A prove that the electron is not a point particle!!
in [Relativity]
|
From: PD on 30 Dec 2009 18:32 On Dec 30, 2:50 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Dec 30, 2:17 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > ><"Explain" in physics means being able to make a quantitative prediction of a measurable property, where that prediction is derived from certain core principles. > > > No wonder physicists don't understand what their equations say. To > normal people, "explain" means to tell us what a "quantitative > prediction" (an equation) of a "measurable property" (a dimension) > MEANS in terms of things that actually exist. Then I understand why you would be confused into thinking you've made a physical explanation, when you've done nothing of the sort. You've perhaps provided a layperson's explanation, but not a PHYSICAL explanation. > > glird
From: Inertial on 30 Dec 2009 18:37 "Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message news:dednj5tivljtb3v48ks5ct6kvatpr305uv(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:17:44 -0800 (PST), PD <thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >>On Dec 25, 4:51 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >>> On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:32:04 -0600, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >On 12/25/09 1:13 AM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: >>> >>> >> A 'point' has zero length in the three known spatial dimensions. It >>> >> has no >>> >> volume. >>> >> However, it can have coordinate lengths in other dimensions which we >>> >> humans are >>> >> not yet equipped to detect. >>> >>> > Or, more simply, do not exist! >>> >>> >> Thus, a point can have properties...but not ones that our current >>> >> physics can >>> >> deal with. >>> >>> > Thus, is meaningless. >>> >>> Everything you say is meaningless. >>> >>> 'Fields' for instance are explainable in terms of other dimensions that >>> we dont >>> know about. >> >>"Explain" in physics means being able to make a quantitative >>prediction of a measurable property, where that prediction is derived >>from certain core principles. >> >>You haven't demonstrated that fields are "explainable" in this sense >>at all, or in any way. > > > I didn't say I had Umm .. yes .. you did. "'Fields' for instance are explainable". So you lied.
From: Greg Neill on 31 Dec 2009 11:03 PD wrote: > On Dec 30, 7:27 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >> Take magnetic lines of force around a bar magnet. >> They are exactly like the shape of a closed flexible pipe that contains flowing >> liquid. >> >> ..........just another of my original discoveries... > > Note this doesn't satisfy the scientific criterion for an > "explanation". Also, Faraday got there first in the early 1800's. Ralph/Henry is deficient in both science and the history of science. Next week he'll be claiming to have invented the wheel.
From: Inertial on 31 Dec 2009 19:33 "Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message news:5h3qj556m9vio0q8jav13ghquf1fgjb27d(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:03:53 -0500, "Greg Neill" > <gneillRE(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> > wrote: > >>PD wrote: >>> On Dec 30, 7:27 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >> >>>> Take magnetic lines of force around a bar magnet. >>>> They are exactly like the shape of a closed flexible pipe that contains >>flowing >>>> liquid. >>>> >>>> ..........just another of my original discoveries... >>> >>> Note this doesn't satisfy the scientific criterion for an >>> "explanation". >> >>Also, Faraday got there first in the early 1800's. Ralph/Henry >>is deficient in both science and the history of science. Next >>week he'll be claiming to have invented the wheel. > > The LEVER came before the wheel and was more important. So you invented that, did you?
From: Inertial on 31 Dec 2009 23:29
"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message news:31uqj59npbuae421hlvonk84lopml9fr5s(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 11:33:49 +1100, "Inertial" <relatively(a)rest.com> wrote: > >> >>"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message >>news:5h3qj556m9vio0q8jav13ghquf1fgjb27d(a)4ax.com... >>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:03:53 -0500, "Greg Neill" >>> <gneillRE(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>PD wrote: >>>>> On Dec 30, 7:27 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Take magnetic lines of force around a bar magnet. >>>>>> They are exactly like the shape of a closed flexible pipe that >>>>>> contains >>>>flowing >>>>>> liquid. >>>>>> >>>>>> ..........just another of my original discoveries... >>>>> >>>>> Note this doesn't satisfy the scientific criterion for an >>>>> "explanation". >>>> >>>>Also, Faraday got there first in the early 1800's. Ralph/Henry >>>>is deficient in both science and the history of science. Next >>>>week he'll be claiming to have invented the wheel. >>> >>> The LEVER came before the wheel and was more important. >> >>So you invented that, did you? > > I invented the recognition that it preceded the wheel. You did nothing of consequence. |