According to 1905 Relativity, a single material point must be always at rest
in [Relativity]
|
From: Inertial on 9 Jun 2010 06:55 "Sue..." <suzysewnshow(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:ab3cf0e0-22ae-4b4f-b57a-e80f71fa2370(a)x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 9, 6:44 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message >> >> news:813f2f6b-6485-45f3-b306-5d4e90a743b8(a)q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... >> >> > On Jun 9, 5:32 am, harald <h...(a)swissonline.ch> wrote: >> > [...] >> >> Surely you understand that it has qualitatively the *same* state of >> >> motion; the direction of motion cannot make a difference for the >> >> prediction. >> >> Thus logically, the same can be said for a clock that is moving along >> >> a polygonal trajectory, since an infinitely quick change of direction >> >> does not affect the indication of a good clock. >> >> > This is not true because Emmy Noether said (somewhat later >> > than 1905) that a meter stick taped to a gun barrel is a good clock. >> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem#Applications >> > -------------- > >> So what? How is that related to what he said? > > You tell me. I have better things to do > than read beyond false statements. As I thought .. you posted without having any idea what you were saying.. Typical for Sue.
From: Sue... on 9 Jun 2010 07:04 On Jun 9, 6:55 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message > > news:ab3cf0e0-22ae-4b4f-b57a-e80f71fa2370(a)x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > > > On Jun 9, 6:44 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >> "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message > > >>news:813f2f6b-6485-45f3-b306-5d4e90a743b8(a)q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com.... > > >> > On Jun 9, 5:32 am, harald <h...(a)swissonline.ch> wrote: > >> > [...] > >> >> Surely you understand that it has qualitatively the *same* state of > >> >> motion; the direction of motion cannot make a difference for the > >> >> prediction. > >> >> Thus logically, the same can be said for a clock that is moving along > >> >> a polygonal trajectory, since an infinitely quick change of direction > >> >> does not affect the indication of a good clock. > > >> > This is not true because Emmy Noether said (somewhat later > >> > than 1905) that a meter stick taped to a gun barrel is a good clock. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem#Applications > > > -------------- > > >> So what? How is that related to what he said? > > > You tell me. I have better things to do > > than read beyond false statements. > ============ > As I thought .. you posted without having any idea what you were saying.. > Typical for Sue. Learn some science, you obnoious fool. :-) Hamlet is Hamlet whether it comes from Shakespeare's pen or a monkey with a typewriter. Sue...
From: harald on 9 Jun 2010 07:14 On Jun 9, 1:04 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote: > On Jun 9, 6:55 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message > > >news:ab3cf0e0-22ae-4b4f-b57a-e80f71fa2370(a)x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com.... > > > > On Jun 9, 6:44 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > >> "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message > > > >>news:813f2f6b-6485-45f3-b306-5d4e90a743b8(a)q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... > > > >> > On Jun 9, 5:32 am, harald <h...(a)swissonline.ch> wrote: > > >> > [...] > > >> >> Surely you understand that it has qualitatively the *same* state of > > >> >> motion; the direction of motion cannot make a difference for the > > >> >> prediction. > > >> >> Thus logically, the same can be said for a clock that is moving along > > >> >> a polygonal trajectory, since an infinitely quick change of direction > > >> >> does not affect the indication of a good clock. > > > >> > This is not true because Emmy Noether said (somewhat later > > >> > than 1905) that a meter stick taped to a gun barrel is a good clock. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem#Applications > > > > -------------- > > > >> So what? How is that related to what he said? > > > > You tell me. I have better things to do > > > than read beyond false statements. > > ============ > > > As I thought .. you posted without having any idea what you were saying... > > Typical for Sue. > > Learn some science, you obnoious fool. :-) > > Hamlet is Hamlet whether it comes from > Shakespeare's pen or a monkey with a typewriter. > > Sue... I still suspect that you are not a monkey but a computer program: http://jerz.setonhill.edu/if/canon/eliza.htm ;-) Harald
From: Sue... on 9 Jun 2010 11:41 On Jun 9, 7:14 am, harald <h...(a)swissonline.ch> wrote: > On Jun 9, 1:04 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 9, 6:55 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message > > > >news:ab3cf0e0-22ae-4b4f-b57a-e80f71fa2370(a)x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com.... > > > > > On Jun 9, 6:44 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > >> "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message > > > > >>news:813f2f6b-6485-45f3-b306-5d4e90a743b8(a)q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... > > > > >> > On Jun 9, 5:32 am, harald <h...(a)swissonline.ch> wrote: > > > >> > [...] > > > >> >> Surely you understand that it has qualitatively the *same* state of > > > >> >> motion; the direction of motion cannot make a difference for the > > > >> >> prediction. > > > >> >> Thus logically, the same can be said for a clock that is moving along > > > >> >> a polygonal trajectory, since an infinitely quick change of direction > > > >> >> does not affect the indication of a good clock. > > > > >> > This is not true because Emmy Noether said (somewhat later > > > >> > than 1905) that a meter stick taped to a gun barrel is a good clock. > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem#Applications > > > > > -------------- > > > > >> So what? How is that related to what he said? > > > > > You tell me. I have better things to do > > > > than read beyond false statements. > > > ============ > > > > As I thought .. you posted without having any idea what you were saying.. > > > Typical for Sue. > > > Learn some science, you obnoious fool. :-) > > > Hamlet is Hamlet whether it comes from > > Shakespeare's pen or a monkey with a typewriter. > > > Sue... > > I still suspect that you are not a monkey but a computer program: > > http://jerz.setonhill.edu/if/canon/eliza.htm;-) Why not give it eliza a try and see if it can detect your non-responsive posts? Sue... > > Harald
From: harald on 9 Jun 2010 14:52
On Jun 9, 5:41 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote: > On Jun 9, 7:14 am, harald <h...(a)swissonline.ch> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 9, 1:04 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > > On Jun 9, 6:55 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message > > > > >news:ab3cf0e0-22ae-4b4f-b57a-e80f71fa2370(a)x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > On Jun 9, 6:44 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > >> "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message > > > > > >>news:813f2f6b-6485-45f3-b306-5d4e90a743b8(a)q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... > > > > > >> > On Jun 9, 5:32 am, harald <h...(a)swissonline.ch> wrote: > > > > >> > [...] > > > > >> >> Surely you understand that it has qualitatively the *same* state of > > > > >> >> motion; the direction of motion cannot make a difference for the > > > > >> >> prediction. > > > > >> >> Thus logically, the same can be said for a clock that is moving along > > > > >> >> a polygonal trajectory, since an infinitely quick change of direction > > > > >> >> does not affect the indication of a good clock. > > > > > >> > This is not true because Emmy Noether said (somewhat later > > > > >> > than 1905) that a meter stick taped to a gun barrel is a good clock. > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem#Applications > > > > > > -------------- > > > > > >> So what? How is that related to what he said? > > > > > > You tell me. I have better things to do > > > > > than read beyond false statements. > > > > ============ > > > > > As I thought .. you posted without having any idea what you were saying.. > > > > Typical for Sue. > > > > Learn some science, you obnoious fool. :-) > > > > Hamlet is Hamlet whether it comes from > > > Shakespeare's pen or a monkey with a typewriter. > > > > Sue... > > > I still suspect that you are not a monkey but a computer program: > > >http://jerz.setonhill.edu/if/canon/eliza.htm;-) > > Why not give it eliza a try and see if it can > detect your non-responsive posts? > > Sue... Hmm we already have you for free! :-)) |