From: Sam Wormley on 26 Dec 2009 23:41 On 12/26/09 10:18 PM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: > On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 03:27:06 -0600, Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Answer the question, Henri--can you cite anything that claims >> field are explained by other dimensions that we don't know >> about... or is this another figment of your imagination? > > What is YOUR opinion wormey? What are fields made of? > It's pretty obvious, Henri, that you make some claim, namely that "field are explained by other dimensions that we don't know about"-- that is just some bullshit statement that you cannot defend. Go away, Henri!
From: eric gisse on 27 Dec 2009 00:57 Sam Wormley wrote: > On 12/26/09 10:18 PM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: >> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 03:27:06 -0600, Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: > >>> >>> Answer the question, Henri--can you cite anything that claims >>> field are explained by other dimensions that we don't know >>> about... or is this another figment of your imagination? >> >> What is YOUR opinion wormey? What are fields made of? >> > > > It's pretty obvious, Henri, that you make some claim, > namely that "field are explained by other dimensions > that we don't know about"-- that is just some bullshit > statement that you cannot defend. Go away, Henri! Watch as he tries to take credit for concepts from classical E&M.
From: cjcountess on 27 Dec 2009 14:55 Electron structure can be deduced from geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2 1) Planck discovered E=hf for photons 2)Einstein discovered E=mc^2 for electrons 3)deBroglie discovered E=hf=mc^2 for electron and that it is also a wave 4) Bohr discovered wavelength of electron = circumference of circle with angular momentum of a multiple integer of h/2pi. If we draw shorter and shorter waves on a graph, with corresponding higher and higher energy, mass, and momentum, eventually we arrive at a geometrical picture of a wave with energy = mc^2, whose wavelength = circumference of circle, and angular momentum = multiple integer of (h/ 2pi). Analogous to a line of 1 inch in horizontal direction, x a line of 1 inch in vertical direction, to create 1 square inch, a wave at c in linear direction, x c in 90 degree angular direction, creates 90 degree arc trajectory, which if constant creates a circle of wavelength (cx2pi), with angular momentum of (h/2pi).If the amplitude of wave is constant with previous waves along same EM spectrum, or if we start with circular polarized wave, we get a wave making 2 rotations at right angle to each other, which creates a standing spherical wave, making 2 rotations to complete 1 wave cycle of spin ½ and momentum (h/2pi/2). Furthermore, if the waves spins counter to it trajectory, it will have -1 charge. A backward spinning (-1 charged), standing spherical wave making 2 rotations to complete 1 wave cycle (spin1/2) with momentum of (h/2pi/ 2), which coincide directly with uncertainty principles limit on momentum and position, seems too much of a coincidence for it not to represent true geometry of electron. If we examine this picture on u tube, it too looks like a standing spherical wave, rotating about 2 axis, and does not contradict this geometrical picture. Now I must admit that it is incredible to me how they got such a picture but it is not in conflict with my geometrical description http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofp-OHIq6Wo&feature=related Also see: http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dsn5q6f_101hgtjv9fb&hl=en Conrad J Countess
From: glird on 27 Dec 2009 20:23 On Dec 27, 5:04 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_q> wrote: > > Man is INSANE. MANY decades ago I discovered that Earth is the lunatic asylum of the Universe. Accordingly, if you are here, you are insane! unfortunately 4 me, i 2 am here ... :-( glird
From: glird on 28 Dec 2009 17:57
On Dec 25, 10:24 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > There can be properties at a given point, obviously, eg > charge. That's because "at a point' is entirely different than "in a point". glird. |