Prev: Universe itself is the one and only magnetic monopole Chapt 14 #182; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: the hindu 10 digit number system, the foundation of human progress
From: Graham Cooper on 24 Jun 2010 23:59
I'm going to pick one of your numerous inane distinctions
to save us both from bursting an artery here.

Is the following true or false?

You can effectively select any real in the list to use the first
digit in the antidiagonal construction.

Remove the word effectively and you call it false.

Asking for pedantic language is one thing, but George you
have never corrected my grammar without making an error
youself. Nobody has, you can search Google for my posts
and the words spelling, grammar or correction and dozens
of people have tried to correct me and they all failed. Maybe
you can figure out the reason for this anomoly.

Herc
From: |-|ercules on 26 Jun 2010 01:32
>> You can effectively select any real in the list to use the first
>> digit in the antidiagonal construction.
>

This is true because it's a valid technique to construct a 'new' real that
is equivalent to Cantor's proof. Crying that it's effectively diagonalization
of a permutation doesn't dispute the truth of the proposition.

I can't just correct the grammar in one of your posts, I can correct the grammar
in ALL of your posts. (HINT: no English professor would even read your garbage posts)

Herc
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Universe itself is the one and only magnetic monopole Chapt 14 #182; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: the hindu 10 digit number system, the foundation of human progress