From: bobby on 6 Dec 2009 19:30 I know. But it's just so close. No log errors any longer, spent all weekend fixing shiit, I just hate to give up on this. Is the fact that the domain is a .com account a deal breaker? Routing group, can't I clean this up, power management, a GPO. ? ugh. Those ba*stards! Believe me, I'm not getting paid enough. So close yet so far... "Larry Struckmeyer[SBS-MVP]" <lstruckmeyer(a)mis-wizards.com> wrote in message news:4e6835156b608cc44bb12167153(a)news.microsoft.com... > > Ok, under those conditions you are on the right track. If the domain > name, the server name and so on are not worth saving, then ditch it. And > certainly a FQDN is a bad/rookie mistake. > > - > Larry > Please post the resolution to your > issue so others may benefit > - > Get Your SBS Health Check at > www.sbsbpa.com > > >> I probably wouldn't want to do that. If I reformatted then I would >> change the domain name, server IP and some other things. I like to >> have a .local domain and not an FQDN on the server. I just bought a >> terabyte drive for backup in case. I have not problem taking them down >> for a day or two over the weekend, but is there any decent way to >> recover these last few things.? >> >> "Larry Struckmeyer[SBS-MVP]" <lstruckmeyer(a)mis-wizards.com> wrote in >> message news:4e6835156b528cc44b94bd8888b(a)news.microsoft.com... >> >>> Hi: >>> >>> With 25 users, this is a canidate for a swing migration to new or >>> same hardware. You would want to invest in a very good backup, or a >>> some new hard drives so you could go back if the swing failed (almost >>> never happens), but you would not have to touch the domain, the >>> workstations, the server name or have any significant down time. >>> >>> A swing moves the AD, the Exchange store, and the data files, >>> preserving the AD, the domain, the server name, and the shares and >>> permissions. Almost automagicly. >>> >>> Send a message, or call and ask for their opinion. May save you a >>> lot of hassle and the client a lot if time and or $. >>> >>> www.sbs-migration.com >>> >>> - >>> Larry >>> Please post the resolution to your >>> issue so others may benefit >>> - >>> Get Your SBS Health Check at >>> www.sbsbpa.com >>>> I recently took over an SBS 2008 installation from a group that had >>>> no business installing it in the first place. There were a ton of >>>> event viewer errors, Exchange, SBS Console, you name it, they >>>> screwed it up. There are 25 users and they never installed antivirus >>>> on either the Exchange mailboxes or the client computers. Enough of >>>> that.. Here are the few remaining issues. >>>> >>>> 1. They never ran a best practices tool. When I did Exchange showed >>>> a "first administrator group" of an old Exchange 2003 SBS install on >>>> another computer that crashed. I don't know how or why it's there >>>> but the server doesn't exist and there is no Exchange 2003 anywhere. >>>> How do I get rid of that group? There are no E2003 server tools or >>>> anything I can see. >>>> >>>> 2. The SBS console crashes whenever I attempt to run a report. It >>>> goes for about 5 minutes and then the console crashes. Is there a >>>> way to delete the old reports (well over 2 GB database) and start >>>> all over? >>>> >>>> 3. They never used WUS, configured it, or looked at it. When I click >>>> on computers, there are none, nowhere! What did they do? (or didn't >>>> do) What should I do? >>>> >>>> This is a preliminary list. I'm wondering if I should just reinstall >>>> the entire OS, copy the Exchange pst files and data to an external >>>> drive and reformat. I'm close. >>>> >>>> TIA >>>> >>>> Bobby >>>> > >
From: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] on 6 Dec 2009 22:43 bobby <bjanow(a)msn.com> wrote: > I know. But it's just so close. No log errors any longer, spent all > weekend fixing shiit, I just hate to give up on this. Is the fact > that the domain is a .com account a deal breaker? Routing group, > can't I clean this up, power management, a GPO. ? ugh. Those > ba*stards! Believe me, I'm not getting paid enough. So close yet so > far... Well, there may be more wrong than right and a clean install may be the way to go, but note that the myrealddomain.com is not a dealbreaker (and note that FQDN does not = public host/domain - server.internal.local is a fully-qualified domain name too). Heck, if you wanted a lot of headaches you could use microsoft.com for your AD namespace if you wish. Split brain DNS (disjointed namespace) is not always an accident. If the main problem is wizards you can fix that by running them - and add host records for publicly hosted resources such as www to their forward lookup zone (with the correct public IP). > > "Larry Struckmeyer[SBS-MVP]" <lstruckmeyer(a)mis-wizards.com> wrote in > message news:4e6835156b608cc44bb12167153(a)news.microsoft.com... >> >> Ok, under those conditions you are on the right track. If the domain >> name, the server name and so on are not worth saving, then ditch it. >> And certainly a FQDN is a bad/rookie mistake. >> >> - >> Larry >> Please post the resolution to your >> issue so others may benefit >> - >> Get Your SBS Health Check at >> www.sbsbpa.com >> >> >>> I probably wouldn't want to do that. If I reformatted then I would >>> change the domain name, server IP and some other things. I like to >>> have a .local domain and not an FQDN on the server. I just bought a >>> terabyte drive for backup in case. I have not problem taking them >>> down for a day or two over the weekend, but is there any decent way >>> to