A brief history of time and science
in [Physics]
|
From: BURT on 13 Jun 2010 23:56 It reallly should be a short history of sciences mistakes. Galileo is considered father of science. But if you look at what happened in the history of science you see that it is mainly getting one thing right and then everything else a mistake. But we have not got away from that history of mistakes. Science is using extrapolation to go forward but it is creating mistake after mistake. We need a new science completely. Extrapolation is not creativity. There is more work to creativity. Mitch Raemsch
From: Don Stockbauer on 14 Jun 2010 00:15 On Jun 13, 10:56 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > It reallly should be a short history of sciences mistakes. Galileo is > considered father of science. But if you look at what happened in the > history of science you see that it is mainly getting one thing right > and then everything else a mistake. But we have not got away from that > history of mistakes. > > Science is using extrapolation to go forward but it is creating > mistake after mistake. We need a new science completely. Extrapolation > is not creativity. There is more work to creativity. Nah. Current science is fine. "Mitch" or ""BURT" or whoever you are is the mistake.
From: BURT on 14 Jun 2010 00:52 On Jun 13, 9:15 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 13, 10:56 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > It reallly should be a short history of sciences mistakes. Galileo is > > considered father of science. But if you look at what happened in the > > history of science you see that it is mainly getting one thing right > > and then everything else a mistake. But we have not got away from that > > history of mistakes. > > > Science is using extrapolation to go forward but it is creating > > mistake after mistake. We need a new science completely. Extrapolation > > is not creativity. There is more work to creativity. > > Nah. Current science is fine. "Mitch" or ""BURT" or whoever you are > is the mistake. Current science is a bunch of mistakes mostly of extrapolation. Creativity is what will make science fine. But that takes work that intellectuals are not honest about. Mitch Raemsch
From: Don Stockbauer on 14 Jun 2010 05:35 On Jun 13, 11:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 13, 9:15 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 13, 10:56 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > It reallly should be a short history of sciences mistakes. Galileo is > > > considered father of science. But if you look at what happened in the > > > history of science you see that it is mainly getting one thing right > > > and then everything else a mistake. But we have not got away from that > > > history of mistakes. > > > > Science is using extrapolation to go forward but it is creating > > > mistake after mistake. We need a new science completely. Extrapolation > > > is not creativity. There is more work to creativity. > > > Nah. Current science is fine. "Mitch" or ""BURT" or whoever you are > > is the mistake. > > Current science is a bunch of mistakes mostly of extrapolation. > > Creativity is what will make science fine. But that takes work that > intellectuals are not honest about. Go fly a kite.
From: purple on 14 Jun 2010 07:57
On 6/13/2010 11:52 PM, BURT wrote: > Creativity is what will make science fine. But that takes work that > intellectuals are not honest about. When creativity is work it isn't insight. |