From: Leythos on
In article <g3gvj5l9jvb5jams0ouemo7kr6ncqeshc3(a)4ax.com>, pajap(a)news-
only.co.uk.invalid says...
>
> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 22:28:08 +0100, FredW <fredw(a)blackholespam.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:52:47 +0000, PajaP
> ><pajap(a)news-only.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >>I would encourage others to visit the site and read the report and draw
> >>their own conclusions.
> >>
> >>I will contact the AV_Comparatives and ask for clarification of how much
> >>more of the report can be discussed here.
> >
> >One single report does not mean very much to me.
> >
> >I prefer to look at the yearly Summary Reports.
> >http://www.av-comparatives.org/comparativesreviews/main-tests/summary-reports
> >All tests reports have their contribution in the summary.
>
> Thanks. Interesting reading.
> The overall winner comes as a bit of a surprise (to me).

Yep: Just look at where MS Places:

Never in the top 3 for detecting or securing

#1 for false positives

And look at the PERFORMANCE WINNER: Avira


--
You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little
voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that.
Trust yourself.
spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Avast! Internet Security.
Next: AV Comparatives