recover these last few things.? >>> >>> "Larry Struckmeyer[SBS-MVP]" <lstruckmeyer(a)mis-wizards.com> wrote in >>> message news:4e6835156b528cc44b94bd8888b(a)news.microsoft.com... >>> >>>> Hi: >>>> >>>> With 25 users, this is a canidate for a swing migration to new or >>>> same hardware. You would want to invest in a very good backup, or a >>>> some new hard drives so you could go back if the swing failed >>>> (almost never happens), but you would not have to touch the >>>> domain, the workstations, the server name or have any significant >>>> down time. A swing moves the AD, the Exchange store, and the data >>>> files, >>>> preserving the AD, the domain, the server name, and the shares and >>>> permissions. Almost automagicly. >>>> >>>> Send a message, or call and ask for their opinion. May save you a >>>> lot of hassle and the client a lot if time and or $. >>>> >>>> www.sbs-migration.com >>>> >>>> - >>>> Larry >>>> Please post the resolution to your >>>> issue so others may benefit >>>> - >>>> Get Your SBS Health Check at >>>> www.sbsbpa.com >>>>> I recently took over an SBS 2008 installation from a group that >>>>> had no business installing it in the first place. There were a >>>>> ton of event viewer errors, Exchange, SBS Console, you name it, >>>>> they screwed it up. There are 25 users and they never installed >>>>> antivirus on either the Exchange mailboxes or the client >>>>> computers. Enough of that.. Here are the few remaining issues. >>>>> >>>>> 1. They never ran a best practices tool. When I did Exchange >>>>> showed a "first administrator group" of an old Exchange 2003 SBS >>>>> install on another computer that crashed. I don't know how or why >>>>> it's there but the server doesn't exist and there is no Exchange >>>>> 2003 anywhere. How do I get rid of that group? There are no E2003 >>>>> server tools or anything I can see. >>>>> >>>>> 2. The SBS console crashes whenever I attempt to run a report. It >>>>> goes for about 5 minutes and then the console crashes. Is there a >>>>> way to delete the old reports (well over 2 GB database) and start >>>>> all over? >>>>> >>>>> 3. They never used WUS, configured it, or looked at it. When I >>>>> click on computers, there are none, nowhere! What did they do? >>>>> (or didn't do) What should I do? >>>>> >>>>> This is a preliminary list. I'm wondering if I should just >>>>> reinstall the entire OS, copy the Exchange pst files and data to >>>>> an external drive and reformat. I'm close. >>>>> >>>>> TIA >>>>> >>>>> Bobby
From: Leythos on 6 Dec 2009 22:50 In article <#pIbr9udKHA.744(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, lanwench(a)heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com says... > Well, there may be more wrong than right and a clean install may be the way > to go, but note that the myrealddomain.com is not a dealbreaker (and note > that FQDN does not = public host/domain - server.internal.local is a > fully-qualified domain name too). Heck, if you wanted a lot of headaches you > could use microsoft.com for your AD namespace if you wish. Split brain DNS > (disjointed namespace) is not always an accident. If the main problem is > wizards you can fix that by running them - and add host records for publicly > hosted resources such as www to their forward lookup zone (with the correct > public IP). > I've seen the DNS service on a .com/.net internal domain basically try and replicate with a public DNS server at the real .com/.net domain on the internet - 600 attempts per minute.... Anytime I find a .com/.net setup I encourage the customer to blow it away and build it right. -- You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. Trust yourself. spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
From: bobby on 6 Dec 2009 23:17 It's the Exchange thing and the fact they didn't run the SBS wizards at the outset. The server is slow, they put in a cheap firewall, it's just a mess. It might be more work initially, but then I'm done. After that, send me the morning report and I'll reboot when the updates hit. I'm pretty much there, just need a little push. Bj "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" <lanwench(a)heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com> wrote in message news:#pIbr9udKHA.744(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Well, there may be more wrong than right and a clean install may be the > way to go, but note that the myrealddomain.com is not a dealbreaker (and > note that FQDN does not = public host/domain - server.internal.local is a > fully-qualified domain name too). Heck, if you wanted a lot of headaches > you could use microsoft.com for your AD namespace if you wish. Split brain > DNS (disjointed namespace) is not always an accident. If the main problem > is wizards you can fix that by running them - and add host records for > publicly hosted resources such as www to their forward lookup zone (with > the correct public IP). >
From: bobby on 6 Dec 2009 23:18 Thanks. I'm almost there. Rats, gonna be a long weekend coming up. "Leythos" <spam999free(a)rrohio.com> wrote in message news:MPG.25864579a48025f898a001(a)us.news.astraweb.com... > I've seen the DNS service on a .com/.net internal domain basically try > and replicate with a public DNS server at the real .com/.net domain on > the internet - 600 attempts per minute.... > > Anytime I find a .com/.net setup I encourage the customer to blow it > away and build it right.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: clr20r3 migrationwizard.exe Next: Vista power management |