A new theory suggests atmospheric answer to the continuing paradox of why early Earth wasn’t icy
in [Physics]
|
Prev: America has "working relations" with a "terrorist organization" (Israel)
Next: A new theory suggests atmospheric answer to the continuing paradox of why early Earth wasnt icy
From: tunderbar on 10 Jun 2010 14:27 On Jun 4, 8:09 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hazy antidote to a faint young sun > A new theory suggests atmospheric answer to the continuing paradox of > why early Earth wasnt icy.http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/59928/title/Hazy_antidote_... > > "Now comes a totally different idea a planet-cloaking layer of > hydrocarbon haze. Previous studies have suggested that such haze, > generated by light-driven chemical reactions in the methane-rich > atmosphere, would actually cool Earth, but this haze is different, says > Eric T. Wolf, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Colorado at > Boulder". A scientific paradox is when observation differ from theory. In every case a real scientist has to side with observation. A lesson to agw alarmists.
From: Dawlish on 10 Jun 2010 16:13 On Jun 10, 7:27 pm, tunderbar <tdcom...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 4, 8:09 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hazy antidote to a faint young sun > > A new theory suggests atmospheric answer to the continuing paradox of > > why early Earth wasnt icy.http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/59928/title/Hazy_antidote_... > > > "Now comes a totally different idea a planet-cloaking layer of > > hydrocarbon haze. Previous studies have suggested that such haze, > > generated by light-driven chemical reactions in the methane-rich > > atmosphere, would actually cool Earth, but this haze is different, says > > Eric T. Wolf, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Colorado at > > Boulder". > > A scientific paradox is when observation differ from theory. In every > case a real scientist has to side with observation. A lesson to agw > alarmists. Here's the most up-to date global temperature observations: http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/execute.csh?amsutemps+001 I'm glad the real scientists side with the observations and not with denialists like you - and not with AGW alarmists, for that matter.
From: tunderbar on 10 Jun 2010 19:28
On Jun 10, 3:13 pm, Dawlish <pjg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 10, 7:27 pm, tunderbar <tdcom...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 4, 8:09 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hazy antidote to a faint young sun > > > A new theory suggests atmospheric answer to the continuing paradox of > > > why early Earth wasnt icy.http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/59928/title/Hazy_antidote_... > > > > "Now comes a totally different idea a planet-cloaking layer of > > > hydrocarbon haze. Previous studies have suggested that such haze, > > > generated by light-driven chemical reactions in the methane-rich > > > atmosphere, would actually cool Earth, but this haze is different, says > > > Eric T. Wolf, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Colorado at > > > Boulder". > > > A scientific paradox is when observation differ from theory. In every > > case a real scientist has to side with observation. A lesson to agw > > alarmists. > > Here's the most up-to date global temperature observations: > > http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/execute.csh?amsutemps+001 > > I'm glad the real scientists side with the observations and not with > denialists like you - and not with AGW alarmists, for that matter. "real scientists", LOL you wouldn't know one if he bit you in the thermometer. |