is the mistake. > > > Current science is a bunch of mistakes mostly of extrapolation. > > > Creativity is what will make science fine. But that takes work that > > intellectuals are not honest about. > > Go fly a kite.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Please take note of the short history of science and the legacy of its mistakes. It is no different now from what was just behind us. Its worst mistake was to doubt Einstein. Einstein will be proven to be the most objective in science by the future. Mitch Raemsch
From: Don Stockbauer on 15 Jun 2010 19:54
On Jun 14, 6:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 14, 2:35 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 13, 11:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 13, 9:15 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 13, 10:56 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > It reallly should be a short history of sciences mistakes. Galileo is > > > > > considered father of science. But if you look at what happened in the > > > > > history of science you see that it is mainly getting one thing right > > > > > and then everything else a mistake. But we have not got away from that > > > > > history of mistakes. > > > > > > Science is using extrapolation to go forward but it is creating > > > > > mistake after mistake. We need a new science completely. Extrapolation > > > > > is not creativity. There is more work to creativity. > > > > > Nah. Current science is fine. "Mitch" or ""BURT" or whoever you are > > > > is the mistake. > > > > Current science is a bunch of mistakes mostly of extrapolation. > > > > Creativity is what will make science fine. But that takes work that > > > intellectuals are not honest about. > > > Go fly a kite.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Please take note of the short history of science and the legacy of its > mistakes. It is no different now from what was just behind us. Its > worst mistake was to doubt Einstein. > > Einstein will be proven to be the most objective in science by the > future. > Science started with the Big Bang. |