Prev: NEWS: Apple iPhone 4 available today amid early reports ofhardware issues
Next: painful to watch
From: John Navas on 24 Jun 2010 18:03 On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:34:32 -0600, in <IVOUn.790$RC5.427(a)newsfe08.iad>, Todd Allcock <elecconnec(a)AnoOspamL.com> wrote: >At 24 Jun 2010 08:52:54 -0700 John Navas wrote: >> I pretty much agree -- have been saying for a long time that metered >> service works better for everyone, with the heavy (ab)users paying their >> fair share instead of being subsidized by the majority. > >Agreed. The real problem historically is that users really haven't >learned to think in KBs and MBs. We all know what a minute is, so >counting voice usage is easy. How much is a 10 minute web browsing >session, or a day's email retrieval? "Unlimited" was a way to take the >worry from users. Most phones have no, or woefully inadequate, data >counters. True, but at least carriers are now facing up to usage alerts, although they could be much better as well. >> The majority should care because it will result in better service and/or >> lower rates. > >True, if they learn how to keep track of usage. For example, my T-Mo >grandfathered "T-Mobile Web" plan doesn't track usage- every month my T- >Mo bill (and the website) tells me I've used "0 MB" of data. Only a >third-party app on my phone (or switching my phone to the alternate "EPC" >T-Mo APN that does track it) tells me I use 250-300MB a month. Yep, it's bad that actual data usage still isn't being displayed. >> The blame actually goes to us, for falling for the seemingly attractive >> packages instead of demanding fair and clear plans. As Pogo famously >> said, "We have met the enemy and he is us." But the recent rapid growth >> of low-cost prepaid plans suggests consumers are finally getting the >> message. > >I disagree- we consumers rejected data buckets in the past out of fear, >forcing carriers to respond with unlimited data plans, protected (they >thought) by the law of averages. I think the bigger issue was the high cost of metered data. The irony of AT&T ending unlimited data is that AT&T was the wireless carrier that started it -- I can still remember the press release. I signed up immediately. Excellent segment on this in NPR On The Media <http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/2010/06/11/04>. >I still think T-Mo has the best system- >offer unlimited data, with a bandwidth throttle at a preset softcap. >That way everyone still gets "unlimited data" with the disproportionate >users dealt with effectively without incurring extra charges. Agreed. >> AT&T should be able to detect such ToS violations, and can terminate >> heavy users if it chooses in any event. >Terminating heavy users solely on usage volume without a ToS violation >"smoking gun" would be a PR (and potential legal) nightmare if you >offered and sold them an "unlimited" plan, same as kicking a buffet >patron out of your restaurant for daring grab a third plate of crab legs >after selling him "all you can eat." PR, yes; legal, no -- the carrier has no obligation when the contract has run its course. >Data will eventually become a commodity just like voice has, and the >market is in a downward pricing spiral. The carriers have to enjoy their >current rate structures while they can. The slide to becoming simple >mobile dumb pipes is slow but inevitable. How long before we see an >Android device with a Google Voice/SIP client integrated into the >cellular dialer offering full cellphone functionality on a data-only plan >without clumsy third-party VoIP software? 12 months? 24 tops? That >would give unlimited voice for the price of a data-only plan (currently >$40 on T-Mo for unlimited, $30 for 2GB on AT&T.) We do "live in interesting times." ;) -- Best regards, John <http:/navasgroup.com> "At every crossway on the road that leads to the future, each progressive spirit is opposed by a thousand men appointed to guard the past." -Maeterlinck
|
Pages: 1 Prev: NEWS: Apple iPhone 4 available today amid early reports ofhardware issues Next: painful to watch |